157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27136083)
1. Disc-damage Likelihood Scale (DDLS) as a Clinical Indicator of the Presence of a Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect (RAPD).
Zhang AY; Lu L; Ali M; Rutnin N; Faria BM; Guzel H; Liang L; Martinez P; Tawfik M; Spaeth GL
J Glaucoma; 2016 Oct; 25(10):e910-e916. PubMed ID: 27136083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of asymmetric glaucomatous damage using automated pupillography, the swinging flashlight method and the magnified-assisted swinging flashlight method.
Waisbourd M; Lee B; Ali MH; Lu L; Martinez P; Faria B; Williams A; Moster MR; Katz LJ; Spaeth GL
Eye (Lond); 2015 Oct; 29(10):1321-8. PubMed ID: 26113498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of 3 techniques to detect a relative afferent pupillary defect.
Ichhpujani P; Rome JE; Jindal A; Khator P; Leiby BE; Gordon H; Chen B; Spaeth GL
J Glaucoma; 2011 Dec; 20(9):535-9. PubMed ID: 20852433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma patients with a relative afferent pupillary defect.
Chew SS; Cunnningham WJ; Gamble GD; Danesh-Meyer HV
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Oct; 51(10):5049-53. PubMed ID: 20445112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of optic nerve head topography and visual field in eyes with open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma.
Boland MV; Zhang L; Broman AT; Jampel HD; Quigley HA
Ophthalmology; 2008 Feb; 115(2):239-245.e2. PubMed ID: 18082888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regional correlation of structure and function in glaucoma, using the Disc Damage Likelihood Scale, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, and visual fields.
Danesh-Meyer HV; Ku JY; Papchenko TL; Jayasundera T; Hsiang JC; Gamble GD
Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):603-11. PubMed ID: 16483660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification of RAPD by an automated pupillometer in asymmetric glaucoma and its correlation with manual pupillary assessment.
Pillai MR; Sinha S; Aggarwal P; Ravindran RD; Privitera CM
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 67(2):227-232. PubMed ID: 30672475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The usefulness of a new method of testing for a relative afferent pupillary defect in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Lankaranian D; Altangerel U; Spaeth GL; Leavitt JA; Steinmann WC
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2005; 103():200-7; discussion 207-8. PubMed ID: 17057803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography a study on diagnostic agreement with Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph.
Leung CK; Ye C; Weinreb RN; Cheung CY; Qiu Q; Liu S; Xu G; Lam DS
Ophthalmology; 2010 Feb; 117(2):267-74. PubMed ID: 19969364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between disc damage likelihood scale and optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of glaucoma.
Abdul Majid AS; Kwag JH; Jung SH; Yim HB; Kim YD; Kang KD
Ophthalmologica; 2010; 224(5):274-82. PubMed ID: 20185941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optic disc imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: variability and agreement study with Heidelberg retinal tomograph.
Yang B; Ye C; Yu M; Liu S; Lam DS; Leung CK
Ophthalmology; 2012 Sep; 119(9):1852-7. PubMed ID: 22572035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry.
Kara-José AC; Melo LAS; Esporcatte BLB; Endo ATNH; Leite MT; Tavares IM
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181428. PubMed ID: 28727836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of Disc Damage Likelihood Scale, visual field, and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II in patients with glaucoma.
Hornova J; Kuntz Navarro JB; Prasad A; Freitas DG; Nunes CM
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008; 18(5):739-47. PubMed ID: 18850552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. More sensitive correlation of afferent pupillary defect with ganglion cell complex.
Besada E; Frauens BJ; Makhlouf R; Shechtman D; Rodman J; Demeritt M; Hardigan P
J Optom; 2018; 11(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 28676353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of focal lamina cribrosa defect on glaucomatous visual field progression.
Faridi OS; Park SC; Kabadi R; Su D; De Moraes CG; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug; 121(8):1524-30. PubMed ID: 24697910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of disc damage likelihood scale, cup to disc ratio, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in the diagnosis of glaucoma.
Danesh-Meyer HV; Gaskin BJ; Jayusundera T; Donaldson M; Gamble GD
Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 90(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 16547323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differentiation of compressive from glaucomatous optic neuropathy with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
Danesh-Meyer HV; Yap J; Frampton C; Savino PJ
Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug; 121(8):1516-23. PubMed ID: 24725827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diffuse glaucomatous structural and functional damage in the hemifield without significant pattern loss.
Grewal DS; Sehi M; Greenfield DS
Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Nov; 127(11):1442-8. PubMed ID: 19901209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Heidelberg retina tomograph ancillary study to the European glaucoma prevention study: study design and baseline factors.
Hoffmann EM; Miglior S; Zeyen T; Torri V; Rulli E; Aliyeva S; Floriani I; Cunha-Vaz J; Pfeiffer N
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 91(8):e612-9. PubMed ID: 23710686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of psychophysical and structural injury in eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy and normal standard automated perimetry.
Bagga H; Feuer WJ; Greenfield DS
Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Feb; 124(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 16476885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
