These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27131782)

  • 1. Concurrent progressive ratio schedules: Effects of reinforcer probability on breakpoint and response allocation.
    Jarmolowicz DP; Sofis MJ; Darden AC
    Behav Processes; 2016 Jul; 128():103-7. PubMed ID: 27131782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concurrent progressive-ratio schedules: built-in controls in the study of delayed reward efficacy.
    Jarmolowicz DP; Hudnall JL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Aug; 233():172-6. PubMed ID: 24979725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of progressive hold and progressive response schedules of reinforcement.
    Alvarez-Sekely CS; Toscano-Zapien AL; Salles-Ize P; Zepeda-Ruiz WA; Lopez-Guzman MA; Velazquez-Martinez DN
    Behav Processes; 2023 Feb; 205():104822. PubMed ID: 36669746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of central 5-hydroxytryptamine depletion on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.
    Mobini S; Chiang TJ; Ho MY; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2000 Nov; 152(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 11140331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.
    Mobini S; Body S; Ho MY; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E; Deakin JF; Anderson IM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Mar; 160(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 11889498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of delays and ratio requirements in self-control choice.
    Grossbard CL; Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 May; 45(3):305-15. PubMed ID: 3711777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of changeover delays on local choice.
    Gomes-Ng S; Landon J; Elliffe D; Bensemann J; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2018 May; 150():36-46. PubMed ID: 29499344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transitional and steady-state choice behavior under an adjusting-delay schedule.
    Torres LV; Araújo Sda C; Sanchez CM; Body S; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jan; 95(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 21541116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Delay-amount tradeoffs in choices by pigeons and rats: hyperbolic versus exponential discounting.
    Mazur JE; Biondi DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Mar; 91(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 19794834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pair housing, but not using a controlled reinforcer frequency procedure, attenuates the modulatory effect of probability presentation order on amphetamine-induced changes in risky choice.
    Yates JR; Ellis AL; Evans KE; Kappesser JL; Lilly KM; Mbambu P; Sutphin TG
    Behav Brain Res; 2020 Jul; 390():112669. PubMed ID: 32417278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M; Elliffe DM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16156136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining the discriminative and strengthening effects of reinforcers in concurrent schedules.
    Boutros N; Elliffe D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Sep; 96(2):227-41. PubMed ID: 21909166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jan; 55(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 2002302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fix and sample with rats in the dynamics of choice.
    Aparicio CF; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 16903492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rats' choices with token stimuli in concurrent variable-interval schedules.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Sep; 102(2):198-212. PubMed ID: 25130299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Distractor" effects in delay discounting of probability by pigeons.
    Mueller PM; Peng DN; Zentall TR
    Anim Cogn; 2023 Jun; 26(3):1073-1081. PubMed ID: 36853524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of lesions of the nucleus accumbens core on inter-temporal choice: further observations with an adjusting-delay procedure.
    da Costa Araújo S; Body S; Hampson CL; Langley RW; Deakin JF; Anderson IM; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Sep; 202(2):272-7. PubMed ID: 19463712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of GluN2B-selective antagonists on delay and probability discounting in male rats: Modulation by delay/probability presentation order.
    Yates JR; Prior NA; Chitwood MR; Day HA; Heidel JR; Hopkins SE; Muncie BT; Paradella-Bradley TA; Sestito AP; Vecchiola AN; Wells EE
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2018 Dec; 26(6):525-540. PubMed ID: 30035577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reinforcer magnitude affects delay discounting and influences effects of d-amphetamine in rats.
    Krebs CA; Reilly WJ; Anderson KG
    Behav Processes; 2016 Sep; 130():39-45. PubMed ID: 27418423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.