166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27132034)
1. A new model to predict remission status in AML patients based on day 14 bone marrow biopsy.
Norkin M; Chang M; An Q; Leather H; Katragadda L; Li Y; Moreb JS; May WS; Brown RA; Hsu JW; Hiemenz JW; Wingard JR; Cogle CR
Leuk Res; 2016 Jul; 46():69-73. PubMed ID: 27132034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Day 14 Bone Marrow Evaluation During Acute Myeloid Leukemia Induction in a Real-world Canadian Cohort.
England JT; Saini L; Hogge D; Forrest D; Narayanan S; Power M; Nevill T; Kuchenbauer F; Hudoba M; Szkotak A; Brandwein J; Sanford D
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk; 2020 Jul; 20(7):e427-e436. PubMed ID: 32201130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Day 14 Bone Marrow Biopsy on Re-Induction Decisions and Prediction of a Complete Response in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cases.
Alsaleh K; Aleem A; Almomen A; Anjum F; S Alotaibi G
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(2):421-425. PubMed ID: 29479992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Day 14 bone marrow biopsy in predicting complete remission and survival in acute myeloid leukemia.
Hussein K; Jahagirdar B; Gupta P; Burns L; Larsen K; Weisdorf D
Am J Hematol; 2008 Jun; 83(6):446-50. PubMed ID: 18247382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marrow Hypocellularity, But Not Residual Blast Count or Receipt of Reinduction Chemotherapy, Is Prognostic on Day-14 Assessment in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients With Morphologic Residual Disease.
Ollila TA; Olszewski AJ; Butera JN; Quesenberry MI; Quesenberry PJ; Reagan JL
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk; 2018 Mar; 18(3):204-209. PubMed ID: 29433979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Routine interim disease assessment in patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia: Can we do better?
Campuzano-Zuluaga G; Deutsch Y; Salzberg M; Gomez A; Vargas F; Elias R; Kwon D; Goodman M; Ikpatt OF; Chapman JR; Watts J; Vega F; Swords R
Am J Hematol; 2016 Mar; 91(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 26663264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic significance of day 14 bone marrow evaluation in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Short NJ; Kantarjian HM; Sasaki K; Cortes JE; Ravandi F; Thomas DA; Garcia-Manero G; Khouri I; Kebriaei P; Champlin RE; Pierce S; Issa GC; Konopleva M; Kadia TM; Bueso-Ramos C; Khoury JD; Jain N; O'Brien SM; Jabbour E
Cancer; 2016 Dec; 122(24):3812-3820. PubMed ID: 27508525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictors for requiring re-induction chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia patients with residual disease on day 14 bone marrow assessment.
Nachar VR; Perissinotti AJ; Scappaticci GB; Bixby DL; Marini BL
Leuk Res; 2017 Dec; 63():56-61. PubMed ID: 29102597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relation of clinical response and minimal residual disease and their prognostic impact on outcome in acute myeloid leukemia.
Chen X; Xie H; Wood BL; Walter RB; Pagel JM; Becker PS; Sandhu VK; Abkowitz JL; Appelbaum FR; Estey EH
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(11):1258-64. PubMed ID: 25732155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is the D14 bone marrow in acute myeloid leukemia still the gold standard?
Ofran Y
Curr Opin Hematol; 2016 Mar; 23(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 26717195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic and Therapeutic Value of Day 14 Bone Marrow Aspiration in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients.
El Gammal MM; Owaidat HM; Rashed RA; Fatah RA; Samra MA
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk; 2019 Jul; 19(7):e406-e413. PubMed ID: 31031147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone marrow T-cell percentage: A novel prognostic indicator in acute myeloid leukemia.
Ismail MM; Abdulateef NAB
Int J Hematol; 2017 Apr; 105(4):453-464. PubMed ID: 27910003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone marrow biopsy in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: morphological characteristics and contribution to the study of prognostic factors.
Thomas X; Le QH; Danaïla C; Lhéritier V; Ffrench M
Leuk Res; 2002 Oct; 26(10):909-18. PubMed ID: 12163052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Re-induction therapy decisions based on day 14 bone marrow biopsy in acute myeloid leukemia.
Morris TA; DeCastro CM; Diehl LF; Gockerman JP; Lagoo AS; Li Z; Moore JO; Rizzieri DA; Rao AV
Leuk Res; 2013 Jan; 37(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 23046833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone marrow cellularity at day 14 is the most important predictive factor for response in patients with AML who require double-induction chemotherapy: Analysis from a large, single institution experience.
Griffin PT; Komrokji RS; Sweet K; Al Ali NH; Padron E; Kubal TE; List AF; Lancet JE
Am J Hematol; 2017 Mar; 92(3):232-237. PubMed ID: 28006850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dysmegakaryopoiesis predicting response to therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia. A histologic and clinical study.
Delacrétaz F; Spertini O; Schmidt PM; Grob JP
Pathol Res Pract; 1991 Mar; 187(2-3):290-5. PubMed ID: 2068013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early response to induction therapy as a predictor of disease-free survival and late recurrence of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Childrens Cancer Study Group.
Miller DR; Coccia PF; Bleyer WA; Lukens JN; Siegel SE; Sather HN; Hammond GD
J Clin Oncol; 1989 Dec; 7(12):1807-15. PubMed ID: 2685179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prediction model for complete remission upon reinduction for patients with acute myeloid leukemia after failure of anthracycline and cytarabine standard chemotherapy.
Kim DY; Lee JH; Sym SJ; Yun SC; Lee JH; Kim SD; Choi Y; Lee YS; Kang YA; Jeon M; Seol M; Lee KH; Lee YJ; Lee KH
Ann Hematol; 2011 Nov; 90(11):1283-91. PubMed ID: 21484304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Day-6 bone marrow aspirate for the prediction of response to remission induction therapy for acute myelogenous leukaemia.
Peters WG; Willemze R; Zwaan FE; Colly LP
Blut; 1988 Aug; 57(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 3165680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective comparison of early bone marrow evaluation on day 5 versus day 14 of the "3 + 7" induction regimen for acute myeloid leukemia.
Ofran Y; Leiba R; Ganzel C; Saban R; Gatt M; Ram R; Arad A; Bulvik S; Hellmann I; Gino-Moor S; Zuckerman T; Hoffman R; Horowitz N; Lavi N; Ringelstein S; Henig I; Hayun M; Rowe JM
Am J Hematol; 2015 Dec; 90(12):1159-64. PubMed ID: 26435038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
