These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

799 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27126291)

  • 1. [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].
    Thümmler R; Liebscher T; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 27126291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evaluation of hearing aid rehabilitation using the Freiburg Monosyllabic Test].
    Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 27299893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The Freiburg monosyllable word test in postoperative cochlear implant diagnostics].
    Hey M; Brademann G; Ambrosch P
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):601-7. PubMed ID: 27393292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Test-retest reliability of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test].
    Winkler A; Holube I
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):564-71. PubMed ID: 27286728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Phonemic balance of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test].
    Exter M; Winkler A; Holube I
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):557-63. PubMed ID: 27299891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The Freiburg speech intelligibility test : A pillar of speech audiometry in German-speaking countries].
    Hoth S
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):540-8. PubMed ID: 27259640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of the perceptual equivalence of test lists in the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test].
    Baljić I; Winkler A; Schmidt T; Holube I
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):572-83. PubMed ID: 27418349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The adaptive Freiburg monosyllabic test in noise : Development of a procedure and comparison of the results with the Oldenburg sentence test].
    Memmeler T; Schönweiler R; Wollenberg B; Löhler J
    HNO; 2019 Feb; 67(2):118-125. PubMed ID: 30519714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The age effect in evaluation of hearing aid benefits by speech audiometry].
    Müller A; Hocke T; Hoppe U; Mir-Salim P
    HNO; 2016 Mar; 64(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 26801889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Examination of a training effect in the Freiburg monosyllabic test].
    Schmidt T; Baljić I
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):584-8. PubMed ID: 27435273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Speech audiometry for indication of conventional and implantable hearing aids].
    Hoppe U; Hast A
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 27921115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Use of Freiburg monosyllabic test words in the contemporary German language : Currentness of the test words].
    Steffens T
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):549-56. PubMed ID: 27286726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test in background noise].
    Löhler J; Akcicek B; Pilnik M; Saager-Post K; Dazert S; Biedron S; Oeken J; Mürbe D; Löbert J; Laszig R; Wesarg T; Langer C; Plontke S; Rahne T; Machate U; Noppeney R; Schultz K; Plinkert P; Hoth S; Praetorius M; Schlattmann P; Meister EF; Pau HW; Ehrt K; Hagen R; Shehata-Dieler W; Cebulla M; Walther LE; Ernst A
    HNO; 2013 Jul; 61(7):586-91. PubMed ID: 23076435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Speech audiometric outcome parameters in clinical trials on hearing improvement].
    Müller J; Plontke SK; Rahne T
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):211-218. PubMed ID: 27933349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The benefit method: fitting hearing aids in noise.
    Svard I; Spens KE; Back L; Ahlner BH; Barrenas ML
    Noise Health; 2005; 7(29):12-23. PubMed ID: 17478965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Indication for and verification of hearing aid benefit using modern methods of speech audiometry in German].
    Kollmeier B; Lenarz T; Winkler A; Zokoll MA; Sukowski H; Brand T; Wagener KC
    HNO; 2011 Oct; 59(10):1012-21. PubMed ID: 21769581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of different speech intelligibility tests in German language (Freiburg speech test vs. Göttingen sentence test and monosyllabic rhyme test)].
    Sukowski H; Brand T; Wagener KC; Kollmeier B
    HNO; 2009 Mar; 57(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 18696020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Implementation of the new quality assurance agreement for the fitting of hearing aids in daily practice. Part 2: New diagnostic aspects of speech audiometry].
    Löhler J; Akcicek B; Wollenberg B; Schönweiler R
    HNO; 2014 Sep; 62(9):667-81; quiz 682. PubMed ID: 25185973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech Perception and Information-Carrying Capacity for Hearing Aid Users of Different Ages.
    Hoppe U; Hocke T; Müller A; Hast A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21 Suppl 1():16-20. PubMed ID: 27806356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.