These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27118123)

  • 21. On the Plackett distribution with bivariate censored data.
    Ghosh D
    Int J Biostat; 2008; 4(1):Article 7. PubMed ID: 22462114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sparse relative risk regression models.
    Wit EC; Augugliaro L; Pazira H; González J; Abegaz F
    Biostatistics; 2020 Apr; 21(2):e131-e147. PubMed ID: 30380025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Direct likelihood inference on the cause-specific cumulative incidence function: A flexible parametric regression modelling approach.
    Mozumder SI; Rutherford M; Lambert P
    Stat Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):82-97. PubMed ID: 28971494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Penalized variable selection in competing risks regression.
    Fu Z; Parikh CR; Zhou B
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2017 Jul; 23(3):353-376. PubMed ID: 27016934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Tree-based models for survival data with competing risks.
    Kretowska M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jun; 159():185-198. PubMed ID: 29650312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Competing risks data analysis with high-dimensional covariates: an application in bladder cancer.
    Tapak L; Saidijam M; Sadeghifar M; Poorolajal J; Mahjub H
    Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2015 Jun; 13(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 25907251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analyzing Competing Risk Data Using the R timereg Package.
    Scheike TH; Zhang MJ
    J Stat Softw; 2011 Jan; 38(2):. PubMed ID: 22707920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Missing covariates in competing risks analysis.
    Bartlett JW; Taylor JM
    Biostatistics; 2016 Oct; 17(4):751-63. PubMed ID: 27179002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. High-dimensional feature selection in competing risks modeling: A stable approach using a split-and-merge ensemble algorithm.
    Sun H; Wang X
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100164. PubMed ID: 35934836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Competing risks in clinical research].
    van Kruijsdijk RC; Eijkemans MJ; Visseren FL
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(46):A5176. PubMed ID: 23151330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nonidentical twins: Comparison of frequentist and Bayesian lasso for Cox models.
    Zucknick M; Saadati M; Benner A
    Biom J; 2015 Nov; 57(6):959-81. PubMed ID: 26417963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The mstate package for estimation and prediction in non- and semi-parametric multi-state and competing risks models.
    de Wreede LC; Fiocco M; Putter H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2010 Sep; 99(3):261-74. PubMed ID: 20227129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Competing risks and time-dependent covariates.
    Cortese G; Andersen PK
    Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):138-58. PubMed ID: 20029852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Penalized negative binomial models for modeling an overdispersed count outcome with a high-dimensional predictor space: Application predicting micronuclei frequency.
    Lehman RR; Archer KJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209923. PubMed ID: 30620740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Subdistribution hazard models for competing risks in discrete time.
    Berger M; Schmid M; Welchowski T; Schmitz-Valckenberg S; Beyersmann J
    Biostatistics; 2020 Jul; 21(3):449-466. PubMed ID: 30418529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hierarchical likelihood inference on clustered competing risks data.
    Christian NJ; Ha ID; Jeong JH
    Stat Med; 2016 Jan; 35(2):251-67. PubMed ID: 26278918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A surrogate ℓ
    Kawaguchi ES; Suchard MA; Liu Z; Li G
    Stat Med; 2020 Mar; 39(6):675-686. PubMed ID: 31814146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Penalized estimation of complex, non-linear exposure-lag-response associations.
    Bender A; Scheipl F; Hartl W; Day AG; Küchenhoff H
    Biostatistics; 2019 Apr; 20(2):315-331. PubMed ID: 29447346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prediction accuracy and variable selection for penalized cause-specific hazards models.
    Saadati M; Beyersmann J; Kopp-Schneider A; Benner A
    Biom J; 2018 Mar; 60(2):288-306. PubMed ID: 28762523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Threshold regression for survival data with time-varying covariates.
    Lee ML; Whitmore GA; Rosner BA
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):896-905. PubMed ID: 20213704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.