196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27118931)
1. High-Resolution Manometry in Clinical Practice.
Carlson DA; Pandolfino JE
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y); 2015 Jun; 11(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 27118931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Esophageal Pressure Topography vs. Conventional Line Tracing.
Carlson DA; Ravi K; Kahrilas PJ; Gyawali CP; Bredenoord AJ; Castell DO; Spechler SJ; Halland M; Kanuri N; Katzka DA; Leggett CL; Roman S; Saenz JB; Sayuk GS; Wong AC; Yadlapati R; Ciolino JD; Fox MR; Pandolfino JE
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 110(7):967-77; quiz 978. PubMed ID: 26032151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-resolution esophageal manometry: interpretation in clinical practice.
Yadlapati R
Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2017 Jul; 33(4):301-309. PubMed ID: 28426462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography.
Bredenoord AJ; Fox M; Kahrilas PJ; Pandolfino JE; Schwizer W; Smout AJ;
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2012 Mar; 24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):57-65. PubMed ID: 22248109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utility of Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry in Clinical Practice: First, Do HRM.
Dhawan I; O'Connell B; Patel A; Schey R; Parkman HP; Friedenberg F
Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Dec; 63(12):3178-3186. PubMed ID: 30276571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [High-resolution Manometry for Esophageal Motility Disorders].
Sakai M; Saito H; Kuriyama K; Yoshida T; Kumakura Y; Hara K; Sohda M; Kuwano H; Shirabe K
Kyobu Geka; 2018 Sep; 71(10):894-899. PubMed ID: 30310046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical Application of Esophageal High-resolution Manometry in the Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders.
van Hoeij FB; Bredenoord AJ
J Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2016 Jan; 22(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 26631942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter-observer agreement for diagnostic classification of esophageal motility disorders defined in high-resolution manometry.
Fox MR; Pandolfino JE; Sweis R; Sauter M; Abreu Y Abreu AT; Anggiansah A; Bogte A; Bredenoord AJ; Dengler W; Elvevi A; Fruehauf H; Gellersen S; Ghosh S; Gyawali CP; Heinrich H; Hemmink M; Jafari J; Kaufman E; Kessing K; Kwiatek M; Lubomyr B; Banasiuk M; Mion F; Pérez-de-la-Serna J; Remes-Troche JM; Rohof W; Roman S; Ruiz-de-León A; Tutuian R; Uscinowicz M; Valdovinos MA; Vardar R; Velosa M; Waśko-Czopnik D; Weijenborg P; Wilshire C; Wright J; Zerbib F; Menne D
Dis Esophagus; 2015; 28(8):711-9. PubMed ID: 25185507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Esophageal Motility Utilizing the Functional Lumen Imaging Probe.
Carlson DA; Kahrilas PJ; Lin Z; Hirano I; Gonsalves N; Listernick Z; Ritter K; Tye M; Ponds FA; Wong I; Pandolfino JE
Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 Dec; 111(12):1726-1735. PubMed ID: 27725650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of pediatric cricopharyngeal achalasia with high resolution manometry.
Türer ÖB; Demir N; Ciecieraga T; Günaydın RÖ; Soyer T
Turk J Pediatr; 2019; 61(5):804-809. PubMed ID: 32105018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High resolution manometry and new classification of esophageal motility disorders.
Ivashkin VT; Maev IV; Trukhmanov AS; Storonova OA; Kucheryavyi YA; Barkalova EV; Ovsepyan MA; Andreev DN; Paraskevova AB; Rumyantseva DE
Ter Arkh; 2018 May; 90(5):93-100. PubMed ID: 30701897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.
Kahrilas PJ; Bredenoord AJ; Fox M; Gyawali CP; Roman S; Smout AJ; Pandolfino JE;
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Feb; 27(2):160-74. PubMed ID: 25469569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in diagnoses after implementation of the Chicago classification for esophageal motility disorders (V3.0) for high-resolution manometry studies.
Laing P; Bress AP; Fang J; Peterson K; Adler DG; Gawron AJ
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Dec; 30(12):1-6. PubMed ID: 28881880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Differences between Chicago and traditional classifications in the diagnosis of esophageal motor disorders with high-resolution manometry and topography of esophageal pressure].
Abreu-Y Abreu AT; González Sánchez CB; Villanueva Sáenz E; Valdovinos Díaz MA
Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2010; 75(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 21169108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic evaluation of achalasia: from the whalebone to the Chicago classification.
Fisichella PM; Jalilvand A; Lebenthal A
World J Surg; 2015 Jul; 39(7):1593-7. PubMed ID: 25575460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reinterpretation of follow-up, high-resolution manometry for esophageal motility disorders based on the updated chicago classification.
Song JY; Park MI; Kim DH; Yoo CH; Park SJ; Moon W; Kim HH
Gut Liver; 2013 May; 7(3):377-81. PubMed ID: 23710322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of esophageal motor function in clinical practice.
Gyawali CP; Bredenoord AJ; Conklin JL; Fox M; Pandolfino JE; Peters JH; Roman S; Staiano A; Vaezi MF
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2013 Feb; 25(2):99-133. PubMed ID: 23336590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can high resolution manometry parameters for achalasia be obtained by conventional manometry?
Herbella FA; Patti MG
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol; 2015 Aug; 6(3):58-61. PubMed ID: 26301119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Lessons Learned.
Rohof WOA; Bredenoord AJ
Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2017 Aug; 19(8):37. PubMed ID: 28730503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pediatric esophageal high-resolution manometry: utility of a standardized protocol and size-adjusted pressure topography parameters.
Goldani HA; Staiano A; Borrelli O; Thapar N; Lindley KJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):460-7. PubMed ID: 19953088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
