192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27140228)
1. The slow-pull capillary technique increases the quality of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy samples in solid pancreatic lesions.
El Haddad R; Barret M; Beuvon F; Grabar S; Leblanc S; Terris B; Coriat R; Chaussade S; Prat F
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Aug; 28(8):911-6. PubMed ID: 27140228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Slow-pull and different conventional suction techniques in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid lesions using 22-gauge needles.
Chen JY; Ding QY; Lv Y; Guo W; Zhi FC; Liu SD; Cheng TM
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(39):8790-8797. PubMed ID: 27818594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses.
Nakai Y; Isayama H; Chang KJ; Yamamoto N; Hamada T; Uchino R; Mizuno S; Miyabayashi K; Yamamoto K; Kawakubo K; Kogure H; Sasaki T; Hirano K; Tanaka M; Tada M; Fukayama M; Koike K
Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 24429514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
Di Mitri R; Mocciaro F; Antonini F; Scimeca D; Conte E; Bonaccorso A; Scibetta N; Unti E; Fornelli A; Giorgini S; Binda C; Macarri G; Larghi A; Fabbri C
Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stylet slow-pull versus standard suction for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
Saxena P; El Zein M; Stevens T; Abdelgelil A; Besharati S; Messallam A; Kumbhari V; Azola A; Brainard J; Shin EJ; Lennon AM; Canto MI; Singh VK; Khashab MA
Endoscopy; 2018 May; 50(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 29272906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between modified wet suction and dry suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions.
Tong T; Tian L; Deng M; Liu Y; Yang Y; Yin H; Long X; Pan S; Yang Z; Luo W; Nie K; Meng X; Xiao M; Wu X; Zhang C; Wang X
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Jun; 36(6):1663-1669. PubMed ID: 33295070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective comparison of slow-pull and standard suction techniques of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic cancer.
Bor R; Vasas B; Fábián A; Bálint A; Farkas K; Milassin Á; Czakó L; Rutka M; Molnár T; Szűcs M; Tiszlavicz L; Kaizer L; Hamar S; Szepes Z
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):6. PubMed ID: 30626331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Slow-Pull Using a Fanning Technique Is More Useful Than the Standard Suction Technique in EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Pancreatic Masses.
Lee JM; Lee HS; Hyun JJ; Lee JM; Yoo IK; Kim SH; Choi HS; Kim ES; Keum B; Seo YS; Jeen YT; Chun HJ; Um SH; Kim CD
Gut Liver; 2018 May; 12(3):360-366. PubMed ID: 29409303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA for pancreatic solid lesions with conventional 22-gauge needle using the slow pull technique: a prospective study.
Kin T; Katanuma A; Yane K; Takahashi K; Osanai M; Takaki R; Matsumoto K; Gon K; Matsumori T; Tomonari A; Maguchi H; Shinohara T; Nojima M
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 50(7):900-7. PubMed ID: 25732902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic efficacy of three suction techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions: protocol for a multicenter randomized cross-over clinical trial.
Li SY; Zhou W; Shi L; Ding Z; Yao J; Jiang YP; Gao L; Jiang H; Jin ZD; Wang KX
Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Jul; 52(7):734-739. PubMed ID: 32430272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial.
Crinò SF; Conti Bellocchi MC; Di Mitri R; Inzani F; Rimbaș M; Lisotti A; Manfredi G; Teoh AYB; Mangiavillano B; Sendino O; Bernardoni L; Manfrin E; Scimeca D; Unti E; Carlino A; Voiosu T; Mateescu RB; Fusaroli P; Lega S; Buscarini E; Pergola L; Chan SM; Lamonaca L; Ginès À; Fernández-Esparrach G; Facciorusso A; Larghi A
Endoscopy; 2023 Mar; 55(3):225-234. PubMed ID: 35915956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions.
Nayar MK; Paranandi B; Dawwas MF; Leeds JS; Darne A; Haugk B; Majumdar D; Ahmed MM; Oppong KW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 May; 85(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 27633157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fine Needle Biopsies of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Tissue Acquisition Technique and Needle Design Do Not Impact Specimen Adequacy.
Mendoza Ladd A; Casner N; Cherukuri SV; Garcia C; Padilla O; Dwivedi A; Hakim N
Dig Dis Sci; 2022 Sep; 67(9):4549-4556. PubMed ID: 34859313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histologic diagnosis of pancreatic masses using 25-gauge endoscopic ultrasound needles with and without a core trap: a multicenter randomized trial.
Kamata K; Kitano M; Yasukawa S; Kudo M; Chiba Y; Ogura T; Higuchi K; Fukutake N; Ashida R; Yamasaki T; Nebiki H; Hirose S; Hoki N; Asada M; Yazumi S; Takaoka M; Okazaki K; Matsuda F; Okabe Y; Yanagisawa A
Endoscopy; 2016 Jul; 48(7):632-8. PubMed ID: 27129137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective evaluation of new 22 gauge endoscopic ultrasound core needle using capillary sampling with stylet slow-pull technique for intra-abdominal solid masses.
Paik WH; Park Y; Park DH; Hong SM; Lee BU; Choi JH; Lee SS; Seo DW; Lee SK; Kim MH
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Mar; 49(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 24921417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy using a 22-gauge needle with side fenestration in pancreatic cystic lesions.
Barresi L; Tarantino I; Traina M; Granata A; Curcio G; Azzopardi N; Baccarini P; Liotta R; Fornelli A; Maimone A; Jovine E; Cennamo V; Fabbri C
Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Jan; 46(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 23916241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Core needle versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized crossover study.
Vanbiervliet G; Napoléon B; Saint Paul MC; Sakarovitch C; Wangermez M; Bichard P; Subtil C; Koch S; Grandval P; Gincul R; Karsenti D; Heyries L; Duchmann JC; Bourgaux JF; Levy M; Calament G; Fumex F; Pujol B; Lefort C; Poincloux L; Pagenault M; Bonin EA; Fabre M; Barthet M
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1063-70. PubMed ID: 25098612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
