These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27123753)

  • 21. Capitalization interacts with syntactic complexity.
    Cutter MG; Martin AE; Sturt P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1146-1164. PubMed ID: 31621360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Skipping of the very-high-frequency structural particle de () in Chinese reading.
    Zang C; Zhang M; Bai X; Yan G; Angele B; Liversedge SP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jan; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 27998212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The thematic hierarchy in sentence comprehension: A study on the interaction between verb class and word order in Spanish.
    Gattei CA; Dickey MW; Wainselboim AJ; París L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):1981-2007. PubMed ID: 25529525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of syntax on reading in neglect dyslexia.
    Friedmann N; Tzailer-Gross L; Gvion A
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Aug; 49(10):2803-16. PubMed ID: 21679719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.
    Schotter ER; Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2039-2067. PubMed ID: 27732044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading.
    Staub A; Grant M; Clifton C; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):806-14. PubMed ID: 19379050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Word skipping: Effects of word length, predictability, spelling and reading skill.
    Slattery TJ; Yates M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jan; 71(1):250-259. PubMed ID: 28856970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: evidence against parafoveal lexical activation.
    Johnson RL; Dunne MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):191-212. PubMed ID: 22060141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Zhou X; Jiang X; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lou K; Zhan W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 20138898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lexically-mediated syntactic priming effects in comprehension: Sources of facilitation.
    Tooley KM; Pickering MJ; Traxler MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2176-2196. PubMed ID: 30744509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects of emotional word semantics in reading Chinese sentences: evidence from eye movements.
    Yan M; Sommer W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1237-43. PubMed ID: 25581226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What are the costs of degraded parafoveal previews during silent reading?
    Vasilev MR; Slattery TJ; Kirkby JA; Angele B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Mar; 44(3):371-386. PubMed ID: 28661179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Influence of Globally Ungrammatical Local Syntactic Constraints on Real-Time Sentence Comprehension: Evidence From the Visual World Paradigm and Reading.
    Kamide Y; Kukona A
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Nov; 42(8):2976-2998. PubMed ID: 30341784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Parafoveal preprocessing of word initial trigrams during reading in adults and children.
    Pagán A; Blythe HI; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Mar; 42(3):411-32. PubMed ID: 26348198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of verb repetition in cumulative structural priming in comprehension.
    Fine AB; Jaeger TF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1362-76. PubMed ID: 26962961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.
    Bonhage CE; Mueller JL; Friederici AD; Fiebach CJ
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():33-47. PubMed ID: 26003489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.
    Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):555-68. PubMed ID: 2142952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The time-course of lexical and structural processes in sentence comprehension.
    Tily H; Fedorenko E; Gibson E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):910-27. PubMed ID: 19746299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.