These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27117772)

  • 1. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? The eternal recurrence of the public deficit.
    Cortassa C
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):447-59. PubMed ID: 27117772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In science communication, why does the idea of the public deficit always return? Exploring key influences.
    Suldovsky B
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):415-26. PubMed ID: 27117769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return?
    Meyer G
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):433-46. PubMed ID: 27117771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?
    Simis MJ; Madden H; Cacciatore MA; Yeo SK
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):400-14. PubMed ID: 27117768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? How do the shifting information flows in healthcare affect the deficit model of science communication?
    Ko H
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):427-32. PubMed ID: 27117770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return?
    Raps BG
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):460-4. PubMed ID: 27117773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contesting epistemic authority: Conspiracy theories on the boundaries of science.
    Harambam J; Aupers S
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 May; 24(4):466-80. PubMed ID: 25452381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Journalism and science: how to erode the idea of knowledge.
    Meyer G
    J Agric Environ Ethics; 2006; 19(3):239-52. PubMed ID: 17061381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.
    Llorente C; Revuelta G; Carrió M; Porta M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224262. PubMed ID: 31721768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Science communication as political communication.
    Scheufele DA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13585-92. PubMed ID: 25225389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better-informed public.
    Sturgis P; Cooper H; Fife-Schaw C
    New Genet Soc; 2005 Apr; 24(1):31-56. PubMed ID: 16552916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When science becomes too easy: Science popularization inclines laypeople to underrate their dependence on experts.
    Scharrer L; Rupieper Y; Stadtler M; Bromme R
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Nov; 26(8):1003-1018. PubMed ID: 27899471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extended cognition in science communication.
    Ludwig D
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Nov; 23(8):982-95. PubMed ID: 23825285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Denying Darwin: Views on science in the rejection of evolution by Dutch Protestants.
    Hildering P; Consoli L; van den Born R
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Nov; 22(8):988-98. PubMed ID: 23825235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is extinction forever?
    Smith-Patten BD; Bridge ES; Crawford PH; Hough DJ; Kelly JF; Patten MA
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 May; 24(4):481-95. PubMed ID: 25711479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The "trust" heuristic: arguments from authority in public health.
    Cummings L
    Health Commun; 2014; 29(10):1043-56. PubMed ID: 24447008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Communicating science in social settings.
    Scheufele DA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Aug; 110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14040-7. PubMed ID: 23940341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptions of climate change and trust in information providers in rural Australia.
    Buys L; Aird R; van Megen K; Miller E; Sommerfeld J
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Feb; 23(2):170-88. PubMed ID: 23825246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cultural authority of science: public trust and acceptance of organized science.
    Gauchat G
    Public Underst Sci; 2011 Nov; 20(6):751-70. PubMed ID: 22397083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fairness in Knowing: Science Communication and Epistemic Justice.
    Medvecky F
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1393-1408. PubMed ID: 28939945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.