419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27119519)
21. Polysubstance dependent patients display a more utilitarian profile in moral decision-making than alcohol-dependent patients, depressive patients and controls.
Kornreich C; Brevers D; Ermer E; Hanak C; Verbanck P; Campanella S; Noël X
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2013 Oct; 132(3):434-40. PubMed ID: 23540448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How Large Is the Role of Emotion in Judgments of Moral Dilemmas?
Horne Z; Powell D
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0154780. PubMed ID: 27385365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [On the necessity to distinguishing judgment from subjective choice in the cognitive neuroscience of morality].
Tassy S
Med Sci (Paris); 2011 Oct; 27(10):889-94. PubMed ID: 22027427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dopamine, religiosity, and utilitarian moral judgment.
Mueller D; Halfmann K
Soc Neurosci; 2021 Dec; 16(6):627-638. PubMed ID: 34461025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Gender differences in moral judgment and the evaluation of gender-specified moral agents.
Capraro V; Sippel J
Cogn Process; 2017 Nov; 18(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 28597324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. tDCS Over DLPFC Leads to Less Utilitarian Response in Moral-Personal Judgment.
Zheng H; Lu X; Huang D
Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():193. PubMed ID: 29632472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. For whom do the ends justify the means? Social class and utilitarian moral judgment.
Côté S; Piff PK; Willer R
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Mar; 104(3):490-503. PubMed ID: 23276265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Are 'counter-intuitive' deontological judgments really counter-intuitive? An empirical reply to.
Paxton JM; Bruni T; Greene JD
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 9(9):1368-71. PubMed ID: 23887818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Moral decision-making in polysubstance dependent individuals.
Carmona-Perera M; Verdejo-García A; Young L; Molina-Fernández A; Pérez-García M
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2012 Dec; 126(3):389-92. PubMed ID: 22749562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. At the heart of morality lies neuro-visceral integration: lower cardiac vagal tone predicts utilitarian moral judgment.
Park G; Kappes A; Rho Y; Van Bavel JJ
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1588-96. PubMed ID: 27317926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is Utilitarianism Risky? How the Same Antecedents and Mechanism Produce Both Utilitarian and Risky Choices.
Lucas BJ; Galinsky AD
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Jul; 10(4):541-8. PubMed ID: 26177954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Utilitarian moral judgment in psychopathy.
Koenigs M; Kruepke M; Zeier J; Newman JP
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2012 Aug; 7(6):708-14. PubMed ID: 21768207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Individual and Environmental Correlates of Adolescents' Moral Decision-Making in Moral Dilemmas.
Bacchini D; De Angelis G; Dragone M; Esposito C; Affuso G
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():770891. PubMed ID: 34899521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. To bridge or not to bridge: Moral Judgement in Cocaine Use Disorders, a case-control study on human morality.
Mosca A; Miuli A; Mancusi G; Chiappini S; Stigliano G; De Pasquale A; Di Petta G; Bubbico G; Pasino A; Pettorruso M; Martinotti G
Soc Neurosci; 2023 Dec; 18(5):271-281. PubMed ID: 37594151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A dose of ruthlessness: interpersonal moral judgment is hardened by the anti-anxiety drug lorazepam.
Perkins AM; Leonard AM; Weaver K; Dalton JA; Mehta MA; Kumari V; Williams SC; Ettinger U
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Aug; 142(3):612-20. PubMed ID: 23025561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The impact of one night of sleep deprivation on moral judgments.
Tempesta D; Couyoumdjian A; Moroni F; Marzano C; De Gennaro L; Ferrara M
Soc Neurosci; 2012; 7(3):292-300. PubMed ID: 21943064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Do abnormal responses show utilitarian bias?
Kahane G; Shackel N
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7185):E5; author reply E5-6. PubMed ID: 18354427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Not just bad actions: Affective concern for bad outcomes contributes to moral condemnation of harm in moral dilemmas.
Reynolds CJ; Conway P
Emotion; 2018 Oct; 18(7):1009-1023. PubMed ID: 29389202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Low levels of empathic concern predict utilitarian moral judgment.
Gleichgerrcht E; Young L
PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60418. PubMed ID: 23593213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of Instrumentality and Personal Force on Deontological and Utilitarian Inclinations in Harm-Related Moral Dilemmas.
Ludwig J; Reisenzein R; Hiemisch A
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1222. PubMed ID: 32636781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]