These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27117770)

  • 1. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? How do the shifting information flows in healthcare affect the deficit model of science communication?
    Ko H
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):427-32. PubMed ID: 27117770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In science communication, why does the idea of the public deficit always return? Exploring key influences.
    Suldovsky B
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):415-26. PubMed ID: 27117769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?
    Simis MJ; Madden H; Cacciatore MA; Yeo SK
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):400-14. PubMed ID: 27117768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? The eternal recurrence of the public deficit.
    Cortassa C
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):447-59. PubMed ID: 27117772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The role of information in public health decision-making].
    Cecchi C
    Sante Publique; 2008; 20(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 19014090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return?
    Meyer G
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):433-46. PubMed ID: 27117771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return?
    Raps BG
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):460-4. PubMed ID: 27117773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reconsidering healthcare evidence as dynamic and distributed: the role of information and cognition.
    Sedig K; Parsons P; Naimi A; Willoughby K
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Jun; 13(2):43-51. PubMed ID: 26057647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Health communication and public media: professionals need to be heard].
    Meijman FJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Aug; 152(32):1760-4. PubMed ID: 18754306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple perspectives on shared decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare.
    Chong WW; Aslani P; Chen TF
    J Interprof Care; 2013 May; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 23421345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shared decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare: a qualitative study exploring perceptions of barriers and facilitators.
    Chong WW; Aslani P; Chen TF
    J Interprof Care; 2013 Sep; 27(5):373-9. PubMed ID: 23679672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unbalanced progress: The hard road from science popularisation to public engagement with science in China.
    Jia H; Liu L
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 24434709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Citizens' participation in health: education and shared decision-making. SESPAS Report 2012].
    Ruiz-Azarola A; Perestelo-Pérez L
    Gac Sanit; 2012 Mar; 26 Suppl 1():158-61. PubMed ID: 22265652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Public and patient involvement in health policy: A continuously growing field.
    Souliotis K
    Health Expect; 2016 Dec; 19(6):1171-1172. PubMed ID: 27878935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving interpretation of publically reported statistics on health and healthcare: the Figure Interpretation Assessment Tool (FIAT-Health).
    Gerrits RG; Kringos DS; van den Berg MJ; Klazinga NS
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Mar; 16(1):20. PubMed ID: 29514711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Science communication as political communication.
    Scheufele DA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13585-92. PubMed ID: 25225389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How can scientists bring research to use: the HENVINET experience.
    Bartonova A
    Environ Health; 2012 Jun; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2. PubMed ID: 22759502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Shared decision-making and communication theory: grounding the tango].
    Kasper J; Légaré F; Scheibler F; Geiger F
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2010; 104(8-9):636-41. PubMed ID: 21129700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Communication in a Human biomonitoring study: Focus group work, public engagement and lessons learnt in 17 European countries.
    Exley K; Cano N; Aerts D; Biot P; Casteleyn L; Kolossa-Gehring M; Schwedler G; Castaño A; Angerer J; Koch HM; Esteban M; Schoeters G; Den Hond E; Horvat M; Bloemen L; Knudsen LE; Joas R; Joas A; Dewolf MC; Van de Mieroop E; Katsonouri A; Hadjipanayis A; Cerna M; Krskova A; Becker K; Fiddicke U; Seiwert M; Mørck TA; Rudnai P; Kozepesy S; Cullen E; Kellegher A; Gutleb AC; Fischer ME; Ligocka D; Kamińska J; Namorado S; Reis MF; Lupsa IR; Gurzau AE; Halzlova K; Jajcaj M; Mazej D; Tratnik JS; Huetos O; López A; Berglund M; Larsson K; Sepai O
    Environ Res; 2015 Aug; 141():31-41. PubMed ID: 25499539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bringing values and deliberation to science communication.
    Dietz T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Aug; 110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14081-7. PubMed ID: 23940350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.