174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27130370)
1. Astigmatic Vector Analysis of Posterior Corneal Surface: A Comparison Among Healthy, Forme Fruste, and Overt Keratoconic Corneas.
Freitas Gde O; Ambrósio R; Ramos I; Lopes B; Valbon Bde F; Botteon C; Alve MR
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 167():65-71. PubMed ID: 27130370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distribution of Anterior and Posterior Corneal Astigmatism in Eyes With Keratoconus.
Naderan M; Rajabi MT; Zarrinbakhsh P
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 167():79-87. PubMed ID: 27066720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ocular, corneal, and internal aberrations in eyes with keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and healthy eyes.
Naderan M; Jahanrad A; Farjadnia M
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1565-1573. PubMed ID: 28647782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Posterior corneal elevation and back difference corneal elevation in diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients.
Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Ozulken K; Ozyol E; Akıncı A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23820305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Role of Ocular Response Analyzer in Differentiation of Forme Fruste Keratoconus From Corneal Astigmatism.
Kirgiz A; Karaman Erdur S; Atalay K; Gurez C
Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Mar; 45(2):83-87. PubMed ID: 30265255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the morphological and biomechanical characteristics of keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and normal corneas.
Guo LL; Tian L; Cao K; Li YX; Li N; Yang WQ; Jie Y
Semin Ophthalmol; 2021 Nov; 36(8):671-678. PubMed ID: 33734947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Characteristics of Corneal Astigmatism of Anterior and Posterior Surface in a Normal Control Group and Patients With Keratoconus.
Shajari M; Friderich S; Pour Sadeghian M; Schmack I; Kohnen T
Cornea; 2017 Apr; 36(4):457-462. PubMed ID: 28129291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of subclinical keratoconus by using corneal anterior and posterior surface aberrations and thickness spatial profiles.
Bühren J; Kook D; Yoon G; Kohnen T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jul; 51(7):3424-32. PubMed ID: 20164452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Value of Corneal Epithelial and Stromal Thickness Distribution Profiles in Forme Fruste Keratoconus and Subclinical Keratoconus.
Toprak I; Vega A; Alió Del Barrio JL; Espla E; Cavas F; Alió JL
Cornea; 2021 Jan; 40(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 32769675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Higher-order aberrations due to the posterior corneal surface in patients with keratoconus.
Nakagawa T; Maeda N; Kosaki R; Hori Y; Inoue T; Saika M; Mihashi T; Fujikado T; Tano Y
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 50(6):2660-5. PubMed ID: 19029032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corneal epithelial thickness mapping using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography for detection of form fruste keratoconus.
Temstet C; Sandali O; Bouheraoua N; Hamiche T; Galan A; El Sanharawi M; Basli E; Laroche L; Borderie V
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Apr; 41(4):812-20. PubMed ID: 25840306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discriminant Value of Custom Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Derivatives in Forme Fruste Keratoconus.
Luz A; Lopes B; Hallahan KM; Valbon B; Fontes B; Schor P; Dupps WJ; Ambrósio R
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 164():14-21. PubMed ID: 26743618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early, Forme Fruste keratoconus and normal thin cornea, evaluation of sensitive parameters by combined Placido Scheimpflug topography.
Gharieb HM; Abdelatif MK; Gharieb HM; Othman IS
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 37731321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Scheimpflug and swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography in normal and keratoconus eyes.
Ghoreishi SM; Mortazavi SAA; Abtahi ZA; Abtahi MA; Sonbolestan SA; Abtahi SH; Mohammadinia M; Isfahani KN
Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 37(4):965-971. PubMed ID: 27671494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement centration and zone diameter in anterior, posterior and total corneal astigmatism in keratoconus.
Fredriksson A; Behndig A
Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 95(8):826-833. PubMed ID: 28692136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The false positive rates for detecting keratoconus and potential ectatic corneal conditions when evaluating astigmatic eyes with Scheimpflug Technology.
Henriquez MA; Hadid M; Moctezuma C; Izquierdo L; Binder PS
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2022 Sep; 32(5):2532-2546. PubMed ID: 35313744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discrimination between keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and normal eyes using a novel OCT-based tomographer.
Saad A; Debellemanière G; Zeboulon P; Rizk M; Rouger H; Mazharian A; Grise-Dulac A; Panthier C; Gatinel D
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 Nov; 49(11):1092-1097. PubMed ID: 37532249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus.
Smadja D; Santhiago MR; Mello GR; Krueger RR; Colin J; Touboul D
J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 23557226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of a scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser and tomography in the early detection of subclinical keratoconus in chinese patients.
Liu Y; Zhang Y; Chen Y
BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):339. PubMed ID: 34544392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of posterior corneal flat meridian and astigmatism amount on the total corneal astigmatism estimated from anterior corneal measurements.
Eom Y; Kang SY; Kim HM; Song JS
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov; 252(11):1769-77. PubMed ID: 25038911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
