825 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27123681)
1. Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
Hollingworth A; Beck VM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 27123681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can you have multiple attentional templates? Large-scale replications of Van Moorselaar, Theeuwes, and Olivers (2014) and Hollingworth and Beck (2016).
Frătescu M; Van Moorselaar D; Mathôt S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2700-2709. PubMed ID: 31309532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple representations in visual working memory simultaneously guide attention: The type of memory-matching representation matters.
Fan L; Sun M; Xu M; Li Z; Diao L; Zhang X
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():126-137. PubMed ID: 30471521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?
van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1450-64. PubMed ID: 24730738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention.
Bahle B; Beck VM; Hollingworth A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):992-1011. PubMed ID: 29629781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
Kerzel D; Witzel C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple states in visual working memory: Evidence from oculomotor capture by memory-matching distractors.
Beck VM; Vickery TJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1340-1346. PubMed ID: 31037604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual Working Memory Load Disrupts Template-guided Attentional Selection during Visual Search.
Berggren N; Eimer M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1902-1915. PubMed ID: 30125222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exploring the contributions of spatial and non-spatial working memory to priming of pop-out.
Ahn J; Patel TN; Buetti S; Lleras A
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1012-1026. PubMed ID: 28176214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The architecture of working memory: Features from multiple remembered objects produce parallel, coactive guidance of attention in visual search.
Bahle B; Thayer DD; Mordkoff JT; Hollingworth A
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 May; 149(5):967-983. PubMed ID: 31589068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between visual attention and visual working memory encoding: A dissociation between covert and overt orienting.
Tas AC; Luck SJ; Hollingworth A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1121-1138. PubMed ID: 26854532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Competition in saccade target selection reveals attentional guidance by simultaneously active working memory representations.
Beck VM; Hollingworth A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):225-230. PubMed ID: 28134550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concurrent guidance of attention by multiple working memory items: Behavioral and computational evidence.
Zhou C; Lorist MM; Mathôt S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):2950-2962. PubMed ID: 32394070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
Kristjánsson T; Kristjánsson Á
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():108-115. PubMed ID: 29275949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Task-dependent effects of voluntary space-based and involuntary feature-based attention on visual working memory.
Qian J; Zhang K; Lei Q; Han Y; Li W
Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1304-1319. PubMed ID: 30840142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
Foerster RM; Schneider WX
Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual search with varying versus consistent attentional templates: Effects on target template establishment, comparison, and guidance.
Goldstein RR; Beck MR
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1086-1102. PubMed ID: 29620379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Strategic inhibition of distractors with visual working memory contents after involuntary attention capture.
Lu J; Tian L; Zhang J; Wang J; Ye C; Liu Q
Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):16314. PubMed ID: 29176675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
