393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27126686)
1. Determining the psychometric properties of the Enhancing Decision-making Assessment in Midwifery (EDAM) measure in a cross cultural context.
Jefford E; Jomeen J; Martin CR
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Apr; 16():95. PubMed ID: 27126686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R).
Hollins Martin CJ; Martin CR
Midwifery; 2014 Jun; 30(6):610-9. PubMed ID: 24252712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and Initial Psychometric Testing of the Midwifery Practice Climate Scale - Part 2.
Thumm EB; Shaffer J; Meek P
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2020 Sep; 65(5):651-659. PubMed ID: 32893959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Mother's Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM) scale: Patient-led development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to evaluate experience of maternity care.
Vedam S; Stoll K; Martin K; Rubashkin N; Partridge S; Thordarson D; Jolicoeur G;
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171804. PubMed ID: 28231285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study.
Daemers DOA; van Limbeek EBM; Wijnen HAA; Nieuwenhuijze MJ; de Vries RG
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Oct; 17(1):345. PubMed ID: 28985725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Midwives׳ clinical reasoning during second stage labour: Report on an interpretive study.
Jefford E; Fahy K
Midwifery; 2015 May; 31(5):519-25. PubMed ID: 25662470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The development and psychometric evaluation of the Perceptions of Empowerment in Midwifery Scale.
Matthews A; Scott PA; Gallagher P
Midwifery; 2009 Jun; 25(3):327-35. PubMed ID: 17597268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adaptation and psychometric testing of the Practice Environment Scale for use with midwives.
Pallant JF; Dixon L; Sidebotham M; Fenwick J
Women Birth; 2016 Feb; 29(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 26264165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a First Peoples-led cultural capability measurement tool: A pilot study with midwifery students.
West R; Wrigley S; Mills K; Taylor K; Rowland D; Creedy DK
Women Birth; 2017 Jun; 30(3):236-244. PubMed ID: 28188040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and psychometric testing of the scales for measuring maternal satisfaction in normal and caesarean birth.
Gungor I; Beji NK
Midwifery; 2012 Jun; 28(3):348-57. PubMed ID: 21546142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cue acquisition: A feature of Malawian midwives decision making process to support normality during the first stage of labour.
Chodzaza E; Haycock-Stuart E; Holloway A; Mander R
Midwifery; 2018 Mar; 58():56-63. PubMed ID: 29306097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and psychometric testing of the Carter Assessment of Critical Thinking in Midwifery (Preceptor/Mentor version).
Carter AG; Creedy DK; Sidebotham M
Midwifery; 2016 Mar; 34():141-149. PubMed ID: 26719194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Towards a relational model of decision-making in midwifery care.
Noseworthy DA; Phibbs SR; Benn CA
Midwifery; 2013 Jul; 29(7):e42-8. PubMed ID: 22877765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Giving midwives a voice - Qualitative perspectives of an 'empowering decision-making workshop'.
Jefford E; Nolan S; Jomeen J; Maier B
J Clin Nurs; 2022 Mar; 31(5-6):592-600. PubMed ID: 34114284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How optimal caseload midwifery can modify predictors for preterm birth in young women: Integrated findings from a mixed methods study.
Allen J; Kildea S; Stapleton H
Midwifery; 2016 Oct; 41():30-38. PubMed ID: 27498186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A mixed methods review to develop and confirm a framework for assessing midwifery practice in perinatal mental health.
Wadephul F; Jarrett PM; Jomeen J; Martin CR
J Adv Nurs; 2018 Oct; 74(10):2258-2272. PubMed ID: 29989193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the implementation of the model of integrated and humanised midwifery health services in Chile.
Binfa L; Pantoja L; Ortiz J; Gurovich M; Cavada G; Foster J
Midwifery; 2016 Apr; 35():53-61. PubMed ID: 27060401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Critical thinking skills in midwifery practice: Development of a self-assessment tool for students.
Carter AG; Creedy DK; Sidebotham M
Midwifery; 2017 Jul; 50():184-192. PubMed ID: 28472740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Decision-making theories and their usefulness to the midwifery profession both in terms of midwifery practice and the education of midwives.
Jefford E; Fahy K; Sundin D
Int J Nurs Pract; 2011 Jun; 17(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 21605264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How midwives facilitate informed decisions in the third stage of labour - an exploration through portraiture.
Kloester J; Brand G; Willey S
Midwifery; 2023 Dec; 127():103868. PubMed ID: 37931464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
