These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27138873)

  • 21. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Sauer's binaural number test in noise. Significance in expertise].
    Braun T; Leisering B; Krause E; Schorn K; Hempel JM
    HNO; 2012 Oct; 60(10):886-91. PubMed ID: 22767194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech-in-noise tests for multilingual hearing screening and diagnostics1.
    Zokoll MA; Hochmuth S; Warzybok A; Wagener KC; Buschermöhle M; Kollmeier B
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):175-8. PubMed ID: 23800814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Phoneme and Word Scoring in Speech-in-Noise Audiometry.
    Billings CJ; Penman TM; Ellis EM; Baltzell LS; McMillan GP
    Am J Audiol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 26989823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An Australian version of the acceptable noise level test and its predictive value for successful hearing aid use in an older population.
    Walravens E; Keidser G; Hartley D; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S52-9. PubMed ID: 24447234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acceptable noise level: repeatability with Danish and non-semantic speech materials for adults with normal hearing.
    Olsen SØ; Nielsen LH; Lantz J; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):557-63. PubMed ID: 22537032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Compensated active noise cancellation earphone for audiometric screening tests in noisy environments.
    Chang HY; Luo CH; Lo TS; Tai CC
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Nov; 58(11):747-753. PubMed ID: 31215819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of speech intelligibility in noise with the Hearing in Noise Test.
    Soli SD; Wong LL
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 18569108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The development and evaluation of the Finnish digit triplet test.
    Willberg T; Buschermöhle M; Sivonen V; Aarnisalo AA; Löppönen H; Kollmeier B; Dietz A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 136(10):1035-40. PubMed ID: 27121373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Validation of a Computer-Administered Version of the Digits-in-Noise Test for Hearing Screening in the United States.
    Folmer RL; Vachhani J; McMillan GP; Watson C; Kidd GR; Feeney MP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):161-169. PubMed ID: 28240983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How we do it: The Dutch functional hearing-screening tests by telephone and internet.
    Smits C; Merkus P; Houtgast T
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Oct; 31(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 17014457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Danish reading span data from 283 hearing-aid users, including a sub-group analysis of their relationship to speech-in-noise performance.
    Borch Petersen E; Lunner T; Vestergaard MD; Sundewall Thorén E
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 26836955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Exploring the sensitivity of speech-in-noise tests for noise-induced hearing loss.
    Jansen S; Luts H; Dejonckere P; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 24237040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hearing disability measured by the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale in clinically normal-hearing and hearing-impaired middle-aged persons, and disability screening by means of a reduced SSQ (the SSQ5).
    Demeester K; Topsakal V; Hendrickx JJ; Fransen E; van Laer L; Van Camp G; Van de Heyning P; van Wieringen A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):615-6. PubMed ID: 22568994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation : Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions].
    Rader T
    HNO; 2015 Feb; 63(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 25515123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficient hearing screening in noise-exposed listeners using the digit triplet test.
    Jansen S; Luts H; Dejonckere P; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 23782715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Temporal resolution in regions of normal hearing and speech perception in noise for adults with sloping high-frequency hearing loss.
    Feng Y; Yin S; Kiefte M; Wang J
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 19816181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The applicability of a speech-in-noise screening test in occupational hearing conservation.
    Leensen MC; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):455-65. PubMed ID: 23772828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.