BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27127551)

  • 1. Bayesian Estimation and Testing in Random Effects Meta-analysis of Rare Binary Adverse Events.
    Bai O; Chen M; Wang X
    Stat Biopharm Res; 2016; 8(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 27127551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Bayesian meta-analytic approach for safety signal detection in randomized clinical trials.
    Odani M; Fukimbara S; Sato T
    Clin Trials; 2017 Apr; 14(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 28059578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-Analysis of Rare Binary Adverse Event Data.
    Bhaumik DK; Amatya A; Normand SL; Greenhouse J; Kaizar E; Neelon B; Gibbons RD
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2012 Jun; 107(498):555-567. PubMed ID: 23734068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An integrative shrinkage estimator for random-effects meta-analysis of rare binary events.
    Li L; Bai O; Wang X
    Contemp Clin Trials Commun; 2018 Jun; 10():141-147. PubMed ID: 30023448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian estimation and testing in random-effects meta-analysis of rare binary events allowing for flexible group variability.
    Zhang M; Barth J; Lim J; Wang X
    Stat Med; 2023 May; 42(11):1699-1721. PubMed ID: 36869639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analysis of rare binary events in treatment groups with unequal variability.
    Li L; Wang X
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):263-274. PubMed ID: 28760075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prior distributions for variance parameters in a sparse-event meta-analysis of a few small trials.
    Pateras K; Nikolakopoulos S; Roes KCB
    Pharm Stat; 2021 Jan; 20(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 32767452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Meta-analysis of binary outcomes via generalized linear mixed models: a simulation study.
    Bakbergenuly I; Kulinskaya E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):70. PubMed ID: 29973146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonparametric estimation of the random effects distribution for the risk or rate ratio in rare events meta-analysis with the arm-based and contrast-based approaches.
    Sangnawakij P; Böhning D; Holling H; Jansen K
    Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(4):706-730. PubMed ID: 38111986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of hypothesis tests for homogeneity in meta-analysis with focus on rare binary events.
    Zhang C; Wang X; Chen M; Wang T
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jul; 12(4):408-428. PubMed ID: 34231330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Likelihood-Based Random-Effect Meta-Analysis of Binary Events.
    Amatya A; Bhaumik DK; Normand SL; Greenhouse J; Kaizar E; Neelon B; Gibbons RD
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):984-1004. PubMed ID: 24918874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An assessment of estimation methods for generalized linear mixed models with binary outcomes.
    Capanu M; Gönen M; Begg CB
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(26):4550-66. PubMed ID: 23839712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods in random-effects network meta-analysis of binary data.
    Seide SE; Jensen K; Kieser M
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):363-378. PubMed ID: 31955519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bayesian sensitivity study of risk difference in the meta-analysis of binary outcomes from sparse data.
    Vázquez-Polo FJ; Moreno E; Negrín MA; Martel M
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2015 Apr; 15(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 25673174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data.
    Ju K; Lin L; Chu H; Cheng LL; Xu C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 32539721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis of rare adverse events in randomized clinical trials: Bayesian and frequentist methods.
    Hong H; Wang C; Rosner GL
    Clin Trials; 2021 Feb; 18(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 33258698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing various Bayesian random-effects models for pooling randomized controlled trials with rare events.
    Yao M; Jia Y; Mei F; Wang Y; Zou K; Li L; Sun X
    Pharm Stat; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38628051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accounting for individual-specific variation in habitat-selection studies: Efficient estimation of mixed-effects models using Bayesian or frequentist computation.
    Muff S; Signer J; Fieberg J
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Jan; 89(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 31454066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.