These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27126874)
1. Inducing mental set constrains procedural flexibility and conceptual understanding in mathematics. DeCaro MS Mem Cognit; 2016 Oct; 44(7):1138-48. PubMed ID: 27126874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relationship between adults' conceptual understanding of inversion and associativity. Dubé AK; Robinson KM Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 20384420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spontaneous usage of different shortcuts based on the commutativity principle. Gaschler R; Vaterrodt B; Frensch PA; Eichler A; Haider H PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74972. PubMed ID: 24086413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving conceptual and procedural knowledge: The impact of instructional content within a mathematics lesson. Rittle-Johnson B; Fyfe ER; Loehr AM Br J Educ Psychol; 2016 Dec; 86(4):576-591. PubMed ID: 27502760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceptual support promotes strategy generation: Evidence from equation solving. Alibali MW; Crooks NM; McNeil NM Br J Dev Psychol; 2018 Jun; 36(2):153-168. PubMed ID: 28857223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An alternative time for telling: when conceptual instruction prior to problem solving improves mathematical knowledge. Fyfe ER; DeCaro MS; Rittle-Johnson B Br J Educ Psychol; 2014 Sep; 84(Pt 3):502-19. PubMed ID: 24494594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In pursuit of knowledge: comparing self-explanations, concepts, and procedures as pedagogical tools. Matthews P; Rittle-Johnson B J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Sep; 104(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 18937952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Developing procedural flexibility: are novices prepared to learn from comparing procedures? Rittle-Johnson B; Star JR; Durkin K Br J Educ Psychol; 2012 Sep; 82(Pt 3):436-55. PubMed ID: 22881048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigating the role of attention in the identification of associativity shortcuts using a microgenetic measure of implicit shortcut use. Eaves J; Gilmore C; Attridge N Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Jul; 73(7):1017-1035. PubMed ID: 31986980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Children's understanding of the arithmetic concepts of inversion and associativity. Robinson KM; Ninowski JE; Gray ML J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Aug; 94(4):349-62. PubMed ID: 16674969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Individual differences in conceptual and procedural fraction understanding: the role of abilities and school experience. Hallett D; Nunes T; Bryant P; Thorpe CM J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Dec; 113(4):469-86. PubMed ID: 22995445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conceptual knowledge of the associativity principle: A review of the literature and an agenda for future research. Eaves J; Gilmore C; Attridge N Trends Neurosci Educ; 2021 Jun; 23():100152. PubMed ID: 34006361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conceptual knowledge of arithmetic for Chinese- and Canadian-educated adults. Robinson KM; Beatch JA Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Dec; 70(4):335-342. PubMed ID: 27176819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Children's understanding of addition and subtraction concepts. Robinson KM; Dubé AK J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Aug; 103(4):532-45. PubMed ID: 19167015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Limitations to teaching children 2 + 2 = 4: typical arithmetic problems can hinder learning of mathematical equivalence. McNeil NM Child Dev; 2008; 79(5):1524-37. PubMed ID: 18826540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benefits of practicing 4 = 2 + 2: nontraditional problem formats facilitate children's understanding of mathematical equivalence. McNeil NM; Fyfe ER; Petersen LA; Dunwiddie AE; Brletic-Shipley H Child Dev; 2011; 82(5):1620-33. PubMed ID: 21793817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A microgenetic study of the multiplication and division inversion concept. Robinson KM; Dubé AK Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Sep; 63(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 19739902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of conceptual understanding in children's addition problem solving. Canobi KH; Reeve RA; Pattison PE Dev Psychol; 1998 Sep; 34(5):882-91. PubMed ID: 9779735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conceptual Knowledge, Procedural Knowledge, and Metacognition in Routine and Nonroutine Problem Solving. Braithwaite DW; Sprague L Cogn Sci; 2021 Oct; 45(10):e13048. PubMed ID: 34606130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Number words in young children's conceptual and procedural knowledge of addition, subtraction and inversion. Canobi KH; Bethune NE Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):675-86. PubMed ID: 18621361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]