471 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27116049)
1. Benefits to Speech Perception in Noise From the Binaural Integration of Electric and Acoustic Signals in Simulated Unilateral Deafness.
Ma N; Morris S; Kitterick PT
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):248-59. PubMed ID: 27116049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.
Sheffield SW; Goupell MJ; Spencer NJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):576-590. PubMed ID: 31436754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Effect of Interaural Mismatches on Contralateral Unmasking With Single-Sided Vocoders.
Wess JM; Brungart DS; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 28002083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Xu K; Willis S; Gopen Q; Fu QJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 32132377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acoustic Hearing Can Interfere With Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear-Implant Speech Perception.
Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Jensen KK; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):747-761. PubMed ID: 31584504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.
Aronoff JM; Freed DJ; Fisher LM; Pal I; Soli SD
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):468-84. PubMed ID: 21412155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Binaural Perception in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users with Unrestricted or Restricted Acoustic Hearing in the Non-Implanted Ear.
Dorbeau C; Galvin J; Fu QJ; Legris E; Marx M; Bakhos D
Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(3):187-197. PubMed ID: 30352440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benefits of Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness: Data From the House Clinic-University of Southern California-University of California, Los Angeles Clinical Trial.
Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Wilkinson EP; Mills D; Hagan SC; Lupo JE; Padilla M; Shannon RV
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):766-781. PubMed ID: 30358655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved interaural timing of acoustic nerve stimulation affects sound localization in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Seebacher J; Franke-Trieger A; Weichbold V; Zorowka P; Stephan K
Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():19-27. PubMed ID: 30439571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech Understanding With Bimodal Stimulation Is Determined by Monaural Signal to Noise Ratios: No Binaural Cue Processing Involved.
Dieudonné B; Francart T
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1158-1171. PubMed ID: 32833388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential Effects of Binaural Pitch Fusion Range on the Benefits of Voice Gender Differences in a "Cocktail Party" Environment for Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
Oh Y; Srinivasan NK; Hartling CL; Gallun FJ; Reiss LAJ
Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):318-329. PubMed ID: 36395512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The contribution of matched envelope dynamic range to the binaural benefits in simulated bilateral electric hearing.
Chen F; Wong LL; Qiu J; Liu Y; Azimi B; Hu Y
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1166-74. PubMed ID: 23926330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Wilson BS
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):e138-48. PubMed ID: 26862711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Amplitude-mapping effects on speech intelligibility with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants.
van Hoesel R; Böhm M; Battmer RD; Beckschebe J; Lenarz T
Ear Hear; 2005 Aug; 26(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 16079633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
Kerber S; Seeber BU
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptually aligning apical frequency regions leads to more binaural fusion of speech in a cochlear implant simulation.
Staisloff HE; Lee DH; Aronoff JM
Hear Res; 2016 Jul; 337():59-64. PubMed ID: 27208791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unilateral Hearing Loss: Understanding Speech Recognition and Localization Variability-Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):159-173. PubMed ID: 28067750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
