These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27140749)

  • 1. Orthogonality-breaking sensing model based on the instantaneous Stokes vector and the Mueller calculus.
    Ortega-Quijano N; Fade J; Roche M; Parnet F; Alouini M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2016 Apr; 33(4):434-46. PubMed ID: 27140749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orthogonality breaking through few-mode optical fiber.
    Parnet F; Fade J; Alouini M
    Appl Opt; 2016 Apr; 55(10):2508-20. PubMed ID: 27139651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Full characterization of dichroic samples from a single measurement by circular polarization orthogonality breaking.
    Ortega-Quijano N; Fade J; Schaub E; Parnet F; Alouini M
    Opt Lett; 2015 Apr; 40(7):1270-3. PubMed ID: 25831310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orthogonality-breaking polarimetric sensing modalities for selective polarization imaging.
    Parnet F; Staes J; Fade J; Ortega-Quijano N; Alouini M
    Opt Lett; 2020 Mar; 45(6):1423-1426. PubMed ID: 32163982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Free-space active polarimetric imager operating at 1.55  μm by orthogonality breaking sensing.
    Parnet F; Fade J; Ortega-Quijano N; Loas G; Frein L; Alouini M
    Opt Lett; 2017 Feb; 42(4):723-726. PubMed ID: 28198849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthogonality-breaking sensing model based on the instantaneous Stokes vector and the Mueller calculus: erratum.
    Ortega-Quijano N; Fade J; Roche M; Parnet F; Alouini M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2017 Aug; 34(8):1383. PubMed ID: 29036104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization on five effective parameters of anisotropic optical material using Stokes parameters-Demonstration by a fiber-type polarimeter.
    Lo YL; Pham TT; Chen PC
    Opt Express; 2010 Apr; 18(9):9133-50. PubMed ID: 20588761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Depolarization remote sensing by orthogonality breaking.
    Fade J; Alouini M
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Jul; 109(4):043901. PubMed ID: 23006088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of linear birefringence and diattenuation properties of optical samples using polarimeter and Stokes parameters.
    Chen PC; Lo YL; Yu TC; Lin JF; Yang TT
    Opt Express; 2009 Aug; 17(18):15860-84. PubMed ID: 19724586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of optically anisotropic properties of biological tissues under stretching based on differential Mueller matrix formalism.
    Chen HW; Huang CL; Lo YL; Chang YR
    J Biomed Opt; 2017 Mar; 22(3):35006. PubMed ID: 28289750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extraction of effective parameters of turbid media utilizing the Mueller matrix approach: study of glucose sensing.
    Pham TT; Lo YL
    J Biomed Opt; 2012 Sep; 17(9):97002-1. PubMed ID: 23085921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fast and optimal broad-band Stokes/Mueller polarimeter design by the use of a genetic algorithm.
    Letnes PA; Nerbø IS; Aas LM; Ellingsen PG; Kildemo M
    Opt Express; 2010 Oct; 18(22):23095-103. PubMed ID: 21164651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polarized representation for depolarization-dominant materials.
    Jarecki Q; Kupinski M
    Opt Express; 2024 Feb; 32(5):8262-8283. PubMed ID: 38439487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography system tolerant to fiber disturbances using a line camera.
    Marques MJ; Rivet S; Bradu A; Podoleanu A
    Opt Lett; 2015 Aug; 40(16):3858-61. PubMed ID: 26274678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of the Mueller matrix of UV-inscribed long-period fiber grating.
    Salas-Alcántara KM; Espinosa-Luna R; Torres-Gómez I; Barmenkov YO
    Appl Opt; 2014 Jan; 53(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 24514060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimum selection of input polarization states in determining the sample Mueller matrix: a dual photoelastic polarimeter approach.
    Layden D; Wood MF; Vitkin IA
    Opt Express; 2012 Aug; 20(18):20466-81. PubMed ID: 23037095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optical characterization of porcine articular cartilage using a polarimetry technique with differential Mueller matrix formulism.
    Chang CM; Lo YL; Tran NK; Chang YJ
    Appl Opt; 2018 Mar; 57(9):2121-2127. PubMed ID: 29604002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mueller matrix differential decomposition.
    Ortega-Quijano N; Arce-Diego JL
    Opt Lett; 2011 May; 36(10):1942-4. PubMed ID: 21593943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quaternion algebra for Stokes-Mueller formalism.
    Kuntman E; Kuntman MA; Canillas A; Arteaga O
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2019 Apr; 36(4):492-497. PubMed ID: 31044962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fiber polarimetric stress sensors.
    Chua TH; Chen CL
    Appl Opt; 1989 Aug; 28(15):3158-65. PubMed ID: 20555665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.