218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27120197)
1. A Modeling Comparison of Mercury Deposition from Current Anthropogenic Mercury Emission Inventories.
Simone FD; Gencarelli CN; Hedgecock IM; Pirrone N
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 May; 50(10):5154-62. PubMed ID: 27120197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A review of global environmental mercury processes in response to human and natural perturbations: Changes of emissions, climate, and land use.
Obrist D; Kirk JL; Zhang L; Sunderland EM; Jiskra M; Selin NE
Ambio; 2018 Mar; 47(2):116-140. PubMed ID: 29388126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Atmospheric mercury in the Canadian Arctic. Part II: insight from modeling.
Dastoor A; Ryzhkov A; Durnford D; Lehnherr I; Steffen A; Morrison H
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Mar; 509-510():16-27. PubMed ID: 25604938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Historical and future trends in global source-receptor relationships of mercury.
Chen L; Zhang W; Zhang Y; Tong Y; Liu M; Wang H; Xie H; Wang X
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jan; 610-611():24-31. PubMed ID: 28802107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trend analysis from 1970 to 2008 and model evaluation of EDGARv4 global gridded anthropogenic mercury emissions.
Muntean M; Janssens-Maenhout G; Song S; Selin NE; Olivier JG; Guizzardi D; Maas R; Dentener F
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Oct; 494-495():337-50. PubMed ID: 25068706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Arctic atmospheric mercury: Sources and changes.
Dastoor A; Wilson SJ; Travnikov O; Ryjkov A; Angot H; Christensen JH; Steenhuisen F; Muntean M
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 839():156213. PubMed ID: 35623517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How closely do mercury trends in fish and other aquatic wildlife track those in the atmosphere? - Implications for evaluating the effectiveness of the Minamata Convention.
Wang F; Outridge PM; Feng X; Meng B; Heimbürger-Boavida LE; Mason RP
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jul; 674():58-70. PubMed ID: 31003088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Influence of Climate Change on Atmospheric Deposition of Mercury in the Arctic—A Model Sensitivity Study.
Hansen KM; Christensen JH; Brandt J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Sep; 12(9):11254-68. PubMed ID: 26378551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved Anthropogenic Mercury Emission Inventories for China from 1980 to 2020: Toward More Accurate Effectiveness Evaluation for the Minamata Convention.
Zhang Y; Zhang L; Cao S; Liu X; Jin J; Zhao Y
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Jun; 57(23):8660-8670. PubMed ID: 37262354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Observed decrease in atmospheric mercury explained by global decline in anthropogenic emissions.
Zhang Y; Jacob DJ; Horowitz HM; Chen L; Amos HM; Krabbenhoft DP; Slemr F; St Louis VL; Sunderland EM
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jan; 113(3):526-31. PubMed ID: 26729866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mercury Pollution in the Arctic from Wildfires: Source Attribution for the 2000s.
Kumar A; Wu S
Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Oct; 53(19):11269-11275. PubMed ID: 31479246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sedimentary mercury (Hg) in the marginal seas adjacent to Chinese high-Hg emissions: Source-to-sink, mass inventory, and accumulation history.
Kim J; Lim D; Jung D; Kang J; Jung H; Woo H; Jeong K; Xu Z
Mar Pollut Bull; 2018 Mar; 128():428-437. PubMed ID: 29571393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What are the likely changes in mercury concentration in the Arctic atmosphere and ocean under future emissions scenarios?
Schartup AT; Soerensen AL; Angot H; Bowman K; Selin NE
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Aug; 836():155477. PubMed ID: 35472347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How well do environmental archives of atmospheric mercury deposition in the Arctic reproduce rates and trends depicted by atmospheric models and measurements?
Goodsite ME; Outridge PM; Christensen JH; Dastoor A; Muir D; Travnikov O; Wilson S
Sci Total Environ; 2013 May; 452-453():196-207. PubMed ID: 23506852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Updated Global and Oceanic Mercury Budgets for the United Nations Global Mercury Assessment 2018.
Outridge PM; Mason RP; Wang F; Guerrero S; Heimbürger-Boavida LE
Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Oct; 52(20):11466-11477. PubMed ID: 30226054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interpretation of the source-specific substantive control measures of the Minamata Convention on Mercury.
You M
Environ Int; 2015 Feb; 75():1-10. PubMed ID: 25461410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and application of a regional-scale atmospheric mercury model based on WRF/Chem: a Mediterranean area investigation.
Gencarelli CN; De Simone F; Hedgecock IM; Sprovieri F; Pirrone N
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2014 Mar; 21(6):4095-109. PubMed ID: 24170496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Responses of deposition and bioaccumulation in the Great Lakes region to policy and other large-scale drivers of mercury emissions.
Perlinger JA; Urban NR; Giang A; Selin NE; Hendricks AN; Zhang H; Kumar A; Wu S; Gagnon VS; Gorman HS; Norman ES
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2018 Jan; 20(1):195-209. PubMed ID: 29360116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mercury pollution in China: implications on the implementation of the Minamata Convention.
Feng X; Li P; Fu X; Wang X; Zhang H; Lin CJ
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2022 May; 24(5):634-648. PubMed ID: 35485580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 500 years of mercury production: global annual inventory by region until 2000 and associated emissions.
Hylander LD; Meili M
Sci Total Environ; 2003 Mar; 304(1-3):13-27. PubMed ID: 12663168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
