BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1957 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27129045)

  • 41. Comparison of anterior cervical fusion after two-level discectomy or single-level corpectomy: sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, graft collapse, and adjacent-level ossification.
    Park Y; Maeda T; Cho W; Riew KD
    Spine J; 2010 Mar; 10(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19850532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with implantable titanium cage: initial impressions, patient outcomes and comparison to fusion with allograft.
    Moreland DB; Asch HL; Clabeaux DE; Castiglia GJ; Czajka GA; Lewis PJ; Egnatchik JG; Cappuccino A; Huynh L
    Spine J; 2004; 4(2):184-91; discussion 191. PubMed ID: 15016396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparative study of outcomes between allograft intervertebral disc transplantation and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective cohort study at least 5 years of follow-up.
    Zhang J; Ruan D; Xuan A; He Q; Zhang C; Xu C; Zhu C; Zhou Q
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Oct; 32(10):3561-3574. PubMed ID: 37330937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Long-term Outcomes of the US FDA IDE Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing PCM Cervical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
    Phillips FM; Geisler FH; Gilder KM; Reah C; Howell KM; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 May; 40(10):674-83. PubMed ID: 25955086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Complications of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.
    Vaidya R; Carp J; Sethi A; Bartol S; Craig J; Les CM
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1257-65. PubMed ID: 17387522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up.
    Garrido BJ; Taha TA; Sasso RC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):367-71. PubMed ID: 20087223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption study.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Shaffrey ME; Argires PJ; Nian H; Harrell FE
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Nov; 23(5):558-573. PubMed ID: 26230424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.
    Sasso RC; Anderson PA; Riew KD; Heller JG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Sep; 93(18):1684-92. PubMed ID: 21938372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Prospective, multicenter clinical trial comparing the M6-C compressible cervical disc with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level degenerative cervical radiculopathy: 5-year results of an FDA investigational device exemption study.
    Phillips FM; Coric D; Sasso R; Lanman T; Lavelle W; Lauryssen C; Albert T; Cammisa F; Milam RA
    Spine J; 2024 Feb; 24(2):219-230. PubMed ID: 37951477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Is lumbar facet fusion biomechanically equivalent to lumbar posterolateral onlay fusion?
    Toth JM; Foley KT; Wang M; Seim HB; Simon Turner A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 May; 26(5):586-593. PubMed ID: 28156207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zou S; Gao J; Xu B; Lu X; Han Y; Meng H
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):985-997. PubMed ID: 27314663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a prospective study of complications.
    Malham GM; Parker RM; Ellis NJ; Blecher CM; Chow FY; Claydon MH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):851-60. PubMed ID: 25279655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Cervical Total Disk Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Fusion: Results at 48 Months Follow-up.
    Hisey MS; Bae HW; Davis RJ; Gaede S; Hoffman G; Kim KD; Nunley PD; Peterson D; Rashbaum RF; Stokes J; Ohnmeiss DD
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 May; 28(4):E237-43. PubMed ID: 25310394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device: a clinical and radiological study: Clinical article.
    Njoku I; Alimi M; Leng LZ; Shin BJ; James AR; Bhangoo S; Tsiouris AJ; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):529-37. PubMed ID: 25105338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison among perfect-C®, zero-P®, and plates with a cage in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease.
    Noh SH; Zhang HY
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Jan; 19(1):33. PubMed ID: 29368613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Radiological and clinical outcomes of 3-level cervical disc arthroplasty.
    Chang HK; Huang WC; Tu TH; Fay LY; Kuo CH; Chang CC; Wu CL; Lirng JF; Wu JC; Cheng H; Hsu SM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Nov; 32(2):174-181. PubMed ID: 31675702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.
    Burkus JK; Transfeldt EE; Kitchel SH; Watkins RG; Balderston RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(21):2396-408. PubMed ID: 12438990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
    Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
    Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study.
    Vaccaro A; Beutler W; Peppelman W; Marzluff JM; Highsmith J; Mugglin A; DeMuth G; Gudipally M; Baker KJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):2227-39. PubMed ID: 24335629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Differences between C3-4 and other subaxial levels of cervical disc arthroplasty: more heterotopic ossification at the 5-year follow-up.
    Chang PY; Chang HK; Wu JC; Huang WC; Fay LY; Tu TH; Wu CL; Cheng H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 May; 24(5):752-9. PubMed ID: 26824584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 98.