These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27130960)

  • 1. A protocol for the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: Item scoring rules, Rater training, and outcome accuracy with data on its application in a clinical trial.
    Rohan KJ; Rough JN; Evans M; Ho SY; Meyerhoff J; Roberts LM; Vacek PM
    J Affect Disord; 2016 Aug; 200():111-8. PubMed ID: 27130960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter-rater reliability of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as a diagnostic and outcome measure of depression in primary care.
    Morriss R; Leese M; Chatwin J; Baldwin D;
    J Affect Disord; 2008 Dec; 111(2-3):204-13. PubMed ID: 18374987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The new GRID Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression demonstrates excellent inter-rater reliability for inexperienced and experienced raters before and after training.
    Tabuse H; Kalali A; Azuma H; Ozaki N; Iwata N; Naitoh H; Higuchi T; Kanba S; Shioe K; Akechi T; Furukawa TA
    Psychiatry Res; 2007 Sep; 153(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 17445908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the standard and structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale in depressed geriatric inpatients.
    Moberg PJ; Lazarus LW; Mesholam RI; Bilker W; Chuy IL; Neyman I; Markvart V
    Am J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2001; 9(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 11156750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of computer-administered clinical rating scale: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale assessment with Interactive Voice Response technology--Japanese version.
    Kunugi H; Koga N; Hashikura M; Noda T; Shimizu Y; Kobayashi T; Yamanaka J; Kanemoto N; Higuchi T
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2013 May; 67(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 23683156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sources of unreliability in depression ratings.
    Kobak KA; Brown B; Sharp I; Levy-Mack H; Wells K; Ockun F; Williams JB
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2009 Feb; 29(1):82-5. PubMed ID: 19142114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The inter-rater reliability of the Japanese version of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, clinician version.
    Yamamoto N; Kawakami S; Sato K; Takimura T; Inagaki A; Inada T
    Hum Psychopharmacol; 2011 Apr; 26(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 21678492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rating scales in general practice depression: psychometric analyses of the clinical interview for depression and the Hamilton rating scale.
    Bech P; Paykel E; Sireling L; Yiend J
    J Affect Disord; 2015 Jan; 171():68-73. PubMed ID: 25285901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inter-rater reliability of ratings on the six-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6) obtained using the Simplified Negative and Positive Symptoms Interview (SNAPSI).
    Kølbæk P; Blicher AB; Buus CW; Feller SG; Holm T; Dines D; O'Leary KM; Sørensen RS; Opler M; Correll CU; Mors O; Bech P; Østergaard SD
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2018 Aug; 72(6):431-436. PubMed ID: 30037286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The GRID-HAMD: standardization of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.
    Williams JB; Kobak KA; Bech P; Engelhardt N; Evans K; Lipsitz J; Olin J; Pearson J; Kalali A
    Int Clin Psychopharmacol; 2008 May; 23(3):120-9. PubMed ID: 18408526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychometric evaluation of a 6-item Chinese version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Mokken scaling and item analysis.
    Lee CP; Liu CY; Hung CI
    Asia Pac Psychiatry; 2017 Sep; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 28585368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of reliability in the clinical evaluation of depressive symptoms among multiple investigators in a multicenter clinical trial.
    Baca-García E; Blanco C; Sáiz-Ruiz J; Rico F; Diaz-Sastre C; Cicchetti DV
    Psychiatry Res; 2001 Jun; 102(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 11408055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inter-rater reliability of Hamilton depression rating scale using video- recorded interviews - Focus on rater-blinding.
    Prasad MK; Udupa K; Kishore KR; Thirthalli J; Sathyaprabha TN; Gangadhar BN
    Indian J Psychiatry; 2009; 51(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 19881046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The inter-rater reliability of the Japanese version of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) using a structured interview guide for MADRS (SIGMA).
    Takahashi N; Tomita K; Higuchi T; Inada T
    Hum Psychopharmacol; 2004 Apr; 19(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 15079853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and reliability of the HAM-D/MADRS interview: an integrated depression symptom rating scale.
    Iannuzzo RW; Jaeger J; Goldberg JF; Kafantaris V; Sublette ME
    Psychiatry Res; 2006 Nov; 145(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 17049379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating rater competency for CNS clinical trials.
    Targum SD
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2006 Jun; 26(3):308-10. PubMed ID: 16702896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rater Training for a Multi-Site, International Clinical Trial: What Mood Symptoms may be most Difficult to Rate?
    Sajatovic M; Gaur R; Tatsuoka C; De Santi S; Lee N; Laredo J; Tripathi S
    Psychopharmacol Bull; 2011 Sep; 44(3):5-14. PubMed ID: 27738359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression: A Critical Review of Clinimetric Properties of Different Versions.
    Carrozzino D; Patierno C; Fava GA; Guidi J
    Psychother Psychosom; 2020; 89(3):133-150. PubMed ID: 32289809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A structured interview version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: evidence of reliability and versatility of administration.
    Potts MK; Daniels M; Burnam MA; Wells KB
    J Psychiatr Res; 1990; 24(4):335-50. PubMed ID: 2090831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifying depressive symptomatology: inter-rater reliability and inter-item correlations.
    Kørner A; Nielsen BM; Eschen F; Møller-Madsen S; Stender A; Christensen EM; Aggernaes H; Kastrup M; Larsen JK
    J Affect Disord; 1990 Oct; 20(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 2148329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.