These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2713754)

  • 1. Comparison of the Pulsair noncontact tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Climenhaga H; Plucinska H
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1989 Feb; 24(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 2713754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of a new non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.
    Moseley MJ; Evans NM; Fielder AR
    Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 3)():332-7. PubMed ID: 2612679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the performance of the Nidek NT-2000 noncontact tonometer with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Cho P; Lui T
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jan; 74(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 9148267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical comparison of Pulsair non-contact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in Indian population.
    Mohan S; Tiwari S; Jain A; Gupta J; Sachan SK
    J Optom; 2014; 7(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 24766865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Glaucoma screening in primary care: the role of noncontact tonometry.
    Ralston ME; Choplin NT; Hollenbach KA; Applegate BJ; Henn TW
    J Fam Pract; 1992 Jan; 34(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 1728657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy and reliability of the Keeler Pulsair EasyEye non-contact tonometer.
    Ogbuehi KC; Almubrad TM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 85(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 18174841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the Keeler Pulsair non-contact tonometer.
    Sponsel WE; Kaufman PL; Strinden TI; DePaul KL; Bowes HN; Olander KW; Barnebey HS
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1989 Oct; 67(5):567-72. PubMed ID: 2589057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
    Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraocular pressure asymmetry in a population tested with the Pulsair non-contact tonometer.
    Vernon SA; Jones SJ
    Eye (Lond); 1991; 5 ( Pt 6)():674-7. PubMed ID: 1800165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deterioration in the accuracy of the pulsair non-contact tonometer with use: need for regular calibration.
    Atkinson PL; Wishart PK; James JN; Vernon SA; Reid F
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 5)():530-4. PubMed ID: 1286721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The noncontact tonometer. Clinical evaluation on normal and diseased eyes.
    Sorensen PN
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1975 Sep; 53(4):513-21. PubMed ID: 1242275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of the Nidek NT-1000 non contact tonometer.
    Van de Velde T; Zeyen T
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1995; 255():19-22. PubMed ID: 7496571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000, American Optical MkII and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Mackie SW; Jay JL; Ackerley R; Walsh G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Mar; 16(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 8762780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].
    Meyer MW; Yevelenko V; Hoy L; Meyer A; Erb C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical comparison of the Proview eye pressure monitor with the Goldmann applanation tonometer and the Tonopen.
    Li J; Herndon LW; Asrani SG; Stinnett S; Allingham RR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2004 Aug; 122(8):1117-21. PubMed ID: 15302650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.
    Moseley MJ; Thompson JR; Deutsch J; Misson GP; Naylor G; Tan-Yee A; Taylor RH; Fielder AR
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():127-30. PubMed ID: 8325401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of the pressure phosphene tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
    Rietveld E; van den Bremer DA; Völker-Dieben HJ
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 89(5):537-9. PubMed ID: 15834078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children.
    Feng CS; Jin KW; Yi K; Choi DG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 160(5):937-943.e1. PubMed ID: 26210864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Pulsair-Keeler non-contact tonometer in self-tonometry: preliminary results.
    Boles Carenini B; Brogliatti B; Tonetto C; Renis E
    Int Ophthalmol; 1992 Sep; 16(4-5):295-7. PubMed ID: 1428561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].
    Schlote T; Landenberger H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.