640 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27129625)
1. Peer review in medical journals: Beyond quality of reports towards transparency and public scrutiny of the process.
Vercellini P; Buggio L; Viganò P; Somigliana E
Eur J Intern Med; 2016 Jun; 31():15-9. PubMed ID: 27129625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study.
Wager E; Parkin EC; Tamber PS
BMC Med; 2006 May; 4():13. PubMed ID: 16734897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?
Kravitz RL; Franks P; Feldman MD; Gerrity M; Byrne C; Tierney WM
PLoS One; 2010 Apr; 5(4):e10072. PubMed ID: 20386704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals.
Hirst A; Altman DG
PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e35621. PubMed ID: 22558178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Blind versus nonblind review: survey of selected medical journals.
Cleary JD; Alexander B
Drug Intell Clin Pharm; 1988; 22(7-8):601-2. PubMed ID: 3416750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conflicting interests involved in the process of publishing in biomedical journals.
Igi R
J BUON; 2015; 20(5):1373-7. PubMed ID: 26537088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Editors Should Declare Conflicts of Interest.
Teixeira da Silva JA; Dobránszki J; Bhar RH; Mehlman CT
J Bioeth Inq; 2019 Jun; 16(2):279-298. PubMed ID: 31016681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal.
Snell L; Spencer J
Med Educ; 2005 Jan; 39(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 15612905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Policies, practices, and attitudes of North American medical journal editors.
Wilkes MS; Kravitz RL
J Gen Intern Med; 1995 Aug; 10(8):443-50. PubMed ID: 7472701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policies and Practices in Peer-reviewed Biomedical Journals.
Cooper RJ; Gupta M; Wilkes MS; Hoffman JR
J Gen Intern Med; 2006 Dec; 21(12):1248-52. PubMed ID: 17105524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conflict of interest in the peer review process: A survey of peer review reports.
Makarem A; Mroué R; Makarem H; Diab L; Hassan B; Khabsa J; Akl EA
PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0286908. PubMed ID: 37289790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models.
Kowalczuk MK; Dudbridge F; Nanda S; Harriman SL; Patel J; Moylan EC
BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008707. PubMed ID: 26423855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?
Al-Khatib A; Teixeira da Silva JA
Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Feb; 25(1):293-321. PubMed ID: 28905258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impartial judgment by the "gatekeepers" of science: fallibility and accountability in the peer review process.
Hojat M; Gonnella JS; Caelleigh AS
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2003; 8(1):75-96. PubMed ID: 12652170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Vibrant Community of Readers, Authors and Reviewers: A Medical Editors' Necessity and a Challenge for Medical Education.
Escada P; Donato H; Villanueva T
Acta Med Port; 2019 Mar; 32(3):171-172. PubMed ID: 30946784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators.
Justice AC; Cho MK; Winker MA; Berlin JA; Rennie D
JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 9676668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger".
Vinther S; Nielsen OH; Rosenberg J; Keiding N; Schroeder TV
Dan Med J; 2012 Aug; 59(8):A4479. PubMed ID: 22849979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.].
Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G
Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary.
Tarkang EE; Bain LE
Pan Afr Med J; 2019; 32():119. PubMed ID: 31223409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
