BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27115646)

  • 1. A Broad Overview of Computational Methods for Predicting the Pathophysiological Effects of Non-synonymous Variants.
    Castellana S; Fusilli C; Mazza T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1415():423-40. PubMed ID: 27115646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. UMD-Predictor: A High-Throughput Sequencing Compliant System for Pathogenicity Prediction of any Human cDNA Substitution.
    Salgado D; Desvignes JP; Rai G; Blanchard A; Miltgen M; Pinard A; Lévy N; Collod-Béroud G; Béroud C
    Hum Mutat; 2016 May; 37(5):439-46. PubMed ID: 26842889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prioritization Of Nonsynonymous Single Nucleotide Variants For Exome Sequencing Studies Via Integrative Learning On Multiple Genomic Data.
    Wu M; Wu J; Chen T; Jiang R
    Sci Rep; 2015 Oct; 5():14955. PubMed ID: 26459872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying driver mutations from sequencing data of heterogeneous tumors in the era of personalized genome sequencing.
    Zhang J; Liu J; Sun J; Chen C; Foltz G; Lin B
    Brief Bioinform; 2014 Mar; 15(2):244-55. PubMed ID: 23818492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variant Calling From Next Generation Sequence Data.
    Hansen NF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1418():209-24. PubMed ID: 27008017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrated next-generation sequencing analysis of whole exome and 409 cancer-related genes.
    Shimoda Y; Nagashima T; Urakami K; Tanabe T; Saito J; Naruoka A; Serizawa M; Mochizuki T; Ohshima K; Ohnami S; Ohnami S; Kusuhara M; Yamaguchi K
    Biomed Res; 2016; 37(6):367-379. PubMed ID: 28003584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
    Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interactive Exploration, Analysis, and Visualization of Complex Phenome-Genome Datasets with ASPIREdb.
    Tan PP; Rogic S; Zoubarev A; McDonald C; Lui F; Charathsandran G; Jacobson M; Belmadani M; Leong J; Van Rossum T; Portales-Casamar E; Qiao Y; Calli K; Liu X; Hudson M; Rajcan-Separovic E; Lewis MS; Pavlidis P
    Hum Mutat; 2016 Aug; 37(8):719-26. PubMed ID: 27158917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of Nonsynonymous Single-Nucleotide Variations on Post-Translational Modification Sites in Human Proteins.
    Gulzar N; Dingerdissen H; Yan C; Mazumder R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1558():159-190. PubMed ID: 28150238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. mirVAFC: A Web Server for Prioritizations of Pathogenic Sequence Variants from Exome Sequencing Data via Classifications.
    Li Z; Liu Z; Jiang Y; Chen D; Ran X; Sun ZS; Wu J
    Hum Mutat; 2017 Jan; 38(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 27676360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. wKGGSeq: A Comprehensive Strategy-Based and Disease-Targeted Online Framework to Facilitate Exome Sequencing Studies of Inherited Disorders.
    Li MJ; Deng J; Wang P; Yang W; Ho SL; Sham PC; Wang J; Li M
    Hum Mutat; 2015 May; 36(5):496-503. PubMed ID: 25676918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New insights into the pathogenicity of non-synonymous variants through multi-level analysis.
    Sun H; Yu G
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1667. PubMed ID: 30733553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computational approaches to study the effects of small genomic variations.
    Khafizov K; Ivanov MV; Glazova OV; Kovalenko SP
    J Mol Model; 2015 Oct; 21(10):251. PubMed ID: 26350246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ClinPred: Prediction Tool to Identify Disease-Relevant Nonsynonymous Single-Nucleotide Variants.
    Alirezaie N; Kernohan KD; Hartley T; Majewski J; Hocking TD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2018 Oct; 103(4):474-483. PubMed ID: 30220433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multilayer View of Pathogenic SNVs in Human Interactome through In Silico Edgetic Profiling.
    Cui H; Zhao N; Korkin D
    J Mol Biol; 2018 Sep; 430(18 Pt A):2974-2992. PubMed ID: 30017919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Practical Guide to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).
    Wang Z; Jensen MA; Zenklusen JC
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1418():111-41. PubMed ID: 27008012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational analysis in cancer exome sequencing.
    Evans P; Kong Y; Krauthammer M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1176():219-27. PubMed ID: 25030931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulating Next-Generation Sequencing Datasets from Empirical Mutation and Sequencing Models.
    Stephens ZD; Hudson ME; Mainzer LS; Taschuk M; Weber MR; Iyer RK
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0167047. PubMed ID: 27893777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MAPPIN: a method for annotating, predicting pathogenicity and mode of inheritance for nonsynonymous variants.
    Gosalia N; Economides AN; Dewey FE; Balasubramanian S
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Oct; 45(18):10393-10402. PubMed ID: 28977528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Challenges in exome analysis by LifeScope and its alternative computational pipelines.
    Pranckevičiene E; Rančelis T; Pranculis A; Kučinskas V
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():421. PubMed ID: 26346699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.