These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27137197)

  • 1. Go and NoGo: modulation of electrophysiological correlates by female sex steroid hormones.
    Griskova-Bulanova I; Griksiene R; Voicikas A; Ruksenas O
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Jul; 233(13):2607-15. PubMed ID: 27137197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex differences in equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: effects on N2 and P3.
    Melynyte S; Ruksenas O; Griskova-Bulanova I
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1565-1574. PubMed ID: 28258436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: children vs. adults.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Borchard JP
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Oct; 125(10):1995-2006. PubMed ID: 24661623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Event-related potentials to response production and inhibition in go/nogo task. I. Topographical characteristics to different visual stimulus sequences].
    Kaga Y; Iwadare Y; Noguchi S; Tando T; Aihara M
    No To Hattatsu; 2008 Jan; 40(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 18210859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of age on N2 and P3 components: A meta-analysis of Go/Nogo tasks.
    Cheng CH; Tsai HY; Cheng HN
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Oct; 135():103574. PubMed ID: 31200173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Event-related potentials for response inhibition in Parkinson's disease.
    Bokura H; Yamaguchi S; Kobayashi S
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):967-75. PubMed ID: 15716167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A processing schema for children in the auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task: ERP components and behaviour.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Fogarty JS
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jan; 123():74-79. PubMed ID: 29122654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time course of automatic emotion regulation during a facial Go/Nogo task.
    Zhang W; Lu J
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Feb; 89(2):444-9. PubMed ID: 22200654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sequential processing in young and older adults in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Cave AE
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 May; 127(5):2273-85. PubMed ID: 27072100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of age on cognitive control during semantic categorization.
    Mudar RA; Chiang HS; Maguire MJ; Spence JS; Eroh J; Kraut MA; Hart J
    Behav Brain Res; 2015; 287():285-93. PubMed ID: 25823764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a temporal PCA study.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 23792217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Verbal retrieval deficits due to traumatic brain injury are associated with changes in event related potentials during a Go-NoGo task.
    Chiang HS; Motes M; Afkhami-Rohani B; Adhikari A; LoBue C; Kraut M; Cullum CM; Hart J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2024 Jul; 163():1-13. PubMed ID: 38663098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERP Go/NoGo condition effects are better detected with separate PCAs.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Fogarty JS; Karamacoska D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Aug; 106():50-64. PubMed ID: 27289050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 23643562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological underpinnings of response variability in the Go/NoGo task.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():159-167. PubMed ID: 30266622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Different relationships between central dopamine system and sub-processes of inhibition: Spontaneous eye blink rate relates with N2 but not P3 in a Go/Nogo task.
    Zhang T; Wang C; Tan F; Mou D; Zheng L; Chen A
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Jun; 105():95-103. PubMed ID: 27115071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Executive dysfunction in medication-naïve children with ADHD: A multi-modal fNIRS and EEG study.
    Kaga Y; Ueda R; Tanaka M; Kita Y; Suzuki K; Okumura Y; Egashira Y; Shirakawa Y; Mitsuhashi S; Kitamura Y; Nakagawa E; Yamashita Y; Inagaki M
    Brain Dev; 2020 Sep; 42(8):555-563. PubMed ID: 32532641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the use of event-related potentials to auditory stimuli in the Go/NoGo task.
    Smith JL; Douglas KM
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 Sep; 193(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 21764566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.