BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27135944)

  • 1. Evaluation of the Genetic Response of U937 and Jurkat Cells to 10-Nanosecond Electrical Pulses (nsEP).
    Roth CC; Glickman RD; Tolstykh GP; Estlack LE; Moen EK; Echchgadda I; Beier HT; Barnes RA; Ibey BL
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154555. PubMed ID: 27135944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adult human dermal fibroblasts exposed to nanosecond electrical pulses exhibit genetic biomarkers of mechanical stress.
    Roth CC; Glickman RD; Martens SL; Echchgadda I; Beier HT; Barnes RA; Ibey BL
    Biochem Biophys Rep; 2017 Mar; 9():302-309. PubMed ID: 28956017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gadolinium modifies the cell membrane to inhibit permeabilization by nanosecond electric pulses.
    Gianulis EC; Pakhomov AG
    Arch Biochem Biophys; 2015 Mar; 570():1-7. PubMed ID: 25707556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gadolinium blocks membrane permeabilization induced by nanosecond electric pulses and reduces cell death.
    André FM; Rassokhin MA; Bowman AM; Pakhomov AG
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2010 Aug; 79(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 20097138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of Pressure Transients Generated by Nanosecond Electrical Pulse (nsEP) Exposure.
    Roth CC; Barnes RA; Ibey BL; Beier HT; Christopher Mimun L; Maswadi SM; Shadaram M; Glickman RD
    Sci Rep; 2015 Oct; 5():15063. PubMed ID: 26450165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nanosecond pulsed electric fields modulate the expression of Fas/CD95 death receptor pathway regulators in U937 and Jurkat Cells.
    Estlack LE; Roth CC; Thompson GL; Lambert WA; Ibey BL
    Apoptosis; 2014 Dec; 19(12):1755-68. PubMed ID: 25331537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of Proteins Involved in Cell Membrane Permeabilization by Nanosecond Electric Pulses (nsEP).
    Silkuniene G; Mangalanathan UM; Rossi A; Mollica PA; Pakhomov AG; Pakhomova O
    Int J Mol Sci; 2023 May; 24(11):. PubMed ID: 37298142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nanosecond electric pulses cause mitochondrial membrane permeabilization in Jurkat cells.
    Batista Napotnik T; Wu YH; Gundersen MA; Miklavčič D; Vernier PT
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2012 Apr; 33(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 21953203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective distant electrostimulation by synchronized bipolar nanosecond pulses.
    Gianulis EC; Casciola M; Zhou C; Yang E; Xiao S; Pakhomov AG
    Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13116. PubMed ID: 31511591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cancellation of cellular responses to nanoelectroporation by reversing the stimulus polarity.
    Pakhomov AG; Semenov I; Xiao S; Pakhomova ON; Gregory B; Schoenbach KH; Ullery JC; Beier HT; Rajulapati SR; Ibey BL
    Cell Mol Life Sci; 2014 Nov; 71(22):4431-41. PubMed ID: 24748074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The cytotoxic synergy of nanosecond electric pulses and low temperature leads to apoptosis.
    Muratori C; Pakhomov AG; Gianulis EC; Jensen SD; Pakhomova ON
    Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():36835. PubMed ID: 27833151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Cooling On Cell Volume and Viability After Nanoelectroporation.
    Muratori C; Pakhomov AG; Pakhomova ON
    J Membr Biol; 2017 Apr; 250(2):217-224. PubMed ID: 28243693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple nanosecond electric pulses increase the number but not the size of long-lived nanopores in the cell membrane.
    Pakhomov AG; Gianulis E; Vernier PT; Semenov I; Xiao S; Pakhomova ON
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 Apr; 1848(4):958-66. PubMed ID: 25585279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sub-MHz bursts of nanosecond pulses excite neurons at paradoxically low electric field thresholds without membrane damage.
    Silkunas M; Gudvangen E; Novickij V; Pakhomov AG
    Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr; 2022 Nov; 1864(11):184034. PubMed ID: 35981654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nanosecond electric pulses: a mini-review of the present state of the art.
    Chopinet L; Rols MP
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2015 Jun; 103():2-6. PubMed ID: 25190180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The interplay of excitation and electroporation in nanosecond pulse stimulation.
    Pakhomov AG; Pakhomova ON
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2020 Dec; 136():107598. PubMed ID: 32711366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The interphase interval within a bipolar nanosecond electric pulse modulates bipolar cancellation.
    Valdez CM; Barnes R; Roth CC; Moen E; Ibey B
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2018 Sep; 39(6):441-450. PubMed ID: 29984850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diffuse, non-polar electropermeabilization and reduced propidium uptake distinguish the effect of nanosecond electric pulses.
    Semenov I; Zemlin C; Pakhomova ON; Xiao S; Pakhomov AG
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 Oct; 1848(10 Pt A):2118-25. PubMed ID: 26112464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nanosecond pulsed electric field induced dose dependent phosphatidylinositol-
    Tolstykh GP; Tarango M; Roth CC; Ibey BL
    Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr; 2017 Mar; 1859(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 28064021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of high voltage nanosecond electric pulses on eukaryotic cells (in vitro): A systematic review.
    Batista Napotnik T; Reberšek M; Vernier PT; Mali B; Miklavčič D
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2016 Aug; 110():1-12. PubMed ID: 26946156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.