These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27121130)

  • 1. Fluoroscopy pulse rate reduction during diagnostic and therapeutic imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: An evaluation of radiation dose, procedure complications and outcomes.
    Hansen JW; Foy A; Schmidt T; Ghahramani M; Chambers CE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 89(4):665-670. PubMed ID: 27121130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions.
    Abdelaal E; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Arsenault J; Rimac G; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Larose E; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Allende R; Ribeiro H; Costerousse O; Mongrain R; Bertrand OF;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):567-74. PubMed ID: 24746649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of Low-Dose Compared With Standard-Dose Radiation for Cardiac Catheterization and Intervention (KAR RAD Study).
    Kar S; Teleb M; Albaghdadi A; Ibrahim A; Mukherjee D
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 31(6):187-194. PubMed ID: 30865914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrospective study of patients radiation dose during cardiac catheterization procedures.
    Osei B; Xu L; Johnston A; Darko S; Darko J; Osei E
    Br J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 92(1099):20181021. PubMed ID: 31045448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ionizing radiation exposure in complex percutaneous coronary intervention: Defining local diagnostic reference levels in the catheterization laboratory.
    Costa H; Espírito-Santo M; Bispo J; Guedes J; Paulo G; Mimoso J; Palmeiro H; Baptista Gonçalves R; Vinhas H
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2024 Jul; 43(7):367-374. PubMed ID: 38336222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effective Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Cardiac Catheterization.
    Gutiérrez-Barrios A; Camacho-Galán H; Medina-Camacho F; Cañadas-Pruaño D; Jimenez-Moreno A; Calle-Perez G; Vázquez-García R
    Tex Heart Inst J; 2019 Jun; 46(3):167-171. PubMed ID: 31708696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reducing radiation exposure by lowering frame rate in children undergoing cardiac catheterization: A quality improvement study.
    Amdani SM; Ross RD; Webster PA; Turner DR; Forbes TJ; Kobayashi D
    Congenit Heart Dis; 2018 Nov; 13(6):1028-1037. PubMed ID: 30280489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship of beam angulation and radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Agarwal S; Parashar A; Bajaj NS; Khan I; Ahmad I; Heupler FA; Bunte M; Modi DK; Tuzcu EM; Kapadia SR
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):558-66. PubMed ID: 24746652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measures to reduce radiation in a modern cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Agarwal S; Parashar A; Ellis SG; Heupler FA; Lau E; Tuzcu EM; Kapadia SR
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(4):447-55. PubMed ID: 25097198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pulse fluoroscopy radiation reduction in a pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Covi SH; Whiteside W; Yu S; Zampi JD
    Congenit Heart Dis; 2015; 10(2):E43-7. PubMed ID: 24965688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. X-ray magnetic resonance fusion modality may reduce radiation exposure and contrast dose in diagnostic cardiac catheterization of congenital heart disease.
    Abu Hazeem AA; Dori Y; Whitehead KK; Harris MA; Fogel MA; Gillespie MJ; Rome JJ; Glatz AC
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Nov; 84(5):795-800. PubMed ID: 24619541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standardizing radiation dose reporting in the pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory-a multicenter study by the CCISC (Congenital Cardiovascular Interventional Study Consortium).
    Kobayashi D; Meadows J; Forbes TJ; Moore P; Javois AJ; Pedra CA; Du W; Gruenstein DH; Wax DF; Hill JA; Graziano JN; Fagan TE; Alvarez WM; Nykanen DG; Divekar AA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Nov; 84(5):785-93. PubMed ID: 24585540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Radiation Dose Reduction Technology to Improve Patient Safety During Cardiac Catheterization Interventions.
    Bracken JA; Mauti M; Kim MS; Messenger JC; Carroll JD
    J Interv Cardiol; 2015 Oct; 28(5):493-7. PubMed ID: 26381865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center.
    Kagiyama K; Mitsutake Y; Ueno T; Sakai S; Nakamura T; Yamaji K; Ishimatsu T; Sasaki M; Chibana H; Itaya N; Sasaki KI; Fukumoto Y
    Heart Vessels; 2021 Jul; 36(7):955-964. PubMed ID: 33502572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation dose reduction in the cardiac catheterization laboratory utilizing a novel protocol.
    Wassef AW; Hiebert B; Ravandi A; Ducas J; Minhas K; Vo M; Kass M; Parmar G; Hussain F
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):550-7. PubMed ID: 24746655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Effect of Reducing Fluoroscopy Pulse Rates on Visibility of Devices and Radiation Dose in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention].
    Yoshida M; Niwa M; Takahashi Y; Kuratani Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2024 May; 80(5):519-529. PubMed ID: 38569842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image noise reduction technology reduces radiation in a radial-first cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Gunja A; Pandey Y; Xie H; Wolska BM; Shroff AR; Ardati AK; Vidovich MI
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 28089778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiation Reduction in the Pediatric Catheterization Laboratory Using a Novel Imaging System.
    Manu S; Suntharos P; Boyle GJ; Wang L; Prieto LR
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jan; 30(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 29035845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation reduction in a modern catheterization laboratory: A single-center experience.
    Shekhar S; Ajay A; Agrawal A; Kumar A; Kaur M; Isogai T; Saad A; Abushouk AI; Abdelfattah O; Lak H; Farwati M; Ahuja K; Verma BR; Wunderle K; Ellis S; Khatri J; Ziada K; Krishnaswamy A; Kapadia S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Oct; 100(4):575-584. PubMed ID: 36073017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).
    Michael TT; Alomar M; Papayannis A; Mogabgab O; Patel VG; Rangan BV; Luna M; Hastings JL; Grodin J; Abdullah S; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1138-44. PubMed ID: 24139930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.