261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27118156)
1. The contribution of dominance to phenotype prediction in a pine breeding and simulated population.
de Almeida Filho JE; Guimarães JF; E Silva FF; de Resende MD; Muñoz P; Kirst M; Resende MF
Heredity (Edinb); 2016 Jul; 117(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 27118156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic Prediction of Additive and Non-additive Effects Using Genetic Markers and Pedigrees.
de Almeida Filho JE; Guimarães JFR; Fonsceca E Silva F; Vilela de Resende MD; Muñoz P; Kirst M; de Resende Júnior MFR
G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Aug; 9(8):2739-2748. PubMed ID: 31263059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.
Kumar S; Molloy C; Muñoz P; Daetwyler H; Chagné D; Volz R
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2711-8. PubMed ID: 26497141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unraveling additive from nonadditive effects using genomic relationship matrices.
Muñoz PR; Resende MF; Gezan SA; Resende MD; de Los Campos G; Kirst M; Huber D; Peter GF
Genetics; 2014 Dec; 198(4):1759-68. PubMed ID: 25324160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits.
Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():8. PubMed ID: 26830030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of genomic prediction within and across generations in maritime pine.
Bartholomé J; Van Heerwaarden J; Isik F; Boury C; Vidal M; Plomion C; Bouffier L
BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):604. PubMed ID: 27515254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative trait loci influencing forking defects in an outbred pedigree of loblolly pine.
Xiong JS; McKeand SE; Isik F; Wegrzyn J; Neale DB; Zeng ZB; da Costa E Silva L; Whetten RW
BMC Genet; 2016 Oct; 17(1):138. PubMed ID: 27756221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian models with dominance effects for genomic evaluation of quantitative traits.
Wellmann R; Bennewitz J
Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Feb; 94(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 22353246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic estimation of additive and dominance effects and impact of accounting for dominance on accuracy of genomic evaluation in sheep populations.
Moghaddar N; van der Werf JHJ
J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Dec; 134(6):453-462. PubMed ID: 28833716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ridge, Lasso and Bayesian additive-dominance genomic models.
Azevedo CF; de Resende MD; E Silva FF; Viana JM; Valente MS; Resende MF; Muñoz P
BMC Genet; 2015 Aug; 16():105. PubMed ID: 26303864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic prediction of growth in pigs based on a model including additive and dominance effects.
Lopes MS; Bastiaansen JW; Janss L; Knol EF; Bovenhuis H
J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 26676611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of genetic architecture on the prediction accuracy of quantitative traits in samples of unrelated individuals.
Morgante F; Huang W; Maltecca C; Mackay TFC
Heredity (Edinb); 2018 Jun; 120(6):500-514. PubMed ID: 29426878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic evaluation with major genes and polygenic inheritance when some animals are not genotyped using gene content multiple-trait BLUP.
Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():89. PubMed ID: 26576649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers.
Heidaritabar M; Wolc A; Arango J; Zeng J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Bastiaansen JW; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):334-46. PubMed ID: 27357473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dominance genetic variance for traits under directional selection in Drosophila serrata.
Sztepanacz JL; Blows MW
Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):371-84. PubMed ID: 25783700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genomic Model with Correlation Between Additive and Dominance Effects.
Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
Genetics; 2018 Jul; 209(3):711-723. PubMed ID: 29743175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of genetic drift on variance components under a general model of epistasis.
Barton NH; Turelli M
Evolution; 2004 Oct; 58(10):2111-32. PubMed ID: 15562679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The contribution of dominance to the understanding of quantitative genetic variation.
Wellmann R; Bennewitz J
Genet Res (Camb); 2011 Apr; 93(2):139-54. PubMed ID: 21481291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integrating Nonadditive Genomic Relationship Matrices into the Study of Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits.
Nazarian A; Gezan SA
J Hered; 2016 Mar; 107(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 26712858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data.
Lopes MS; Bastiaansen JW; Janss L; Knol EF; Bovenhuis H
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2629-37. PubMed ID: 26438289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
