299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27130929)
1. Comparing Breast Cancer Multiparameter Tests in the OPTIMA Prelim Trial: No Test Is More Equal Than the Others.
Bartlett JM; Bayani J; Marshall A; Dunn JA; Campbell A; Cunningham C; Sobol MS; Hall PS; Poole CJ; Cameron DA; Earl HM; Rea DW; Macpherson IR; Canney P; Francis A; McCabe C; Pinder SE; Hughes-Davies L; Makris A; Stein RC;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Sep; 108(9):. PubMed ID: 27130929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. OPTIMA prelim: a randomised feasibility study of personalised care in the treatment of women with early breast cancer.
Stein RC; Dunn JA; Bartlett JM; Campbell AF; Marshall A; Hall P; Rooshenas L; Morgan A; Poole C; Pinder SE; Cameron DA; Stallard N; Donovan JL; McCabe C; Hughes-Davies L; Makris A;
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Feb; 20(10):xxiii-xxix, 1-201. PubMed ID: 26867046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of Information Analysis of Multiparameter Tests for Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer: The OPTIMA Prelim Trial.
Hall PS; Smith A; Hulme C; Vargas-Palacios A; Makris A; Hughes-Davies L; Dunn JA; Bartlett JMS; Cameron DA; Marshall A; Campbell A; Macpherson IR; Dan Rea ; Francis A; Earl H; Morgan A; Stein RC; McCabe C;
Value Health; 2017 Dec; 20(10):1311-1318. PubMed ID: 29241890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic analysis.
Harnan S; Tappenden P; Cooper K; Stevens J; Bessey A; Rafia R; Ward S; Wong R; Stein RC; Brown J
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(30):1-328. PubMed ID: 31264581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical experience of using Oncotype DX as an additional treatment decision tool in early breast cancer - a retrospective analysis from 5 Greek institutions.
Markopoulos C; Xepapadakis G; Venizelos V; Tsiftsoglou A; Misitzis J; Panoussis D; Antonopoulou Z; Stathoulopoulou M; Zobolas V; Gogas H
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 38(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 22425282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of EndoPredict and EPclin With Oncotype DX Recurrence Score for Prediction of Risk of Distant Recurrence After Endocrine Therapy.
Buus R; Sestak I; Kronenwett R; Denkert C; Dubsky P; Krappmann K; Scheer M; Petry C; Cuzick J; Dowsett M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Nov; 108(11):. PubMed ID: 27400969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers of Endocrine Responsiveness for Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer.
Ma CX; Bose R; Ellis MJ
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 882():125-54. PubMed ID: 26987533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Population-based Study of Prosigna-PAM50 and Outcome Among Postmenopausal Women With Estrogen Receptor-positive and HER2-negative Operable Invasive Lobular or Ductal Breast Cancer.
Lænkholm AV; Jensen MB; Eriksen JO; Roslind A; Buckingham W; Ferree S; Nielsen T; Ejlertsen B
Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(4):e423-e432. PubMed ID: 32253134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective Evaluation of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay for Breast Cancer Decision-Making in Ontario.
Levine MN; Julian JA; Bedard PL; Eisen A; Trudeau ME; Higgins B; Bordeleau L; Pritchard KI
J Clin Oncol; 2016 Apr; 34(10):1065-71. PubMed ID: 26598746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of PAM50 risk of recurrence score with oncotype DX and IHC4 for predicting risk of distant recurrence after endocrine therapy.
Dowsett M; Sestak I; Lopez-Knowles E; Sidhu K; Dunbier AK; Cowens JW; Ferree S; Storhoff J; Schaper C; Cuzick J
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 31(22):2783-90. PubMed ID: 23816962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gene expression profiling and expanded immunohistochemistry tests to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer management: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Ward S; Scope A; Rafia R; Pandor A; Harnan S; Evans P; Wyld L
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Oct; 17(44):1-302. PubMed ID: 24088296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Prospective Comparison of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score and the PAM50-Based Prosigna in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer.
Alvarado MD; Prasad C; Rothney M; Cherbavaz DB; Sing AP; Baehner FL; Svedman C; Markopoulos CJ
Adv Ther; 2015 Dec; 32(12):1237-47. PubMed ID: 26610383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Agreement in risk prediction between the 21-gene recurrence score assay (Oncotype DX®) and the PAM50 breast cancer intrinsic Classifier™ in early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
Kelly CM; Bernard PS; Krishnamurthy S; Wang B; Ebbert MT; Bastien RR; Boucher KM; Young E; Iwamoto T; Pusztai L
Oncologist; 2012; 17(4):492-8. PubMed ID: 22418568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oncotype DX and Prosigna in breast cancer patients: A comparison study.
Abdelhakam DA; Hanna H; Nassar A
Cancer Treat Res Commun; 2021; 26():100306. PubMed ID: 33444922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Limitations in predicting PAM50 intrinsic subtype and risk of relapse score with Ki67 in estrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer.
Fernandez-Martinez A; Pascual T; Perrone G; Morales S; de la Haba J; González-Rivera M; Galván P; Zalfa F; Amato M; Gonzalez L; Prats M; Rojo F; Manso L; Paré L; Alonso I; Albanell J; Vivancos A; González A; Matito J; González S; Fernandez P; Adamo B; Muñoz M; Viladot M; Font C; Aya F; Vidal M; Caballero R; Carrasco E; Altomare V; Tonini G; Prat A; Martin M
Oncotarget; 2017 Mar; 8(13):21930-21937. PubMed ID: 28423537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concordance of breast cancer biomarker status between routine immunohistochemistry/in situ hybridization and Oncotype DX qRT-PCR with investigation of discordance, a study of 591 cases.
Sechrist H; Glasgow A; Bomeisl P; Gilmore H; Harbhajanka A
Hum Pathol; 2020 Oct; 104():54-65. PubMed ID: 32758491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discordance between oncotype DX recurrence score and RSPC for predicting residual risk of recurrence in ER-positive breast cancer.
Dodson A; Okonji D; Assersohn L; Rigg A; Sheri A; Turner N; Smith I; Parton M; Dowsett M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Feb; 168(1):249-258. PubMed ID: 29128896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The West German Study Group Breast Cancer Intrinsic Subtype study: a prospective multicenter decision impact study utilizing the Prosigna assay for adjuvant treatment decision-making in estrogen-receptor-positive, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer.
Wuerstlein R; Sotlar K; Gluz O; Otremba B; von Schumann R; Witzel I; Schindlbeck C; Janni W; Schem C; Bauerfeind I; Hasmueller S; Tesch H; Paulenz A; Ghali N; Orujov E; Kates RE; Cowens W; Hornberger J; Pelz E; Harbeck N
Curr Med Res Opin; 2016 Jul; 32(7):1217-24. PubMed ID: 26971372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk of recurrence estimates with IHC4+C are tolerant of variations in staining and scoring: an analytical validity study.
Dodson A; Zabaglo L; Yeo B; Miller K; Smith I; Dowsett M
J Clin Pathol; 2016 Feb; 69(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 26281860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histological grade provides significant prognostic information in addition to breast cancer subtypes defined according to St Gallen 2013.
Ehinger A; Malmström P; Bendahl PO; Elston CW; Falck AK; Forsare C; Grabau D; Rydén L; Stål O; Fernö M;
Acta Oncol; 2017 Jan; 56(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 27762648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
