These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2712688)

  • 1. An evaluation of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory as a discriminator of primary organic and primary psychogenic impotence in diabetic males.
    Jefferson TW; Glaros A; Spevack M; Boaz TL; Murray FT
    Arch Sex Behav; 1989 Apr; 18(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 2712688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New concept parameters of RigiScan in differentiation of vascular erectile dysfunction: is it a useful test?
    Basar MM; Atan A; Tekdogan UY
    Int J Urol; 2001 Dec; 8(12):686-91. PubMed ID: 11851769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychometric differentiation of biogenic and psychogenic impotence.
    Martin LM; Rodgers DA; Montague DK
    Arch Sex Behav; 1983 Dec; 12(6):475-85. PubMed ID: 6667107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MMPI evaluation of erectile dysfunction: failure of organic vs. psychogenic decision rules.
    Levenson H; Olkin R; Herzoff N; deLancy M
    J Clin Psychol; 1986 Sep; 42(5):752-4. PubMed ID: 3760207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The etiology of impotence in 327 diabetic male adults].
    Zheng H; Li G; Fan W; Zhang X; Chen S; Wang J; Nian X; Wang Y; Pan X
    Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Aug; 38(8):546-9. PubMed ID: 11798695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of duplex ultrasonography and nocturnal penile tumescence in evaluation of impotence.
    Allen RP; Engel RM; Smolev JK; Brendler CB
    J Urol; 1994 Jun; 151(6):1525-9. PubMed ID: 8189562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychometric differentiation of psychogenic and organic erectile disorders.
    Hatch JP; de la Peña AM; Fisher JG
    J Urol; 1987 Oct; 138(4):781-3. PubMed ID: 3656533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation and treatment of sexual dysfunction in men with diabetes mellitus.
    Murray FT; Geisser ME; Cohen MS; Williams RS
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1991 Nov; 78(11):757-61. PubMed ID: 1765757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impotence in diabetics: organic versus psychogenic factors.
    el-Bayoumi M; el-Sherbini O; Mostafa M
    Urology; 1984 Nov; 24(5):459-63. PubMed ID: 6495456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychological screening of impotence with Finney's MMPI-derived Impotence Scale.
    Craig RJ; Cannon B; Olson RE
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Dec; 77(3 Pt 1):1019-26. PubMed ID: 8559904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impotence: are the newer diagnostic methods a necessity?
    Saypol DC; Peterson GA; Howards SS; Yazel JJ
    J Urol; 1983 Aug; 130(2):260-2. PubMed ID: 6876271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gonadal dysfunction in diabetic men with organic impotence.
    Murray FT; Wyss HU; Thomas RG; Spevack M; Glaros AG
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 1987 Jul; 65(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 3584393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Mechanisms of diabetic impotence. 25 cases].
    Buvat J; Lemaire A; Buvat-Herbaut M; Marcolin G; Quittelier E; Fontaine P; Guieu JD; Dehaene JL; Fossati P
    Presse Med; 1987 Apr; 16(13):611-4. PubMed ID: 2952972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unreliability of nocturnal penile tumescence recording and MMPI profiles in assessment of impotence.
    Marshall P; Morales A; Surridge D
    Urology; 1981 Feb; 17(2):136-9. PubMed ID: 7467014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Theoretical and technical problems in the measurement of nocturnal penile tumescence for the differential diagnosis of impotence.
    Wasserman MD; Pollak CP; Spielman AJ; Weitzman ED
    Psychosom Med; 1980 Nov; 42(6):575-85. PubMed ID: 7465743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of nocturnal penile tumescence in differentiating between organic and psychogenic impotence: the first stage of validation.
    Marshall P; Surridge D; Delva N
    Arch Sex Behav; 1981 Feb; 10(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 7212992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nocturnal penile tumescence predicting response to intracorporeal pharmacological erection testing.
    Allen RP; Brendler CB
    J Urol; 1988 Sep; 140(3):518-22. PubMed ID: 3411665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic tests for impotence: a comparison of papaverine injection with the penile-brachial index and nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring.
    Abber JC; Lue TF; Orvis BR; McClure RD; Williams RD
    J Urol; 1986 May; 135(5):923-5. PubMed ID: 3959242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discrimination between psychogenic and organic erectile dysfunction.
    Speckens AE; Hengeveld MW; Lycklama à Nijeholt GA; van Hemert AM; Hawton KE
    J Psychosom Res; 1993; 37(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 8463990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of the Florida Sexual History Questionnaire to differentiate primary organic from primary psychogenic impotence.
    Geisser ME; Murray FT; Cohen MS; Shea PJ; Addeo RR
    J Androl; 1993; 14(4):298-303. PubMed ID: 8226309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.