These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27141162)

  • 1. Assessment and comparison of retention of zirconia copings luted with different cements onto zirconia and titanium abutments: An in vitro study.
    Menon NS; Kumar GP; Jnanadev KR; Satish Babu CL; Shetty S
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 27141162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dislodgement Resistance of Zirconia Copings Cemented onto Zirconia and Titanium Abutments.
    Güler U; Budak Y; Queiroz JRC; Özcan M
    Implant Dent; 2017 Aug; 26(4):510-515. PubMed ID: 28383306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention of zirconia on titanium in two-piece abutments with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Mehl C; Zhang Q; Lehmann F; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):214-219. PubMed ID: 29627210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resistance to dislodgement of zirconia copings cemented onto titanium abutments of different heights.
    Abbo B; Razzoog ME; Vivas J; Sierraalta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 18182182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Retention Forces of Implant-Supported Zirconia Copings on Titanium Abutments Coated with Metal Opaquers Using Different Cements.
    Lei W; Guo J; Du R; Shi B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(2):339-345. PubMed ID: 35476863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of reduced airborne-particle abrasion pressure on the retention of zirconia copings resin bonded to titanium abutments.
    Hansen NA; Wille S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):60-67. PubMed ID: 31703916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Debonding Forces for Two-Piece Zirconia Abutments with Implant Platforms of Different Diameter and Use of Different Luting Strategies.
    Zenthöfer A; Rues S; Krisam J; Rustemeyer R; Rammelsberg P; Schmitter M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1041-1046. PubMed ID: 30231090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors determining the retentiveness of luting agents used with metal- and ceramic-based implant components.
    Schiessl C; Schaefer L; Winter C; Fuerst J; Rosentritt M; Zeman F; Behr M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 May; 17(4):1179-90. PubMed ID: 22847855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retention of cemented zirconia copings on TiBase abutments.
    Santos-Neto OS; Gonçalves LM; Maia-Filho EM; Malheiros AS; Firoozmand LM; Villis PC; Cardenas AF; Tavarez RR
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2021 Dec; 34(3):214-220. PubMed ID: 35088807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cement thickness at implant-supported single-tooth Lava assemblies: a scanning electron microscopic investigation.
    Apicella D; Veltri M; Chieffi N; Balleri P; Ferrari M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):747-50. PubMed ID: 20636729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retentive strength of two-piece CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutments.
    Gehrke P; Alius J; Fischer C; Erdelt KJ; Beuer F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):920-5. PubMed ID: 23527950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
    Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retention of different temporary cements tested on zirconia crowns and titanium abutments in vitro.
    Dähne F; Meißner H; Böning K; Arnold C; Gutwald R; Prause E
    Int J Implant Dent; 2021 Jul; 7(1):62. PubMed ID: 34282495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Undetected Excess Cement at Marginal Areas of Zirconia Crown Copings: In Vitro Analysis of Two Luting Agents and Their Influence on Retention.
    Augusti D; Augusti G; Re D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(2):202-211. PubMed ID: 32069345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
    Mansour A; Ercoli C; Graser G; Tallents R; Moss M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
    Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retention of zirconia copings over smooth and airborne-particle-abraded titanium bases with different resin cements.
    Linkevicius T; Caplikas A; Dumbryte I; Linkeviciene L; Svediene O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jun; 121(6):949-954. PubMed ID: 30711294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention Forces between Titanium and Zirconia Components of Two-Part Implant Abutments with Different Techniques of Surface Modification.
    von Maltzahn NF; Holstermann J; Kohorst P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 18(4):735-44. PubMed ID: 25916969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.