These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27118729)

  • 1. The Quantitative Relationship Between ISO 15197 Accuracy Criteria and Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) in the Evaluation of Analytical Performance of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) Systems.
    Pardo S; Simmons DA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Sep; 10(5):1182-7. PubMed ID: 27118729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in Unaltered Blood Samples in the Low Glycemic Range and Blood Samples in the Concentration Range Defined by ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G; Pleus S; Link M; Baumstark A; Schmid C; Högel J; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):625-34. PubMed ID: 26062008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Seven-Year Clinical Surveillance Program Demonstrates Consistent MARD Accuracy Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip.
    Setford S; Grady M; Mackintosh S; Donald R; Levy B
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Sep; 12(5):1016-1023. PubMed ID: 29845873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mean Absolute Relative Difference of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems and Relationship to ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G; Mende J; Pleus S; Waldenmaier D; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Haug C
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2022 Sep; 16(5):1089-1095. PubMed ID: 33759584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analytical Performance Requirements for Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Focus on System Accuracy: Relevant Differences Among ISO 15197:2003, ISO 15197:2013, and Current FDA Recommendations.
    Freckmann G; Schmid C; Baumstark A; Rutschmann M; Haug C; Heinemann L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):885-94. PubMed ID: 25872965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance Evaluation of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Using ISO 15197: 2013 Accuracy Criteria, Consensus and Surveillance Error Grid Analyses, and Insulin Dosing Error Modeling in a Hospital Setting.
    Bedini JL; Wallace JF; Pardo S; Petruschke T
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 10(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 26445813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Significance and Reliability of MARD for the Accuracy of CGM Systems.
    Reiterer F; Polterauer P; Schoemaker M; Schmelzeisen-Redecker G; Freckmann G; Heinemann L; Del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Jan; 11(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 27566735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advances in Patient Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.
    Pfützner A
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Nov; 10(1):101-3. PubMed ID: 26621051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of factors that determine the mean absolute relative difference in flash glucose monitoring with reference to plasma glucose levels in Japanese subjects without diabetes.
    Yoshino S; Yamada E; Okada S; Nakajima Y; Shibusawa R; Uehara R; Matsumoto S; Horiguchi K; Ishida E; Saito T; Yamada M
    Endocr J; 2020 May; 67(5):537-544. PubMed ID: 32023588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy evaluation of blood glucose monitoring systems in children on overnight closed-loop control.
    DeSalvo DJ; Shanmugham S; Ly TT; Wilson DM; Buckingham BA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 Sep; 8(5):969-73. PubMed ID: 24876427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. System Accuracy Evaluation of Four Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Following ISO 15197 Using a Glucose Oxidase and a Hexokinase-Based Comparison Method.
    Link M; Schmid C; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Rittmeyer D; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 9(5):1041-50. PubMed ID: 25872967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Multicenter Performance Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System in 21 Leading Hospitals in Spain.
    Bedini JL; Wallace JF; Petruschke T; Pardo S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 10(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 26253142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance Comparison of CGM Systems: MARD Values Are Not Always a Reliable Indicator of CGM System Accuracy.
    Kirchsteiger H; Heinemann L; Freckmann G; Lodwig V; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Schoemaker M; Del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Sep; 9(5):1030-40. PubMed ID: 26330485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self-Testing with Built-in Insulin Dose Advisor Based on ISO 15197:2013: System Accuracy and Hematocrit Influence.
    Jendrike N; Baumstark A; Pleus S; Liebing C; Beer A; Flacke F; Haug C; Freckmann G
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Apr; 20(4):303-313. PubMed ID: 29664706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance evaluations of continuous glucose monitoring systems: precision absolute relative deviation is part of the assessment.
    Obermaier K; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Schoemaker M; Klötzer HM; Kirchsteiger H; Eikmeier H; del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):824-32. PubMed ID: 23911163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Point-of-Care Blood Glucose Testing: Post-Market Performance Assessment of the Accu-Chek Inform II Hospital-Use Glucose Meter].
    Petryaykina EE; Mayanskiy NA; Demina ES; Karamysheva IV; Gorst KA; Timofeev AV
    Ter Arkh; 2023 Dec; 95(12):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 38785055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Continuous glucose monitoring accuracy results vary between assessment at home and assessment at the clinical research center.
    Luijf YM; Avogaro A; Benesch C; Bruttomesso D; Cobelli C; Ellmerer M; Heinemann L; Mader JK; DeVries JH;
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 6(5):1103-6. PubMed ID: 23063036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in the Hands of Intended Users and Trained Personnel Based on ISO 15197 Requirements.
    Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Rittmeyer D; Pleus S; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Apr; 19(4):246-254. PubMed ID: 28225633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Calibrated With Capillary Values Using Capillary or Venous Glucose Levels as a Reference.
    Andelin M; Kropff J; Matuleviciene V; Joseph JI; Attvall S; Theodorsson E; Hirsch IB; Imberg H; Dahlqvist S; Klonoff D; Haraldsson B; DeVries JH; Lind M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 10(4):876-84. PubMed ID: 26810924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. System Accuracy Evaluation of Different Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013 by Using Two Different Comparison Methods.
    Freckmann G; Link M; Schmid C; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):635-48. PubMed ID: 26110670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.