These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27134902)

  • 1. Which is More Accurate in Measuring the Blood Pressure? A Digital or an Aneroid Sphygmomanometer.
    Shahbabu B; Dasgupta A; Sarkar K; Sahoo SK
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Mar; 10(3):LC11-4. PubMed ID: 27134902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are aneroid sphygmomanometers accurate in hospital and clinic settings?
    Canzanello VJ; Jensen PL; Schwartz GL
    Arch Intern Med; 2001 Mar; 161(5):729-31. PubMed ID: 11231706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the accuracy of an aneroid sphygmomanometer in a clinical trial setting.
    Ma Y; Temprosa M; Fowler S; Prineas RJ; Montez MG; Brown-Friday J; Carrion-Petersen ML; Whittington T;
    Am J Hypertens; 2009 Mar; 22(3):263-6. PubMed ID: 19057514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical validation of aneroid sphygmomanometer.
    Saxena Y; Saxena V; Gupta R
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2012; 56(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23734440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between blood pressure readings using a mercury versus an aneroid sphygmomanometer.
    Farhan K; Naqvi STS; Rizvi SAH; Zafar A; Rawala MS
    Blood Press Monit; 2020 Feb; 25(1):34-38. PubMed ID: 31764009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of Missouri aneroid sphygmomanometer to measure blood pressure in patients with cancer.
    Ferreira KA; Santos AC; Arthur TC; Santos DA; Pereira D; Freitas EO; Fukuda FM; Baia WR
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 95(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 20658091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Type and accuracy of sphygmomanometers in primary care: a cross-sectional observational study.
    A'Court C; Stevens R; Sanders S; Ward A; McManus R; Heneghan C
    Br J Gen Pract; 2011 Sep; 61(590):e598-603. PubMed ID: 22152749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hidden errors of aneroid sphygmomanometers.
    Waugh JJ; Gupta M; Rushbrook J; Halligan A; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2002 Dec; 7(6):309-12. PubMed ID: 12488650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of correlation between digital vs. mercury sphygmomanometer in a middle-income country: The role of socio-economic situation.
    Khosravi A; Behjati M; Mansouri A; Jozan M; Mohammadifard N; Taheri M; Khodarahmi S; Ansari R; Mansouri MH; Mansouri P; Sarrafzadegan N
    Clin Exp Hypertens; 2022 Feb; 44(2):113-118. PubMed ID: 34923883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Mean blood pressure among the adults in China 2010-2012: based on the results of mercury sphygmomanometer and converted electronic sphygmomanometer].
    Yu DM; Fu P; Yu WT; Guo HJ; Yang XG; Zhao WH; Zhao LY
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 51(10):933-938. PubMed ID: 29036997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two home blood pressure monitors with a mercury sphygmomanometer in an ambulatory population.
    Johnson KA; Partsch DJ; Gleason P; Makay K
    Pharmacotherapy; 1999 Mar; 19(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 10221371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can aneroid sphygmomanometers be used at altitude?
    Kametas NA; McAuliffe F; Krampl E; Nicolaides KH; Shennan AH
    J Hum Hypertens; 2006 Jul; 20(7):517-22. PubMed ID: 16617312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings.
    Pavlik VN; Hyman DJ; Toronjo C
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2000 Mar; 2(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 11416630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of mercury and aneroid blood pressure measurements in youth.
    Shah AS; Dolan LM; D'Agostino RB; Standiford D; Davis C; Testaverde L; Pihoker C; Daniels SR; Urbina EM;
    Pediatrics; 2012 May; 129(5):e1205-10. PubMed ID: 22508914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auscl-D: a mercury-free digital auscultatory sphygmomanometer.
    Kumar V; Kumar R; Kumar M; Wander GS; Sahani A
    J Med Eng Technol; 2021 Nov; 45(8):656-663. PubMed ID: 34254871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The accuracy of aneroid sphygmomanometers in the ambulatory setting.
    Moore TA; Sorokin AV; Hirst C; Thornton-Thompson S; Thompson PD
    Prev Cardiol; 2008; 11(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 18401236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of sphygmomanometers used by family physicians practicing outside the hospital environment in Bas-Saint-Laurent].
    Vanasse A; Courteau J
    Can Fam Physician; 2001 Feb; 47():281-6. PubMed ID: 11228028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of aneroid sphygmomanometer blood pressure recording compared with digital and mercury measurements in Brazil.
    Gill G; Ala L; Gurgel R; Cuevas L
    Trop Doct; 2004 Jan; 34(1):26-7. PubMed ID: 14959969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of Heine Gamma G7 (G5) and XXL-LF aneroid devices for blood pressure measurement.
    Dorigatti F; Bonso E; Zanier A; Palatini P
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 17303985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.