These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27127022)
21. Histologic evaluation of human bone integration on machined and sandblasted acid-etched titanium surfaces in type IV bone. Grassi S; Piattelli A; Ferrari DS; Figueiredo LC; Feres M; Iezzi G; Shibli JA J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 17410906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits. Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence on proliferation and adhesion of human gingival fibroblasts from different titanium surface decontamination treatments: An in vitro study. Cao J; Wang T; Pu Y; Tang Z; Meng H Arch Oral Biol; 2018 Mar; 87():204-210. PubMed ID: 29306778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Human gingival fibroblast integrin subunit expression on titanium implant surfaces. Oates TW; Maller SC; West J; Steffensen B J Periodontol; 2005 Oct; 76(10):1743-50. PubMed ID: 16253097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical and histomorphometric properties of four different mini-implant surfaces. Yadav S; Upadhyay M; Roberts WE Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 25681126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of H2O2/HCl heat treatment of implants on in vivo peri-implant bone formation. Yang GL; He FM; Zhao SS; Wang XX; Zhao SF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1020-8. PubMed ID: 19216270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cell adhesion and in vivo osseointegration of sandblasted/acid etched/anodized dental implants. Kim MH; Park K; Choi KH; Kim SH; Kim SE; Jeong CM; Huh JB Int J Mol Sci; 2015 May; 16(5):10324-36. PubMed ID: 25955650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Surface modification and its effect on attachment, spreading, and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts. Zhang F; Huang Y; Li X; Zhao S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1183-92. PubMed ID: 22167422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Roughness, Wettability, and SEM Features between Sandblasted Acid-Etched and Oxidized Titanium Dental Implants. Chhabra K; Rajasekar A J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2024; 34(4):57-63. PubMed ID: 38842233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The influence of titanium surfaces in cultures of neonatal rat calvarial osteoblast-like cells: an immunohistochemical study. Aybar B; Emes Y; Atalay B; Tanrikulu S; Kaya AS; Işsever H; Ceyhan T; Bilir A Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 19212240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Relationship between the surface energy and the histologic results of different titanium surfaces. Gehrke SA; Zizzari VL; Iaculli F; Mortellaro C; Tetè S; Piattelli A J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):863-7. PubMed ID: 24820714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Roughness affects the response of human fibroblasts and macrophages to sandblasted abutments. Romero-Gavilán F; Arias-Mainer C; Cerqueira A; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Bernabeu-Mira JC; García-Arnáez I; Elortza F; Muriach M; Gurruchaga M; Goñi I; Suay J Biomed Eng Online; 2024 Jul; 23(1):68. PubMed ID: 39020369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [The role of surface roughness in promoting osteointegration]. Nasatzky E; Gultchin J; Schwartz Z Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2003 Jul; 20(3):8-19, 98. PubMed ID: 14515625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The response of osteoblast-like SaOS-2 cells to modified titanium surfaces. Pivodova V; Frankova J; Dolezel P; Ulrichova J Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1386-94. PubMed ID: 24066332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstructured dental implant surfaces and cell behaviour in an explant model of osseointegration. A scanning electron microscopic study. Sammons RL; Lumbikanonda N; Gross M; Cantzler P Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 16307572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Focal adhesion contact formation by fibroblasts cultured on surface-modified dental implants: an in vitro study. Grössner-Schreiber B; Herzog M; Hedderich J; Dück A; Hannig M; Griepentrog M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Dec; 17(6):736-45. PubMed ID: 17092235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]