155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27133882)
21. The Johns Hopkins Hospital template for urologic cytology samples: parts II and III: improving the predictability of indeterminate results in urinary cytologic samples: an outcomes and cytomorphologic study.
VandenBussche CJ; Sathiyamoorthy S; Owens CL; Burroughs FH; Rosenthal DL; Guan H
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 23192913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative evaluation of ProEx C and ImmunoCyt/uCyt assays in atypical urine cytology.
Vergara-Lluri ME; Hu E; Rao JY; Levin M; Apple SK; Moatamed NA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Sep; 138(9):1215-22. PubMed ID: 25171704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does subdivision of the "atypical" urine cytology increase predictive accuracy for urothelial carcinoma?
Bostwick DG; Hossain D
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1034-44. PubMed ID: 24838797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The continual impact of the Paris System on urine cytology, a 3-year experience.
Stanzione N; Ahmed T; Fung PC; Cai D; Lu DY; Sumida LC; Moatamed NA
Cytopathology; 2020 Jan; 31(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 31596979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. One year of experience using the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.
Meilleroux J; Daniel G; Aziza J; d'Aure DM; Quintyn-Ranty ML; Basset CM; Evrard SM; Courtade-Saidi MM
Cancer Cytopathol; 2018 Jun; 126(6):430-436. PubMed ID: 29663682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Use of ThinPrep monolayer technique and cytospin preparation in urine cytology: a comparative analysis.
Nassar H; Ali-Fehmi R; Madan S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Mar; 28(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 12619090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. How accurate is urine cytology?
Curling M; Broome G; Hendry WF
J R Soc Med; 1986 Jun; 79(6):336-8. PubMed ID: 3723535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Patients with clinically unconfirmed positive urinary cytology --retrospective analysis of clinical courses].
Kurimura Y; Takahashi A; Hirobe M; Kunishima Y; Masumori N; Matsukawa M; Ito N; Tsukamoto T
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2007 Jul; 53(7):455-8. PubMed ID: 17702177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Urine cytology discrepancies: frequency, causes, and outcomes.
Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Vrbin CM; Geisinger KR
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jun; 127(6):946-53. PubMed ID: 17509992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An Optimized Set of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Probes for Detection of Pancreatobiliary Tract Cancer in Cytology Brush Samples.
Barr Fritcher EG; Voss JS; Brankley SM; Campion MB; Jenkins SM; Keeney ME; Henry MR; Kerr SM; Chaiteerakij R; Pestova EV; Clayton AC; Zhang J; Roberts LR; Gores GJ; Halling KC; Kipp BR
Gastroenterology; 2015 Dec; 149(7):1813-1824.e1. PubMed ID: 26327129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Overview of nongynecological samples prepared with liquid-based cytology medium.
Ren S; Solomides C; Draganova-Tacheva R; Bibbo M
Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(6):522-32. PubMed ID: 25115150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Atypical urothelial tissue fragments in noninstrumented voided urine specimens are associated with low but significantly higher rates of urothelial neoplasia than benign-appearing urothelial tissue fragments.
Onur I; Rosenthal DL; VandenBussche CJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Mar; 123(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 25586692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy and risk of malignancy for diagnostic categories in urine cytology at a large tertiary institution.
Chau K; Rosen L; Coutsouvelis C; Fenelus M; Brenkert R; Klein M; Stone G; Raab S; Aziz M; Cocker R
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Jan; 123(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 25388289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Exfoliative cytology by the Sayk sediment chamber method].
Gorski J
Z Urol Nephrol; 1981 Mar; 74(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 7223101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cell clusters in urinary cytology.
Wolfson WL; Rosenthal DL
Acta Cytol; 1978; 22(3):138-41. PubMed ID: 277038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ureterorenoscopic biopsy and urinary cytology according to the 2004 WHO classification underestimate tumor grading in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.
Straub J; Strittmatter F; Karl A; Stief CG; Tritschler S
Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1166-70. PubMed ID: 22300757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Value of urine cytology in screening patients with prostatitis syndromes.
de la Rosette JJ; Hubregtse MR; Wiersma AM; Debruyne FM
Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(5):710-2. PubMed ID: 8362583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay detects transitional cell carcinoma in the majority of patients with bladder cancer and atypical or negative urine cytology.
Skacel M; Fahmy M; Brainard JA; Pettay JD; Biscotti CV; Liou LS; Procop GW; Jones JS; Ulchaker J; Zippe CD; Tubbs RR
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2101-5. PubMed ID: 12771727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of ThinPrep UroCyte and cytospin slide preparations for gastrointestinal specimens: evaluation and retrospective performance review.
Smith GD; Chadwick BE; Adler DG; Bentz JS
Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Dec; 38(12):902-12. PubMed ID: 21104738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Collection fluid helps preservation in voided urine cytology.
Raistrick J; Shambayati B; Dunsmuir W
Cytopathology; 2008 Apr; 19(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 18352862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
