383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27135633)
1. A haplotype method detects diverse scenarios of local adaptation from genomic sequence variation.
Lange JD; Pool JE
Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3081-100. PubMed ID: 27135633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recent selective sweeps in North American Drosophila melanogaster show signatures of soft sweeps.
Garud NR; Messer PW; Buzbas EO; Petrov DA
PLoS Genet; 2015 Feb; 11(2):e1005004. PubMed ID: 25706129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple Modes of Positive Selection Shaping the Patterns of Incomplete Selective Sweeps over African Populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
Vy HMT; Won YJ; Kim Y
Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Nov; 34(11):2792-2807. PubMed ID: 28981697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maximum SNP FST Outperforms Full-Window Statistics for Detecting Soft Sweeps in Local Adaptation.
da Silva Ribeiro T; Galván JA; Pool JE
Genome Biol Evol; 2022 Oct; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 36152314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of hard and soft selective sweeps from Drosophila melanogaster population genomic data.
Garud NR; Messer PW; Petrov DA
PLoS Genet; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e1009373. PubMed ID: 33635910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhancing the mathematical properties of new haplotype homozygosity statistics for the detection of selective sweeps.
Garud NR; Rosenberg NA
Theor Popul Biol; 2015 Jun; 102():94-101. PubMed ID: 25891325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On detecting incomplete soft or hard selective sweeps using haplotype structure.
Ferrer-Admetlla A; Liang M; Korneliussen T; Nielsen R
Mol Biol Evol; 2014 May; 31(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 24554778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Composite-Likelihood Method for Detecting Incomplete Selective Sweep from Population Genomic Data.
Vy HM; Kim Y
Genetics; 2015 Jun; 200(2):633-49. PubMed ID: 25911658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Signatures of soft sweeps across the Dt1 locus underlying determinate growth habit in soya bean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.].
Zhong L; Yang Q; Yan X; Yu C; Su L; Zhang X; Zhu Y
Mol Ecol; 2017 Sep; 26(18):4686-4699. PubMed ID: 28627128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inferring the age of a fixed beneficial allele.
Ormond L; Foll M; Ewing GB; Pfeifer SP; Jensen JD
Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(1):157-69. PubMed ID: 26576754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection and Classification of Hard and Soft Sweeps from Unphased Genotypes by Multilocus Genotype Identity.
Harris AM; Garud NR; DeGiorgio M
Genetics; 2018 Dec; 210(4):1429-1452. PubMed ID: 30315068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of selective sweeps in structured populations: a comparison of recent methods.
Vatsiou AI; Bazin E; Gaggiotti OE
Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 26314386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevalence of negative frequency-dependent selection, revealed by incomplete selective sweeps in African populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
Kim Y
BMB Rep; 2018 Jan; 51(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 29187282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Soft shoulders ahead: spurious signatures of soft and partial selective sweeps result from linked hard sweeps.
Schrider DR; Mendes FK; Hahn MW; Kern AD
Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 25716978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the unfounded enthusiasm for soft selective sweeps II: Examining recent evidence from humans, flies, and viruses.
Harris RB; Sackman A; Jensen JD
PLoS Genet; 2018 Dec; 14(12):e1007859. PubMed ID: 30592709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effects on Neutral Variability of Recurrent Selective Sweeps and Background Selection.
Campos JL; Charlesworth B
Genetics; 2019 May; 212(1):287-303. PubMed ID: 30923166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Likelihood Approach for Uncovering Selective Sweep Signatures from Haplotype Data.
Harris AM; DeGiorgio M
Mol Biol Evol; 2020 Oct; 37(10):3023-3046. PubMed ID: 32392293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Signatures of positive selection: from selective sweeps at individual loci to subtle allele frequency changes in polygenic adaptation.
Stephan W
Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 26108992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Soft Sweeps Are the Dominant Mode of Adaptation in the Human Genome.
Schrider DR; Kern AD
Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Aug; 34(8):1863-1877. PubMed ID: 28482049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adaptation in structured populations and fuzzy boundaries between hard and soft sweeps.
Zheng Y; Wiehe T
PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Nov; 15(11):e1007426. PubMed ID: 31710623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]