These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27123753)

  • 41. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.
    Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):555-68. PubMed ID: 2142952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The time-course of lexical and structural processes in sentence comprehension.
    Tily H; Fedorenko E; Gibson E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):910-27. PubMed ID: 19746299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dissociating parafoveal preview benefit and parafovea-on-fovea effects during reading: A combined eye tracking and EEG study.
    Niefind F; Dimigen O
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Dec; 53(12):1784-1798. PubMed ID: 27680711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Is semantic preview benefit due to relatedness or plausibility?
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):939-52. PubMed ID: 26752734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Phonological typicality and sentence processing.
    Tanenhaus MK; Hare M
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Mar; 11(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 17207653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Lexical predictability exerts robust effects on fixation duration, but not on initial landing position during reading.
    Vainio S; Hyönä J; Pajunen A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 19261580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Parafoveal preview effects in reading unspaced text.
    Drieghe D; Fitzsimmons G; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1701-1716. PubMed ID: 28967779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Integration of parafoveal orthographic information during foveal word reading: beyond the sub-lexical level?
    Snell J; Vitu F; Grainger J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):1984-1996. PubMed ID: 27457807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Is orthographic information from multiple parafoveal words processed in parallel: An eye-tracking study.
    Cutter MG; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1550-1567. PubMed ID: 28383965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: a study with fixation-related brain potentials.
    Dimigen O; Kliegl R; Sommer W
    Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):381-93. PubMed ID: 22521255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The role of executive control in resolving grammatical number conflict in sentence comprehension.
    Vandierendonck A; Loncke M; Hartsuiker RJ; Desmet T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):759-778. PubMed ID: 28056625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of Lexical Variables on Silent Reading Comprehension in Individuals With Aphasia: Evidence From Eye Tracking.
    DeDe G
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 60(9):2589-2602. PubMed ID: 28863409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The word grouping hypothesis and eye movements during reading.
    Drieghe D; Pollatsek A; Staub A; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1552-60. PubMed ID: 18980414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Stress matters revisited: a boundary change experiment.
    Breen M; Clifton C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(10):1896-909. PubMed ID: 23425386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Parafoveal processing of word n + 2 during reading: do the preceding words matter?
    Angele B; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1210-20. PubMed ID: 21553996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The influence of semantic and syntactic context constraints on lexical selection and integration in spoken-word comprehension as revealed by ERPs.
    van den Brink D; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):1068-84. PubMed ID: 15298793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The mechanisms of prediction updating that impact the processing of upcoming word: An event-related potential study on sentence comprehension.
    Szewczyk JM; Wodniecka Z
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1714-1734. PubMed ID: 32297790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. It's early: event-related potential evidence for initial interaction of syntax and prosody in speech comprehension.
    Eckstein K; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1696-711. PubMed ID: 17014374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Event-based plausibility immediately influences on-line language comprehension.
    Matsuki K; Chow T; Hare M; Elman JL; Scheepers C; McRae K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):913-34. PubMed ID: 21517222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of syntactic prominence on eye movements during reading.
    Birch S; Rayner K
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Sep; 38(6):740-52. PubMed ID: 20852237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.