440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27132685)
21. Democratizing data-independent acquisition proteomics analysis on public cloud infrastructures via the Galaxy framework.
Fahrner M; Föll MC; Grüning BA; Bernt M; Röst H; Schilling O
Gigascience; 2022 Feb; 11():. PubMed ID: 35166338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. SAINT: probabilistic scoring of affinity purification-mass spectrometry data.
Choi H; Larsen B; Lin ZY; Breitkreutz A; Mellacheruvu D; Fermin D; Qin ZS; Tyers M; Gingras AC; Nesvizhskii AI
Nat Methods; 2011 Jan; 8(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 21131968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Removing the Hidden Data Dependency of DIA with Predicted Spectral Libraries.
Van Puyvelde B; Willems S; Gabriels R; Daled S; De Clerck L; Vande Casteele S; Staes A; Impens F; Deforce D; Martens L; Degroeve S; Dhaenens M
Proteomics; 2020 Feb; 20(3-4):e1900306. PubMed ID: 31981311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Resolving protein interactions and complexes by affinity purification followed by label-based quantitative mass spectrometry.
Trinkle-Mulcahy L
Proteomics; 2012 May; 12(10):1623-38. PubMed ID: 22610586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. ROCS: a reproducibility index and confidence score for interaction proteomics studies.
Dazard JE; Saha S; Ewing RM
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 13():128. PubMed ID: 22682516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Processing strategies and software solutions for data-independent acquisition in mass spectrometry.
Bilbao A; Varesio E; Luban J; Strambio-De-Castillia C; Hopfgartner G; Müller M; Lisacek F
Proteomics; 2015 Mar; 15(5-6):964-80. PubMed ID: 25430050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Improvements in Mass Spectrometry Assay Library Generation for Targeted Proteomics.
Teleman J; Hauri S; Malmström J
J Proteome Res; 2017 Jul; 16(7):2384-2392. PubMed ID: 28516777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Affinity purification-mass spectrometry and network analysis to understand protein-protein interactions.
Morris JH; Knudsen GM; Verschueren E; Johnson JR; Cimermancic P; Greninger AL; Pico AR
Nat Protoc; 2014 Nov; 9(11):2539-54. PubMed ID: 25275790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Technical advances in proteomics: new developments in data-independent acquisition.
Hu A; Noble WS; Wolf-Yadlin A
F1000Res; 2016; 5():. PubMed ID: 27092249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Data Analysis Protocol for Quantitative Data-Independent Acquisition Proteomics.
Pietilä S; Suomi T; Aakko J; Elo LL
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1871():455-465. PubMed ID: 30276755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Parallel Exploration of Interaction Space by BioID and Affinity Purification Coupled to Mass Spectrometry.
Hesketh GG; Youn JY; Samavarchi-Tehrani P; Raught B; Gingras AC
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1550():115-136. PubMed ID: 28188527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. ProHits: integrated software for mass spectrometry-based interaction proteomics.
Liu G; Zhang J; Larsen B; Stark C; Breitkreutz A; Lin ZY; Breitkreutz BJ; Ding Y; Colwill K; Pasculescu A; Pawson T; Wrana JL; Nesvizhskii AI; Raught B; Tyers M; Gingras AC
Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Oct; 28(10):1015-7. PubMed ID: 20944583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Implementing the reuse of public DIA proteomics datasets: from the PRIDE database to Expression Atlas.
Walzer M; García-Seisdedos D; Prakash A; Brack P; Crowther P; Graham RL; George N; Mohammed S; Moreno P; Papatheodorou I; Hubbard SJ; Vizcaíno JA
Sci Data; 2022 Jun; 9(1):335. PubMed ID: 35701420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. New targeted approaches for the quantification of data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry.
Bruderer R; Sondermann J; Tsou CC; Barrantes-Freer A; Stadelmann C; Nesvizhskii AI; Schmidt M; Reiter L; Gomez-Varela D
Proteomics; 2017 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 28319648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Characterization of Cerebrospinal Fluid via Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry.
Barkovits K; Linden A; Galozzi S; Schilde L; Pacharra S; Mollenhauer B; Stoepel N; Steinbach S; May C; Uszkoreit J; Eisenacher M; Marcus K
J Proteome Res; 2018 Oct; 17(10):3418-3430. PubMed ID: 30207155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. From raw data to biological discoveries: a computational analysis pipeline for mass spectrometry-based proteomics.
Lavallée-Adam M; Park SK; Martínez-Bartolomé S; He L; Yates JR
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1820-6. PubMed ID: 26002791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Characterizing Protein-Protein Interactions Using Mass Spectrometry: Challenges and Opportunities.
Smits AH; Vermeulen M
Trends Biotechnol; 2016 Oct; 34(10):825-834. PubMed ID: 26996615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Data-Driven Tool for Cross-Run Ion Selection and Peak-Picking in Quantitative Proteomics with Data-Independent Acquisition LC-MS/MS.
Yan B; Shi M; Cai S; Su Y; Chen R; Huang C; Chen DDY
Anal Chem; 2023 Nov; 95(45):16558-16566. PubMed ID: 37906674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A cost-benefit analysis of multidimensional fractionation of affinity purification-mass spectrometry samples.
Dunham WH; Larsen B; Tate S; Badillo BG; Goudreault M; Tehami Y; Kislinger T; Gingras AC
Proteomics; 2011 Jul; 11(13):2603-12. PubMed ID: 21630450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Acquiring and Analyzing Data Independent Acquisition Proteomics Experiments without Spectrum Libraries.
Pino LK; Just SC; MacCoss MJ; Searle BC
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2020 Jul; 19(7):1088-1103. PubMed ID: 32312845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
