These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

557 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27117768)

  • 1. The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?
    Simis MJ; Madden H; Cacciatore MA; Yeo SK
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):400-14. PubMed ID: 27117768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return?
    Meyer G
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):433-46. PubMed ID: 27117771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? The eternal recurrence of the public deficit.
    Cortassa C
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):447-59. PubMed ID: 27117772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? How do the shifting information flows in healthcare affect the deficit model of science communication?
    Ko H
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):427-32. PubMed ID: 27117770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In science communication, why does the idea of the public deficit always return? Exploring key influences.
    Suldovsky B
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):415-26. PubMed ID: 27117769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better-informed public.
    Sturgis P; Cooper H; Fife-Schaw C
    New Genet Soc; 2005 Apr; 24(1):31-56. PubMed ID: 16552916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.
    Llorente C; Revuelta G; Carrió M; Porta M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224262. PubMed ID: 31721768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientists' deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation.
    Choi S; Anderson AA; Cagle S; Long M; Kelp N
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0287870. PubMed ID: 37531388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Science communication as political communication.
    Scheufele DA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13585-92. PubMed ID: 25225389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why public dissemination of science matters: a manifesto.
    Eagleman DM
    J Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 33(30):12147-9. PubMed ID: 23884922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Facial appearance affects science communication.
    Gheorghiu AI; Callan MJ; Skylark WJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jun; 114(23):5970-5975. PubMed ID: 28533389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Communicating science in public controversies: Strategic considerations of the German climate scientists.
    Post S
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 24583579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return?
    Raps BG
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):460-4. PubMed ID: 27117773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Communicating science in politicized environments.
    Lupia A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Aug; 110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14048-54. PubMed ID: 23940336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.
    Dudo A; Besley JC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148867. PubMed ID: 26913869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting scientists' participation in public life.
    Besley JC; Oh SH; Nisbet M
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Nov; 22(8):971-87. PubMed ID: 23825262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Public attitudes to genomic science: an experiment in information provision.
    Sturgis P; Brunton-Smith I; Fife-Schaw C
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Mar; 19(2):166-80. PubMed ID: 20533796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critical review of the United Kingdom's "gold standard" survey of public attitudes to science.
    Smith BK; Jensen EA
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Feb; 25(2):154-70. PubMed ID: 26783249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic science.
    Barnett J; Cooper H; Senior V
    Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):921-33. PubMed ID: 17958501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An emerging form of public engagement with science: Ask Me Anything (AMA) sessions on Reddit r/science.
    Hara N; Abbazio J; Perkins K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216789. PubMed ID: 31091264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.