These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 271299)

  • 1. Cavosurface design and marginal leakage of composite resin restorations.
    Eliasson ST; Hill GL
    Oper Dent; 1977; 2(2):55-8. PubMed ID: 271299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of enamel cavosurface configuration on marginal leakage in Class V composite resin restorations.
    Marzouk MA; Bhaiji AH
    Am J Dent; 1989 Aug; 2(4):165-9. PubMed ID: 2637015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin-composite restorations.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ; Gruythuysen RJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(4-5):310-4. PubMed ID: 8258575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Polymerization contraction stresses of resin-based composite restorations within beveled cavity preparations of Class I restorations.
    Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 12797575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of pre- and postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of amalgam and composite restorations.
    Ulukapi H; Benderli Y; Ulukapi I
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):505-8. PubMed ID: 12946068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Ultrastructure of the surface of the margin between a composite resin and dentin].
    Szabó J; Trombitás K; Szabó I
    Fogorv Sz; 1985 May; 78(5):147-51. PubMed ID: 3860406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect Class II composite resin restorations: an in vitro evaluation.
    Dietschi D; Scampa U; Campanile G; Holz J
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 7568723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of cavosurface margin configuration of Class V cavity preparations on microleakage of composite resin restorations.
    Bagheri M; Ghavamnasiri M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 18264534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cavosurface design for composite resin cavity preparations.
    Boston DW
    Penn Dent J (Phila); 1983; 84(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 6201815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [In vitro study of the marginal closure in adhesive fillings].
    Szabó J; Szabó I; Trombitás K
    Fogorv Sz; 1989 May; 82(5):129-32. PubMed ID: 2721754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Class 5 composite resin restorations: margin configurations and the distance from the CEJ.
    Hall LH; Cochran MA; Swartz ML
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(6):246-50. PubMed ID: 8152997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin.
    Barnes DM; Blank LW; Thompson VP; Holston AM; Gingell JC
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Feb; 22(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 2068249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Marginal leakage with 131INa in class IV composite resin restorations with enamel acid etching and subjected to dynamic loading (author's transl)].
    de Moraes Rôla AJ; Galan Junior J; Mondelli J; Coradazzi JL
    Estomatol Cult; 1975; 9(1):147-24. PubMed ID: 801874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Excellence in class II direct composite restorations.
    Shuman I
    Dent Today; 2007 Apr; 26(4):102, 104-5. PubMed ID: 17486784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of differences in amalgam restorations on examination standardization.
    Cobb DS
    J Dent Educ; 1997 Dec; 61(12):938-40. PubMed ID: 9457136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro assessment of the effect of Scotchbond on the marginal leakage of class II composite restorations in primary molars.
    Holan G; Fuks AB; Grajower R; Chosack A
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1986; 53(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 3519710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The importance of proximal curing in posterior composite resin restorations.
    Lutz F; Krejci I; Barbakow F
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Sep; 23(9):605-7. PubMed ID: 1287711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.