These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27115608)

  • 1. Blocking as a friend of induction in verbal category learning.
    Sorensen LJ; Woltz DJ
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Oct; 44(7):1000-13. PubMed ID: 27115608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How should exemplars be sequenced in inductive learning? Empirical evidence versus learners' opinions.
    Yan VX; Soderstrom NC; Seneviratna GS; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):403-416. PubMed ID: 28816472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of training sequence and between-category similarity on unsupervised induction.
    Clapper JP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(7):1370-90. PubMed ID: 25384115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal sequencing during category learning: Testing a dual-learning systems perspective.
    Noh SM; Yan VX; Bjork RA; Maddox WT
    Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():23-29. PubMed ID: 27343480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Putting category learning in order: Category structure and temporal arrangement affect the benefit of interleaved over blocked study.
    Carvalho PF; Goldstone RL
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Apr; 42(3):481-95. PubMed ID: 24092426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The benefit of interleaved presentation in category learning is independent of working memory.
    Wang J; Liu Z; Xing Q; Seger CA
    Memory; 2020 Feb; 28(2):285-292. PubMed ID: 31900048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The benefits of interleaved and blocked study: different tasks benefit from different schedules of study.
    Carvalho PF; Goldstone RL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Feb; 22(1):281-8. PubMed ID: 24984923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Change one category at a time: Sequence effects beyond interleaving and blocking.
    Abel R; Brunmair M; Weissgerber SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1083-1105. PubMed ID: 33523692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why does interleaving improve math learning? The contributions of discriminative contrast and distributed practice.
    Foster NL; Mueller ML; Was C; Rawson KA; Dunlosky J
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1088-1101. PubMed ID: 30877483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Category similarity affects study choices in self-regulated learning.
    Lu X; Penney TB; Kang SHK
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jan; 49(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 32740725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual category learning: Navigating the intersection of rules and similarity.
    Hughes GI; Thomas AK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):711-731. PubMed ID: 33464550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monitoring of learning at the category level when learning a natural concept: will task experience improve its resolution?
    Tauber SK; Dunlosky J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():8-18. PubMed ID: 25528538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What Is the Mechanism Underlying the Interleaving Effect in Category Induction: An Eye-Tracking and Behavioral Study.
    Ge Y; Li F; Li X; Li W
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():770885. PubMed ID: 34975661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interleaving Effects in Blindfolded Perceptual Learning Across Various Sensory Modalities.
    Abel R
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Apr; 47(4):e13270. PubMed ID: 37029510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does practice in category learning increase rule use or exemplar use-or both?
    Thibaut JP; Gelaes S; Murphy GL
    Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):530-543. PubMed ID: 29313292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: the roles of discrimination and retrieval.
    Birnbaum MS; Kornell N; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):392-402. PubMed ID: 23138567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Category induction in autism: slower, perhaps different, but certainly possible.
    Soulières I; Mottron L; Giguère G; Larochelle S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Feb; 64(2):311-27. PubMed ID: 20623440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incidental auditory category learning.
    Gabay Y; Dick FK; Zevin JD; Holt LL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1124-38. PubMed ID: 26010588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The time course of explicit and implicit categorization.
    Smith JD; Zakrzewski AC; Herberger ER; Boomer J; Roeder JL; Ashby FG; Church BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2476-90. PubMed ID: 26025556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transfer of category learning to impoverished contexts.
    Whitehead PS; Zamary A; Marsh EJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):1035-1044. PubMed ID: 34918273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.