248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27123753)
1. Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm.
Brothers T; Traxler MJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1894-1906. PubMed ID: 27123753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Word skipping in Chinese reading: The role of high-frequency preview and syntactic felicity.
Zang C; Du H; Bai X; Yan G; Liversedge SP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):603-620. PubMed ID: 31246059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of high- and low-frequency previews and sentential fit on word skipping during reading.
Angele B; Laishley AE; Rayner K; Liversedge SP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1181-203. PubMed ID: 24707791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Parafoveal syntactic processing from word N + 2 during reading: the case of gender-specific German articles.
Schwalm L; Radach R
Psychol Res; 2023 Nov; 87(8):2511-2532. PubMed ID: 37209214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Grammatical predictions in Spanish-English bilinguals and Spanish-language learners.
de Los Santos G; Boland JE; Lewis RL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):907-925. PubMed ID: 31599625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence for simultaneous syntactic processing of multiple words during reading.
Snell J; Meeter M; Grainger J
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173720. PubMed ID: 28278305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of contextual plausibility on word skipping during reading.
Veldre A; Reichle ED; Wong R; Andrews S
Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104184. PubMed ID: 31954289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
Plummer P; Rayner K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness.
Veldre A; Andrews S
Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):519-528. PubMed ID: 27418260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Processing the in the parafovea: are articles skipped automatically?
Angele B; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):649-62. PubMed ID: 22799285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Semantic preview benefit in English: Individual differences in the extraction and use of parafoveal semantic information.
Veldre A; Andrews S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):837-54. PubMed ID: 26595070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Parafoveal-foveal overlap can facilitate ongoing word identification during reading: evidence from eye movements.
Angele B; Tran R; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):526-38. PubMed ID: 22866764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How readers process syntactic input depends on their goals.
Vandendaele A; Declerck M; Grainger J; Snell J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Feb; 203():103006. PubMed ID: 31955032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading.
Morris RK
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jan; 20(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 8138791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Context effects in visual word recognition: lexical relatedness and syntactic context.
Schriefers H; Friederici AD; Rose U
Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1292-303. PubMed ID: 9847552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
Hagoort P
J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Skipping syntactically illegal the previews: The role of predictability.
Abbott MJ; Angele B; Ahn YD; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1703-14. PubMed ID: 26076325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parafoveal processing in reading.
Schotter ER; Angele B; Rayner K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 22042596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prosodic boundaries delay the processing of upcoming lexical information during silent sentence reading.
Luo Y; Yan M; Zhou X
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):915-30. PubMed ID: 22774853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of syntactic expectations on reading comprehension is malleable and strategic: An eye-tracking study of English dative alternation.
Bridgwater E; Kyröläinen AJ; Kuperman V
Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Sep; 73(3):179-192. PubMed ID: 31081657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
