287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27132105)
21. Efficient removal of spores from skim milk using cold microfiltration: Spore size and surface property considerations.
Griep ER; Cheng Y; Moraru CI
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Nov; 101(11):9703-9713. PubMed ID: 30146287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Production and storage stability of concentrated micellar casein.
Hammam ARA; Beckman SL; Metzger LE
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Feb; 105(2):1084-1098. PubMed ID: 34955256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Microfiltration: Effect of channel diameter on limiting flux and serum protein removal.
Hurt EE; Adams MC; Barbano DM
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jun; 98(6):3599-612. PubMed ID: 25892692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development and optimization of a carbon dioxide-aided cold microfiltration process for the physical removal of microorganisms and somatic cells from skim milk.
Fritsch J; Moraru CI
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Oct; 91(10):3744-60. PubMed ID: 18832196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Use of cold microfiltration retentates produced with polymeric membranes for standardization of milks for manufacture of pizza cheese.
Govindasamy-Lucey S; Jaeggi JJ; Johnson ME; Wang T; Lucey JA
J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4552-68. PubMed ID: 17881676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A physicochemical investigation of membrane fouling in cold microfiltration of skim milk.
Tan TJ; Wang D; Moraru CI
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(8):4759-71. PubMed ID: 24881794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Separation of milk fat globules via microfiltration: Effect of diafiltration media and opportunities for stream valorization.
Jukkola A; Partanen R; Rojas OJ; Heino A
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Nov; 99(11):8644-8654. PubMed ID: 27638266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Minor acidification of diafiltration water using various acidification agents affects the composition and rennet coagulation properties of the resulting microfiltration casein concentrate.
Gaber SM; Johansen AG; Devold TG; Rukke EO; Skeie SB
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Sep; 103(9):7927-7938. PubMed ID: 32684480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Factors that influence the membrane area of a multistage microfiltration process required to produce a micellar casein concentrate.
Hurt EE; Barbano DM
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Apr; 98(4):2222-33. PubMed ID: 25682140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Preparation of milk protein concentrates by ultrafiltration and continuous diafiltration: Effect of process design on overall efficiency.
Gavazzi-April C; Benoit S; Doyen A; Britten M; Pouliot Y
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Nov; 101(11):9670-9679. PubMed ID: 30172402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Pilot-scale crossflow-microfiltration and pasteurization to remove spores of Bacillus anthracis (Sterne) from milk.
Tomasula PM; Mukhopadhyay S; Datta N; Porto-Fett A; Call JE; Luchansky JB; Renye J; Tunick M
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4277-91. PubMed ID: 21854901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of low concentration factor microfiltration on milk component recovery and Cheddar cheese yield.
Neocleous M; Barbano DM; Rudan MA
J Dairy Sci; 2002 Oct; 85(10):2415-24. PubMed ID: 12416793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of skim milk treated with high hydrostatic pressure on permeate flux and fouling during ultrafiltration.
Leu M; Marciniak A; Chamberland J; Pouliot Y; Bazinet L; Doyen A
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Sep; 100(9):7071-7082. PubMed ID: 28647330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Vatless manufacturing of low-moisture part-skim mozzarella cheese from highly concentrated skim milk microfiltration retentates.
Ardisson-Korat AV; Rizvi SS
J Dairy Sci; 2004 Nov; 87(11):3601-13. PubMed ID: 15483143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of depleting ionic strength on
Boiani M; McLoughlin P; Auty MAE; FitzGerald RJ; Kelly PM
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Sep; 100(9):6949-6961. PubMed ID: 28690057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Shelf life and quality of skim milk processed by cold microfiltration with a 1.4-μm pore size membrane, with or without heat treatment.
Wang D; Fritsch J; Moraru CI
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Oct; 102(10):8798-8806. PubMed ID: 31326174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Membrane fractionation processes for removing 90% to 95% of the lactose and sodium from skim milk and for preparing lactose and sodium-reduced skim milk.
Morr CV; Brandon SC
J Food Sci; 2008 Nov; 73(9):C639-47. PubMed ID: 19021794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Concentration of Immunoglobulins in Microfiltration Permeates of Skim Milk: Impact of Transmembrane Pressure and Temperature on the IgG Transmission Using Different Ceramic Membrane Types and Pore Sizes.
Heidebrecht HJ; Toro-Sierra J; Kulozik U
Foods; 2018 Jun; 7(7):. PubMed ID: 29958476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of micellar casein concentrate purity and milk fat on sulfur/eggy flavor in ultrapasteurized milk-based beverages.
Whitt DM; Pranata J; Carter BG; Barbano DM; Drake MA
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jul; 105(7):5700-5713. PubMed ID: 35525620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of partial whey protein depletion during membrane filtration on thermal stability of milk concentrates.
Renhe IRT; Corredig M
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):8757-8766. PubMed ID: 30100497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
