These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27131782)

  • 21. Sensitivity to pre- and post-reinforcer delays in self-control choice.
    Yamaguchi T; Saeki D; Ito M
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():8-12. PubMed ID: 26456039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Choice between delayed reinforcers in an adjusting-delay schedule: the effects of absolute reinforcer size and deprivation level.
    Wogar MA; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1992 Jul; 45(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 1496135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exclusive preference develops less readily on concurrent ratio schedules with wheel-running than with sucrose reinforcement.
    Belke TW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Sep; 94(2):135-58. PubMed ID: 21451744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of quinolinic acid-induced lesions of the nucleus accumbens core on performance on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement: implications for inter-temporal choice.
    Bezzina G; Body S; Cheung TH; Hampson CL; Deakin JF; Anderson IM; Szabadi E; Bradshaw CM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2008 Apr; 197(2):339-50. PubMed ID: 18167622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
    Beeby E; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of reinforcer quality and step size on rats' performance under progressive ratio schedules.
    Covarrubias P; Aparicio CF
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 18346855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A progressive-duration schedule of reinforcement.
    Gulotta KB; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():93-7. PubMed ID: 26536304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Inter-response-time reinforcement and relative reinforcer frequency control choice.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A
    Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 25515591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performance on a progressive-ratio schedule of food reinforcement during concurrent access to a sucrose solution or tap water.
    Derenne A
    Behav Processes; 2020 Apr; 173():104040. PubMed ID: 31987848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pigeons' discounting of probabilistic and delayed reinforcers.
    Green L; Myerson J; Calvert AL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Sep; 94(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 21451742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Unit price as a useful metric in analyzing effects of reinforcer magnitude.
    DeGrandpre RJ; Bickel WK; Hughes JR; Layng MP; Badger G
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Nov; 60(3):641-66. PubMed ID: 8283154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pigeons' demand and preference for specific and generalized conditioned reinforcers in a token economy.
    Tan L; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Nov; 104(3):296-314. PubMed ID: 26676183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Delay discounting of qualitatively different reinforcers in rats.
    Calvert AL; Green L; Myerson J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Mar; 93(2):171-84. PubMed ID: 20885809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Basolateral amygdala lesions and sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude in concurrent chains schedules.
    Helms CM; Mitchell SH
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 191(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 18455812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relative reinforcer magnitude under a nonindependent concurrent schedule of cocaine reinforcement in rhesus monkeys.
    Llewellyn ME; Iglauer C; Woods JH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1976 Jan; 25(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 814191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Concurrent performances: reinforcement by different doses of intravenous cocaine in rhesus monkeys.
    Iglauer C; Woods JH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jul; 22(1):179-96. PubMed ID: 4455758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sensitivity, changeover responses, and choice in transition.
    Jiménez AA; Aparicio CF
    Behav Processes; 2009 Sep; 82(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19615608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Choice between different concentrations of sucrose in an adjusting-magnitude schedule: Evidence for reinforcer-specific value maxima.
    Bradshaw CM
    Behav Processes; 2020 Dec; 181():104275. PubMed ID: 33075441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Preference reversal between impulsive and self-control choice.
    Beeby E; White KG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 May; 99(3):260-76. PubMed ID: 23440893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Preference pulses and the win-stay, fix-and-sample model of choice.
    Hachiga Y; Sakagami T; Silberberg A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Nov; 104(3):274-95. PubMed ID: 26420769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.