These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2711966)

  • 1. The effect of an unsuccessful subthreshold shock on the energy requirement for the subsequent defibrillation.
    Murakawa Y; Gliner BE; Shankar B; Thakor NV
    Am Heart J; 1989 May; 117(5):1065-9. PubMed ID: 2711966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Success rate versus defibrillation energy: temporal profile and the most efficient defibrillation threshold.
    Murakawa Y; Gliner BE; Thakor NV
    Am Heart J; 1989 Sep; 118(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 2773769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shock timing lowers transvenous defibrillation energy requirement.
    Hsu W; Lin Y; Lang DJ; Jones JL
    J Electrocardiol; 1998; 31 Suppl():35-40. PubMed ID: 9988003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using dual, triple, and quadruple electrode systems.
    Munsif AN; Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Matthew P; Giorgberidze I; Kaushik RR; Mehra R
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jun; 79(12):1632-9. PubMed ID: 9202354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pericardial effusion increases defibrillation energy requirement.
    Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Troup PJ; Chapman PD; Wetherbee JN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jun; 16(6):1227-30. PubMed ID: 7686649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using an axillary or a pectoral thoracic electrode location.
    Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Raju R; Mathew P; Mehra R
    Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2655-60. PubMed ID: 8252676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between successful defibrillation and delivered energy in open-chest dogs: reappraisal of the "defibrillation threshold" concept.
    Davy JM; Fain ES; Dorian P; Winkle RA
    Am Heart J; 1987 Jan; 113(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 3799444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The defibrillation threshold: a comparison of anesthetics and measurement methods.
    Gill RM; Sweeney RJ; Reid PR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Apr; 16(4 Pt 1):708-14. PubMed ID: 7683796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Double-pulse defibrillation using pulse separation based on the fibrillation cycle length.
    Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Sep; 5(9):761-70. PubMed ID: 7827715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of defibrillation shock energy and timing on 3-D computer model of heart.
    Province RA; Fishler MG; Thakor NV
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1993; 21(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 8434817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of ventricular fibrillation duration on defibrillation energy in dogs using bidirectional pulse discharges.
    Echt DS; Barbey JT; Black JN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Sep; 11(9):1315-23. PubMed ID: 2460837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recurrent appearance of protective zones after an unsuccessful defibrillation shock.
    Hwang C; Fan W; Chen PS
    Am J Physiol; 1996 Oct; 271(4 Pt 2):H1491-7. PubMed ID: 8897944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Initial clinical experience with endocardial defibrillation using an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator with a triple-electrode system.
    Saksena S; Tullo NG; Krol RB; Mauro AM
    Arch Intern Med; 1989 Oct; 149(10):2333-9. PubMed ID: 2802898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of multiple shocks on canine cardiac defibrillation.
    Flaker G; Schuder J; McDaniel W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 1):1580-4. PubMed ID: 1704508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct comparison of monophasic, biphasic and sequential pulse defibrillation over a single current pathway.
    Thakur R; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN
    Can J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 12(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 8608460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of flecainide on defibrillation thresholds in the anesthetized dog.
    Hernandez R; Mann DE; Breckinridge S; Williams GR; Reiter MJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Sep; 14(3):777-81. PubMed ID: 2504799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonthoracotomy internal defibrillation in dogs: threshold reduction using a subcutaneous chest wall electrode with a transvenous catheter electrode.
    Wetherbee JN; Chapman PD; Klopfenstein HS; Bach SM; Troup PJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1987 Aug; 10(2):406-11. PubMed ID: 3598010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of duration of ventricular fibrillation on defibrillation efficacy in humans.
    Winkle RA; Mead RH; Ruder MA; Smith NA; Buch WS; Gaudiani VA
    Circulation; 1990 May; 81(5):1477-81. PubMed ID: 2331763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanism of cardiac defibrillation in open-chest dogs with unipolar DC-coupled simultaneous activation and shock potential recordings.
    Witkowski FX; Penkoske PA; Plonsey R
    Circulation; 1990 Jul; 82(1):244-60. PubMed ID: 2364513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of pulse separation between two sequential biphasic shocks given over different lead configurations on ventricular defibrillation efficacy.
    Johnson EE; Alferness CA; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2267-74. PubMed ID: 1591840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.