These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27122074)
1. [How representative is the healthcare assessment website Zorgkaart Nederland? The evaluation of medical specialists by patients in the Netherlands]. Stehmann TA; Goudriaan WA; In 't Veen JC; Kollen BJ; Verheyen CC Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2016; 160():A9870. PubMed ID: 27122074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Do online ratings reflect structural differences in healthcare? The example of German physician-rating websites]. Meszmer N; Jaegers L; Schöffski O; Emmert M Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Apr; 131-132():73-80. PubMed ID: 29331281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results. Bardach NS; Hibbard JH; Greaves F; Dudley RA J Med Internet Res; 2015 May; 17(5):e102. PubMed ID: 25934100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Harvesting the wisdom of the crowd: using online ratings to explore care experiences in regions. Hendrikx RJP; Spreeuwenberg MD; Drewes HW; Struijs JN; Ruwaard D; Baan CA BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Oct; 18(1):801. PubMed ID: 30342518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An analysis of online evaluations on a physician rating website: evidence from a German public reporting instrument. Emmert M; Meier F J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e157. PubMed ID: 23919987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlations between care users' and the healthcare inspectorate's ratings of the quality of care in long-term care homes. Palimetaki F; Woutersen K; Pot AM BMJ Open Qual; 2023 Mar; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 36941009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of comprehensive oncogenetics training interventions for general practitioners, evaluated at multiple performance levels. Houwink EJ; Muijtjens AM; van Teeffelen SR; Henneman L; Rethans JJ; Jacobi F; van der Jagt L; Stirbu I; van Luijk SJ; Stumpel CT; Meijers-Heijboer HE; van der Vleuten C; Cornel MC; Dinant GJ PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0122648. PubMed ID: 25837634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of Intensified Supervision by Health Care Inspectorates on Online Patient Ratings of Hospitals: A Multilevel Study of More Than 43,000 Online Ratings. Kool RB; Kleefstra SM; Borghans I; Atsma F; van de Belt TH J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jul; 18(7):e198. PubMed ID: 27421302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluations of dentists on a German physician rating Website: an analysis of the ratings. Emmert M; Halling F; Meier F J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jan; 17(1):e15. PubMed ID: 25582914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Websites of Norwegian hospitals: do they meet national guidelines and patient's expectations? Norem J; Moen MA J Telemed Telecare; 2004; 10(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 15532132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [What do you think of Thuisarts.nl? Experiences after 3 years of www.Thuisarts.nl]. Drenthen T; Beijaert RP; Jansen PW; Korevaar JC; Smeele IJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2014; 158():A8282. PubMed ID: 25515391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation. Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Understanding specialist sharing: A mixed-method exploration in an increasingly price-competitive hospital market. Westra D; Angeli F; Jatautaitė E; Carree M; Ruwaard D Soc Sci Med; 2016 Aug; 162():133-42. PubMed ID: 27348610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the Dutch language version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-NL). Haerkens MH; van Leeuwen W; Sexton JB; Pickkers P; van der Hoeven JG BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Aug; 16(a):385. PubMed ID: 27528393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Emmert M; Meszmer N; Sander U J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e254. PubMed ID: 27644135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Health care providers on the World Wide Web: quality of presentations of surgical departments in Germany. Stausberg J; Fuchs J; Hüsing J; Hirche H Med Inform Internet Med; 2001; 26(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 11583405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How Do Countries' Health Information Systems Perform in Assessing Asylum Seekers' Health Situation? Developing a Health Information Assessment Tool on Asylum Seekers (HIATUS) and Piloting It in Two European Countries. Bozorgmehr K; Goosen S; Mohsenpour A; Kuehne A; Razum O; Kunst AE Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Aug; 14(8):. PubMed ID: 28786927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Requirements analysis of information services for patients on a general practitioner's website--patient and general practitioner's perspectives. Prins AH; Abu-Hanna A Methods Inf Med; 2007; 46(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 18066411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]