156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27135539)
1. p53 Pulses Diversify Target Gene Expression Dynamics in an mRNA Half-Life-Dependent Manner and Delineate Co-regulated Target Gene Subnetworks.
Porter JR; Fisher BE; Batchelor E
Cell Syst; 2016 Apr; 2(4):272-82. PubMed ID: 27135539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protein stability of p53 targets determines their temporal expression dynamics in response to p53 pulsing.
Hanson RL; Porter JR; Batchelor E
J Cell Biol; 2019 Apr; 218(4):1282-1297. PubMed ID: 30745421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mathematical modelling of p53 basal dynamics and DNA damage response.
Chong KH; Samarasinghe S; Kulasiri D
Math Biosci; 2015 Jan; 259():27-42. PubMed ID: 25433195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stimulus-dependent dynamics of p53 in single cells.
Batchelor E; Loewer A; Mock C; Lahav G
Mol Syst Biol; 2011 May; 7():488. PubMed ID: 21556066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Hill type equation can predict target gene expression driven by p53 pulsing.
Shi X
FEBS Open Bio; 2021 Jun; 11(6):1799-1808. PubMed ID: 33955710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of p53 in the progression from ochratoxin A-induced DNA damage to gene mutations in the kidneys of mice.
Kuroda K; Hibi D; Ishii Y; Yokoo Y; Takasu S; Kijima A; Matsushita K; Masumura K; Kodama Y; Yanai T; Sakai H; Nohmi T; Ogawa K; Umemura T
Toxicol Sci; 2015 Mar; 144(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 25636497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. p53 pulses lead to distinct patterns of gene expression albeit similar DNA-binding dynamics.
Hafner A; Stewart-Ornstein J; Purvis JE; Forrester WC; Bulyk ML; Lahav G
Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2017 Oct; 24(10):840-847. PubMed ID: 28825732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The mechanism accounting for DNA damage strength modulation of p53 dynamical properties.
Ma A; Dai X
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2023 Jun; 21(3):2350011. PubMed ID: 37325863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DNA microarrays identification of primary and secondary target genes regulated by p53.
Kannan K; Amariglio N; Rechavi G; Jakob-Hirsch J; Kela I; Kaminski N; Getz G; Domany E; Givol D
Oncogene; 2001 Apr; 20(18):2225-34. PubMed ID: 11402317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Persistent STAT5-mediated ROS production and involvement of aberrant p53 apoptotic signaling in the resistance of chronic myeloid leukemia to imatinib.
Cheng Y; Hao Y; Zhang A; Hu C; Jiang X; Wu Q; Xu X
Int J Mol Med; 2018 Jan; 41(1):455-463. PubMed ID: 29115375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The mycotoxin Zearalenone induces apoptosis in human hepatocytes (HepG2) via p53-dependent mitochondrial signaling pathway.
Ayed-Boussema I; Bouaziz C; Rjiba K; Valenti K; Laporte F; Bacha H; Hassen W
Toxicol In Vitro; 2008 Oct; 22(7):1671-80. PubMed ID: 18662769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The catalytic topoisomerase II inhibitor dexrazoxane induces DNA breaks, ATF3 and the DNA damage response in cancer cells.
Deng S; Yan T; Nikolova T; Fuhrmann D; Nemecek A; Gödtel-Armbrust U; Kaina B; Wojnowski L
Br J Pharmacol; 2015 May; 172(9):2246-57. PubMed ID: 25521189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Regulation of H-ras splice variant expression by cross talk between the p53 and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay pathways.
Barbier J; Dutertre M; Bittencourt D; Sanchez G; Gratadou L; de la Grange P; Auboeuf D
Mol Cell Biol; 2007 Oct; 27(20):7315-33. PubMed ID: 17709397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. p53 dynamics in response to DNA damage vary across cell lines and are shaped by efficiency of DNA repair and activity of the kinase ATM.
Stewart-Ornstein J; Lahav G
Sci Signal; 2017 Apr; 10(476):. PubMed ID: 28442631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. p53 is involved in shrimp survival via its regulation roles on MnSOD and GPx in response to acute environmental stresses.
Qian Z; Liu T; Liu Q; He S; Liu Y; Hou F; Wang X; Mi X; Cai C; Liu X
Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Jan; 159():38-51. PubMed ID: 24120750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. p53 dynamics orchestrates with binding affinity to target genes for cell fate decision.
Wu M; Ye H; Tang Z; Shao C; Lu G; Chen B; Yang Y; Wang G; Hao H
Cell Death Dis; 2017 Oct; 8(10):e3130. PubMed ID: 29048401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. p53-dependent and -independent regulation of the death receptor KILLER/DR5 gene expression in response to genotoxic stress and tumor necrosis factor alpha.
Sheikh MS; Burns TF; Huang Y; Wu GS; Amundson S; Brooks KS; Fornace AJ; el-Deiry WS
Cancer Res; 1998 Apr; 58(8):1593-8. PubMed ID: 9563466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ChIP (chromatin immunoprecipitation) analysis demonstrates co-ordinated binding of two transcription factors to the promoter of the p53 tumour-suppressor gene.
Polson A; Takahashi P; Reisman D
Cell Biol Int; 2010 Sep; 34(9):883-91. PubMed ID: 20446924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The p53-dependent gamma-ray response of GADD45.
Zhan Q; Bae I; Kastan MB; Fornace AJ
Cancer Res; 1994 May; 54(10):2755-60. PubMed ID: 8168107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differential regulation of the p21/WAF-1 and mdm2 genes after high-dose UV irradiation: p53-dependent and p53-independent regulation of the mdm2 gene.
Wu L; Levine AJ
Mol Med; 1997 Jul; 3(7):441-51. PubMed ID: 9260156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
