These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27132413)
61. [Correlation of subjective and objective assessment of vaginal prolapse surgery - secondary analysis of randomized controlled study in patients with pelvic floor injury treated with vaginal mesh or with sacrospinous ligament fixation]. Švabík K; El Haddad R; Mašata J; Hubka P; Martan A Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):351-4. PubMed ID: 26606120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. [Laparoscopic Y-shaped polypropylene mesh for uterine and vaginal vault prolapse]. Li M; Feng Y; Jin S; Yu D Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 27(9):1106-9. PubMed ID: 24279025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Vaginal hysterectomy with apical fixation and anterior vaginal wall repair for prolapse: surgical technique and medium-term results. Marschke J; Pax CM; Beilecke K; Schwab F; Tunn R Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1187-1192. PubMed ID: 29574485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Sacrospinous colpopexy in the management of uterovaginal prolapse. Hoffman MS; Harris MS; Bouis PJ J Reprod Med; 1996 May; 41(5):299-303. PubMed ID: 8725751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Conservation of the prolapsed uterus is a valid option: medium term results of a prospective comparative study with the posterior intravaginal slingoplasty operation. Neuman M; Lavy Y Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2007 Aug; 18(8):889-93. PubMed ID: 17136484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Baines G; Price N; Jefferis H; Cartwright R; Jackson SR Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 31041499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. [Uterus preserving surgery versus vaginal hysterectomy in treatment of uterine descent: a systematic review]. Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Vierhout ME; van Eijndhoven HW Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2011; 155(42):A3623. PubMed ID: 22027462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. [Vaginal reconstruction for the remedy of pelvic organ prolapse: the effect, influence on urinary and sexual function and quality of life in two-years follow-upPart I. Vaginal status and complications]. Čadková I; Huvar I Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(6):430-435. PubMed ID: 29302975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Anatomic and functional assessment and risk factors of recurrent prolapse after vaginal sacrospinous fixation. Nieminen K; Huhtala H; Heinonen PK Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 May; 82(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 12752079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. [Sacrospinous ligament vaginal vault fixation--method, results and a one-year follow up in 10 patients]. Malinowski A; Pawłowski T; Maciołek-Blewniewska G; Augustyniak T Ginekol Pol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):713-9. PubMed ID: 15600295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Long-term outcome of vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for marked uterovaginal and vault prolapse. Hefni MA; El-Toukhy TA Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):257-63. PubMed ID: 16377061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Feasibility of prophylactic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy. Antosh DD; High R; Brown HW; Oliphant SS; Abed H; Philip N; Grimes CL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):605.e1-605.e5. PubMed ID: 28734829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Treating anterior vaginal wall prolapse with polypropylene mesh via the transoburator route minimizing the complications with the use of preventing measures. A prospective study with 2-year follow-up. Adamakis I; Katafigiotis I; Tyritzis SI; Mygdalis V; Sfoungaristos S; Katafigioti A; Mitropoulos D; Constantinides CA Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Jun; 67(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 25668420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study. Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Short-term outcome analysis of total pelvic reconstruction with mesh: the vaginal approach. Shah DK; Paul EM; Rastinehad AR; Eisenberg ER; Badlani GH J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):261-3. PubMed ID: 14665889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Risk of mesh extrusion and other mesh-related complications after laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with or without concurrent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: experience of 402 patients. Stepanian AA; Miklos JR; Moore RD; Mattox TF J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 18312989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Transvaginal Versus Transabdominal Placement of Synthetic Mesh at Time of Sacrocolpopexy. Nosti PA; Carter CM; Sokol AI; Tefera E; Iglesia CB; Park AJ; Gutman RE Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 26571429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]