BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

759 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27130061)

  • 1. Added value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT for staging of advanced gastric cancer: Comparison with contrast-enhanced MDCT.
    Kawanaka Y; Kitajima K; Fukushima K; Mouri M; Doi H; Oshima T; Niwa H; Kaibe N; Sasako M; Tomita T; Miwa H; Hirota S
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):989-95. PubMed ID: 27130061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Should 18F-FDG PET/CT Be Routinely Performed in the Clinical Staging of Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma?
    Perlaza P; Ortín J; Pagès M; Buxó E; Fernández-Esparrach G; Colletti PM; Rubello D; Mayoral M; Sánchez N; Ruiz C; Ginés A; Fuster D
    Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 43(6):402-410. PubMed ID: 29485442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between 18F-FDG PET/MRI and MDCT for the assessment of preoperative staging and resectability of gastric cancer.
    Lee DH; Kim SH; Joo I; Hur BY; Han JK
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1085-91. PubMed ID: 27161056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Whole-body
    Gajjala SR; Hulikal N; Kadiyala S; Kottu R; Kalawat T
    Indian J Med Res; 2018 Mar; 147(3):256-262. PubMed ID: 29923514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 18F-FDG PET/CT role in staging of gastric carcinomas: comparison with conventional contrast enhancement computed tomography.
    Altini C; Niccoli Asabella A; Di Palo A; Fanelli M; Ferrari C; Moschetta M; Rubini G
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 May; 94(20):e864. PubMed ID: 25997066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Additional Value of Integrated
    Yoo J; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Joo I; Lee DH
    Korean J Radiol; 2021 May; 22(5):714-724. PubMed ID: 33660461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Added value of [
    Yoon I; Bae JS; Yoo J; Lee DH; Kim SH
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):7834-7844. PubMed ID: 33768290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Usefulness of combined PET/CT to assess regional lymph node involvement in gastric cancer.
    Park K; Jang G; Baek S; Song H
    Tumori; 2014; 100(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 24852866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT as a post-treatment tool in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: comparison with FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT.
    Suenaga Y; Kitajima K; Ishihara T; Sasaki R; Otsuki N; Nibu K; Minamikawa T; Kiyota N; Sugimura K
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Apr; 26(4):1018-30. PubMed ID: 26188656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic performance of
    Ishiguchi H; Ito S; Kato K; Sakurai Y; Kawai H; Fujita N; Abe S; Narita A; Nishio N; Muramatsu H; Takahashi Y; Naganawa S
    Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 32(5):348-362. PubMed ID: 29667143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The value of PET/CT for preoperative staging of advanced gastric cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT.
    Kim EY; Lee WJ; Choi D; Lee SJ; Choi JY; Kim BT; Kim HS
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 20226612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of FLT-PET/CT and CECT in gastric cancer diagnosis.
    Staniuk T; Małkowski B; Śrutek E; Szlęzak P; Zegarski W
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jul; 41(7):1349-56. PubMed ID: 26826089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT with optimal cut-offs of maximum standardized uptake value according to size for diagnosis of regional lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.
    Bae SU; Won KS; Song BI; Jeong WK; Baek SK; Kim HW
    Cancer Imaging; 2018 Sep; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 30217167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.
    Kauhanen SP; Komar G; Seppänen MP; Dean KI; Minn HR; Kajander SA; Rinta-Kiikka I; Alanen K; Borra RJ; Puolakkainen PA; Nuutila P; Ovaska JT
    Ann Surg; 2009 Dec; 250(6):957-63. PubMed ID: 19687736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictive Value of
    Song BI; Kim HW; Won KS
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):2174-2181. PubMed ID: 28432480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lymph node staging of gastric cancer using (18)F-FDG PET: a comparison study with CT.
    Yun M; Lim JS; Noh SH; Hyung WJ; Cheong JH; Bong JK; Cho A; Lee JD
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Oct; 46(10):1582-8. PubMed ID: 16204706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    Lehmann K; Eshmuminov D; Bauerfeind P; Gubler C; Veit-Haibach P; Weber A; Abdul-Rahman H; Fischer M; Reiner C; Schneider PM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jan; 43(1):196-202. PubMed ID: 27692533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in initial staging of patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma with an emphasis on M staging.
    Mittal BR; Manohar K; Kashyap R; Bhattacharya A; Singh B; Singh G
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2011; 14(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 21761015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic value of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer patients.
    Wu Y; Li P; Zhang H; Shi Y; Wu H; Zhang J; Qian Y; Li C; Yang J
    Int J Cancer; 2013 Jan; 132(2):E37-47. PubMed ID: 22890912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of (18) F-FDG-PET/CT imaging in oral cavity cancer patients following surgical reconstruction.
    Müller J; Hüllner M; Strobel K; Huber GF; Burger IA; Haerle SK
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Aug; 125(8):1861-8. PubMed ID: 25892275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.