BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27135633)

  • 1. A haplotype method detects diverse scenarios of local adaptation from genomic sequence variation.
    Lange JD; Pool JE
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3081-100. PubMed ID: 27135633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recent selective sweeps in North American Drosophila melanogaster show signatures of soft sweeps.
    Garud NR; Messer PW; Buzbas EO; Petrov DA
    PLoS Genet; 2015 Feb; 11(2):e1005004. PubMed ID: 25706129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple Modes of Positive Selection Shaping the Patterns of Incomplete Selective Sweeps over African Populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Vy HMT; Won YJ; Kim Y
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Nov; 34(11):2792-2807. PubMed ID: 28981697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximum SNP FST Outperforms Full-Window Statistics for Detecting Soft Sweeps in Local Adaptation.
    da Silva Ribeiro T; Galván JA; Pool JE
    Genome Biol Evol; 2022 Oct; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 36152314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of hard and soft selective sweeps from Drosophila melanogaster population genomic data.
    Garud NR; Messer PW; Petrov DA
    PLoS Genet; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e1009373. PubMed ID: 33635910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancing the mathematical properties of new haplotype homozygosity statistics for the detection of selective sweeps.
    Garud NR; Rosenberg NA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2015 Jun; 102():94-101. PubMed ID: 25891325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On detecting incomplete soft or hard selective sweeps using haplotype structure.
    Ferrer-Admetlla A; Liang M; Korneliussen T; Nielsen R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 May; 31(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 24554778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Composite-Likelihood Method for Detecting Incomplete Selective Sweep from Population Genomic Data.
    Vy HM; Kim Y
    Genetics; 2015 Jun; 200(2):633-49. PubMed ID: 25911658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Signatures of soft sweeps across the Dt1 locus underlying determinate growth habit in soya bean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.].
    Zhong L; Yang Q; Yan X; Yu C; Su L; Zhang X; Zhu Y
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Sep; 26(18):4686-4699. PubMed ID: 28627128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inferring the age of a fixed beneficial allele.
    Ormond L; Foll M; Ewing GB; Pfeifer SP; Jensen JD
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(1):157-69. PubMed ID: 26576754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection and Classification of Hard and Soft Sweeps from Unphased Genotypes by Multilocus Genotype Identity.
    Harris AM; Garud NR; DeGiorgio M
    Genetics; 2018 Dec; 210(4):1429-1452. PubMed ID: 30315068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of selective sweeps in structured populations: a comparison of recent methods.
    Vatsiou AI; Bazin E; Gaggiotti OE
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 26314386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prevalence of negative frequency-dependent selection, revealed by incomplete selective sweeps in African populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Kim Y
    BMB Rep; 2018 Jan; 51(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 29187282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soft shoulders ahead: spurious signatures of soft and partial selective sweeps result from linked hard sweeps.
    Schrider DR; Mendes FK; Hahn MW; Kern AD
    Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 25716978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the unfounded enthusiasm for soft selective sweeps II: Examining recent evidence from humans, flies, and viruses.
    Harris RB; Sackman A; Jensen JD
    PLoS Genet; 2018 Dec; 14(12):e1007859. PubMed ID: 30592709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effects on Neutral Variability of Recurrent Selective Sweeps and Background Selection.
    Campos JL; Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2019 May; 212(1):287-303. PubMed ID: 30923166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Likelihood Approach for Uncovering Selective Sweep Signatures from Haplotype Data.
    Harris AM; DeGiorgio M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2020 Oct; 37(10):3023-3046. PubMed ID: 32392293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Signatures of positive selection: from selective sweeps at individual loci to subtle allele frequency changes in polygenic adaptation.
    Stephan W
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 26108992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Soft Sweeps Are the Dominant Mode of Adaptation in the Human Genome.
    Schrider DR; Kern AD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Aug; 34(8):1863-1877. PubMed ID: 28482049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptation in structured populations and fuzzy boundaries between hard and soft sweeps.
    Zheng Y; Wiehe T
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Nov; 15(11):e1007426. PubMed ID: 31710623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.